Noncompliant Materials; Obligation to Cure Sample Clauses

Noncompliant Materials; Obligation to Cure. Remediation of any materials that do not comply with County’s Web Site Accessibility Policy shall be the responsibility of Consultant. If County, in its sole and absolute discretion, determines that any deliverable intended for use or publication on any County-managed or County-funded Web site does not comply with County Accessibility Standards, County will promptly inform Consultant in writing. Upon such notice, Consultant shall, without charge to County, repair or replace the non-compliant materials within such period of time as specified by County in writing. If the required repair or replacement is not completed within the time specified, County shall have the right to do any or all of the following, without prejudice to County’s right to pursue any and all other remedies at law or in equity:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Noncompliant Materials; Obligation to Cure. Remediation of any materials that do not comply with County of Sonoma’s Web Site Accessibility Policy shall be the responsibility of Consultant. If RCPA, in its sole and absolute discretion, determines that any deliverable intended for use or publication on any RCPA-managed or RCPA-funded Web site does not comply with County Accessibility Standards, RCPA will promptly inform Consultant in writing. Upon such notice, Consultant shall, without charge to RCPA, repair or replace the non-compliant materials within such period of time as specified by RCPA in writing. If the required repair or replacement is not completed within the time specified, RCPA shall have the right to do any or all of the following, without prejudice to RCPA right to pursue any and all other remedies at law or in equity:
Sample 1
Noncompliant Materials; Obligation to Cure. Remediation of any materials that do not comply with Sonoma Water’s Web Site Accessibility Policy shall be the responsibility of Consultant. If Sonoma Water, in its sole and absolute discretion, determines that any deliverable intended for use or publication on any Sonoma Water managed or Sonoma Water funded Web site does not comply with Sonoma Water Accessibility Standards, Sonoma Water will promptly inform Consultant in writing. Upon such notice, Consultant shall, without charge to Sonoma Water, repair or replace the non-compliant materials within such period of time as specified by Sonoma Water in writing. If the required repair or replacement is not completed within the time specified, Sonoma Water shall have the right to do any or all of the following, without prejudice to Sonoma Water’s right to pursue any and all other remedies at law or in equity:
Sample 1
Noncompliant Materials; Obligation to Cure. Remediation of any materials that do not comply with County’s Web Site Accessibility Policy shall be the responsibility of Contractor. If SCTA, in its sole and absolute discretion, determines that any deliverable intended for use or publication on any SCTA-managed or SCTA-funded web site does not comply with County Accessibility Standards, SCTA will promptly inform Contractor in writing. Upon such notice, Contractor shall, without charge to SCTA, repair or replace the non-compliant materials within such period of time as specified by SCTA in writing. If the required repair or replacement is not completed within the time specified, SCTA shall have the right to do any or all of the following, without prejudice to SCTA’s right to pursue any and all other remedies at law or in equity:
Sample 1

Related to Noncompliant Materials; Obligation to Cure

  • HIPAA Compliance If this Contract involves services, activities or products subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), the Contractor covenants that it will appropriately safeguard Protected Health Information (defined in 45 CFR 160.103), and agrees that it is subject to, and shall comply with, the provisions of 45 CFR 164 Subpart E regarding use and disclosure of Protected Health Information.

  • Non-Compliant Work Should the A/E and/or the ODR identify Work as non-compliant with the Contract Documents, the ODR will communicate the finding to the Contractor and the Contractor will correct such Work at its expense. The approval of Work by either the A/E or ODR does not relieve the Contractor from the obligation to comply with all requirements of the Contract Documents.

  • FERPA Compliance In connection with all FERPA Records that Contractor may create, receive or maintain on behalf of University pursuant to the Underlying Agreement, Contractor is designated as a University Official with a legitimate educational interest in and with respect to such FERPA Records, only to the extent to which Contractor (a) is required to create, receive or maintain FERPA Records to carry out the Underlying Agreement, and (b) understands and agrees to all of the following terms and conditions without reservation:

  • CEQA Compliance The District has complied with all assessment requirements imposed upon it by the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resource Code Section 21000 et seq. (“CEQA”) in connection with the Project, and no further environmental review of the Project is necessary pursuant to CEQA before the construction of the Project may commence.

