Number and Significance of Incidents Sample Clauses

Number and Significance of Incidents. 2.1.1 A total of 10 incidents were reported between December 2007 and January 2008. Of these, nine were actual incidents and one was an attempted incident. The details of the incidents are provided in the Annex. Between December 2006 and January 2007, a total of 15 incidents were reported, of which ten were actual incidents and five were attempted incidents. Overall, the number of actual incidents has remained fairly consistent during the period December 2007 – January 2008, and December 2006 – January 2007. However, the number of attempted incidents has declined from five incidents during the period December 2006 – January 2007 to one incident during the period December 2007 – January 2008. Please see Table 1 below. December December December January 2007- December January 2006- 2007 2008 January 2006 2007 January 2008 2007 Actual 4 5 9 5 5 10
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Number and Significance of Incidents. 2.1.1 A total of seven incidents were reported in November 2007. Of these, three were actual incidents and four were attempted incidents. Of the four attempted incidents reported, three took place on the high seas. The ISC has classified these incidents as cases of attempted piracy. Overall, the total number of incidents reported in November 2007 has declined compared to November 2006. A total of nine incidents were reported in November 2006, of which seven were actual incidents and two were attempted incidents. The decline can be attributed to the decrease in the number of actual incidents reported in November 2007 compared to November 2006. However, there was an increase in the number of attempted incidents reported from two in November 2006 to four in November 2007. Please see Table 1 below. November 2007 November 2006 Total 7 9
Sample 1
Number and Significance of Incidents. 2.1.1 A total of six incidents were reported in February 2008. Of these, four were actual incidents and two were attempted incidents. The details of the incidents are provided in the Annex. Overall, the total number of incidents in February 2008 has increased slightly compared to February 2007. A total of four incidents were reported in February 2007, of which three were actual incidents and one was an attempted incident. Please see Table 1 below. February 2008 February 2007 Total 6 4 Table 1 – Number of actual and attempted incidents (February 2008 and February 2007)
Sample 1
Number and Significance of Incidents. 2.1.1 A total of 14 incidents of armed robbery against ships were reported in April 2008. Of these, 12 were actual incidents and two were attempted incidents. This is the highest total number of incidents reported in 2008 compared to the first three months of 2008. There was an increase in the number of actual incidents reported in April 2008 compared to April 2007. However, the number of attempted incidents in April 2008 has decreased by half compared to April 2007. Please see Table 1 below. April 2008 April 2007 Total 14 11 Table 1 – Actual and attempted incidents during April 2008 and April 2007
Sample 1

Related to Number and Significance of Incidents

  • EXCLUSION OF INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE BNPP ENTITIES OR THEIR SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS OR CONFIDENTIAL OR OTHER INFORMATION, FOR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, FOR PERSONAL INJURY, FOR LOSS OF PRIVACY, FOR FAILURE TO MEET ANY DUTY INCLUDING OF GOOD FAITH OR OF REASONABLE CARE, FOR NEGLIGENCE, AND FOR ANY OTHER PECUNIARY OR OTHER LOSS WHATSOEVER) ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE SOFTWARE, THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES, OR OTHERWISE UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PROVISION OF THIS SECTION 19, EVEN IN THE EVENT OF THE FAULT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT OR BREACH OF WARRANTY OF THE BNPP ENTITIES OR ANY SUPPLIER, AND EVEN IF THE BNPP ENTITIES OR ANY SUPPLIER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY BNPP ENTITY OR ANY SUPPLIER BE LIABLE FOR ACTS OF GOD, ACTS OF WAR OR TERRORISM, MACHINE OR COMPUTER BREAKDOWN OR MALFUNCTION, INTERRUPTION OR MALFUNCTION OF COMMUNICATION FACILITIES, LABOR DIFFICULTIES OR ANY OTHER SIMILAR OR DISSIMILAR CAUSE BEYOND THEIR REASONABLE CONTROL.