  • Notice of Non-Compliant Work A Notice of Non-Compliant Work shall be in writing, shall be dated, shall be signed by the Design Professional, and shall be addressed to the Contractor with a copy to the Owner, as set forth in Section 3, Part 4 (Correcting the Work) and Section 6, Part 6 (Correcting the Work after Final Payment).

  • Status Substantial Compliance Analysis The Compliance Officer found that PPB is in substantial compliance with Paragraph 80. See Sections IV and VII Report, p. 17. COCL carefully outlines the steps PPB has taken—and we, too, have observed—to do so. Id. We agree with the Compliance Officer’s assessment. In 2018, the Training Division provided an extensive, separate analysis of data concerning ECIT training. See Evaluation Report: 2018 Enhanced Crisis Intervention Training, Training usefulness, on-the-job applications, and reinforcing training objectives, February 2019. The Training Division assessed survey data showing broad officer support for the 2018 ECIT training. The survey data also showed a dramatic increase in the proportion of officers who strongly agree that their supervisors are very supportive of the ECIT program, reaching 64.3% in 2018, compared to only 14.3% in 2015: The Training Division analyzed the survey results of the police vehicle operator training and supervisory in-service training, as well. These analyses were helpful in understanding attendees’ impressions of training and its application to their jobs, though the analyses did not reach as far as the ECIT’s analysis of post-training on- the-job assessment. In all three training analyses, Training Division applied a feedback model to shape future training. This feedback loop was the intended purpose of Paragraph 80. PPB’s utilization of feedback shows PPB’s internalization of the remedy. We reviewed surveys of Advanced Academy attendees, as well. Attendees were overwhelmingly positive in response to the content of most classes. Though most respondents agreed on the positive aspects of keeping the selected course in the curriculum, a handful of attendees chose options like “redundant” and “slightly disagree,” indicating that the survey tools could be used for critical assessment and not merely PPB self-validation. We directly observed PPB training and evaluations since our last report. PPB provided training materials to the Compliance Officer and DOJ in advance of training. Where either identified issues, PPB worked through those issues and honed its materials. As Paragraph 80 requires, PPB’s training included competency-based evaluations, namely: knowledge checks (i.e., quizzes on directives), in-class responsive quizzes (using clickers to respond to questions presented to the group); knowledge tests (examinations via links PPB sent to each student’s Bureau-issued iPhone); demonstrated skills and oral examination (officers had to show proficiency in first aid skills, weapons use, and defensive tactics); and scenario evaluations (officers had to explain their reasoning for choices after acting through scenarios). These were the same sort of competency-based evaluations we commended in our last report. In this monitoring period, PPB applied the same type of evaluations to supervisory-level training as well as in-service training for all sworn members. PPB successfully has used the surveys, testing, and the training audit.

  • PCI Compliance A. The Acquiring Bank will provide The Merchant with appropriate training on PCI PED and/or DSS rules and regulations in respect of The Merchants obligations. Initial training will be provided and at appropriate intervals as and when relevant changes are made to such rules and regulations.

  • OSHA Compliance To the extent applicable to the services to be performed under this Agreement, Contractor represents and warrants, that all articles and services furnished under this Agreement meet or exceed the safety standards established and promulgated under the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Law (Public Law 91-596) and its regulations in effect or proposed as of the date of this Agreement.

  • ADA Compliance A. The Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.) and the regulations thereunder (28 C.F.R. § 35.130) (“ADA”) prohibit discrimination against persons with disabilities by the State, whether directly or through contractual arrangements, in the provision of any aid, benefit, or service. As a condition of receiving this Agreement, the Company certifies that services, programs, and activities provided under this Agreement are and will continue to be in compliance with the ADA.

  • Non-Compliance Any Products or Services that are not in conformity with the requirements of an Order (“Non-Complying Products” and “Non-Complying Services”, respectively), may be returned at DXC’s option at Supplier’s risk and expense. DXC may procure similar Products or Services in substitution for the Non-Complying Products or Services, and Supplier shall refund the cost of the Non-Complying Products and Service and reimburse DXC upon demand for all additional costs incurred by DXC.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.