  • Notification of Incidents If Contractor becomes aware of or has reasonable suspicion of a privacy incident or security incident regarding any State data, Contractor must report such incident to the State and the State Chief Information Security Officer as soon as possible, but no later than twenty-four (24) hours after such incident. The decision to notify the affected data subjects and the form of such notice following report of a privacy incident or security incident are the responsibility of the State. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Contract, Contractor will indemnify, hold harmless and defend the State and its officers, and employees for and against any claims, damages, costs and expenses related to any privacy incident or security incident involving any State data. For purposes of clarification, the foregoing sentence shall in no way limit or diminish Contractor’s obligation(s) to indemnify, save, hold harmless, or defend the State under any other term of this Contract. Contractor will reasonably mitigate any harmful effects resulting from any privacy incident or security incident involving any State data.

  • SEVERABILITY IN EVENT OF PARTIAL INVALIDITY If any provision of this Agreement is held in whole or in part to be unenforceable for any reason, the remainder of that provision and of the entire Agreement will be severable and remain in effect.

  • Claims for Concealed or Unknown Conditions If conditions are encountered at the site which are (1) subsurface or otherwise concealed physical conditions which differ materially from those indicated in the Contract Documents or (2) unknown physical conditions of an unusual nature, which differ materially from those ordinarily found to exist and generally recognized as inherent in construction activities of the character provided for in the Contract Documents, then notice by the observing party shall be given to the other party promptly before conditions are disturbed and in no event later than twenty-one (21) days after first observance of the conditions. The Architect will promptly investigate such conditions and, if they differ materially and cause an increase or decrease in the Contractor's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the Work, will recommend an equitable adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time, or both. If the Architect determines that the conditions at the site are not materially different from those indicated in the Contract Documents and that no change in the terms of the Contract is justified, the Architect shall so notify the Owner and Contractor in writing, stating the reasons. Claims by either party in opposition to such determination must be made within twenty-one (21) days after the Architect has given notice of the decision. If the Owner and Contractor cannot agree on an adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time, the adjustment shall be referred to the Architect for initial determination, subject to further proceedings pursuant to Paragraph 4.4.

  • Cooperation of Parties The Parties to this Agreement agree to cooperate in good faith to prepare and execute all documents, to seek Court approval, defend Court approval, and to do all things reasonably necessary to complete and effectuate the Settlement described in this Agreement.

  • Relation of Parties It is the intention of Landlord and Tenant to hereby create the relationship of landlord and tenant, and no other relationship whatsoever is hereby created. Nothing in this Lease shall be construed to make Landlord and Tenant partners or joint venturers or to render either party hereto liable for any obligation of the other.

  • Independence of the Parties This Agreement shall not constitute the designation of any Party as the representative or agent of the other, nor shall any Party by this Agreement have the right or authority to make any promise, guarantee, warranty, or representation, or to assume, create, or incur any liability or other obligation of any kind, express or implied, against or in the name of, or on behalf of, the other, except as expressly provided herein.

  • Application of General Conditions These General Conditions set forth the terms and conditions generally applicable to the Development Grant Agreement to the extent and subject to any modifications set forth in such agreement.”

  • Severability and Termination 1. In the event any provision of this Agreement is deemed by a Federal court to be contrary to, or in violation of, any applicable existing law or regulation of the United States of America, only the conflicting provision(s) shall be deemed null and void, and the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain in effect.

  • Limitation of Liability in Event of Breach An Interconnection Party (“Breaching Party”) shall have no liability hereunder to the other Interconnection Parties, and the other Interconnection Parties hereby release the Breaching Party, for all claims or damages that either of them incurs that are associated with any interruption in the availability of the Customer Facility, Interconnection Facilities, Transmission System or Interconnection Service or damages to an Interconnection Party’s facilities, except to the extent such interruption or damage is caused by the Breaching Party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of its obligations under this Interconnection Service Agreement (including Appendix 2).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.