Number of functional reviews Sample Clauses

Number of functional reviews conducted 1.3.1 The status of the reporting system and of indicators to monitor PFRS implementation 1.4.1 Number of policy contributions drafted and made available to other AU services 1.5.1 Number of communication products published (by type) 1.5.2 Number of policy makers reached with com- munication products (by country) 1.1.1 Annual report 1.2.1 Final functional reviews publicly available 1.3.1 Annual report 1.4.1 Annual report 1.5.1 Annual report (based on social medias and websites statistics) Momentum on CAADP is maintained Collaboration between AU services is not impeded by reorganisation Outcome 2 (Specific Objective) 2. Fisheries and aquaculture policies in Africa are coherent with the PFRS and coordinated at continental, regional and national levels in order to maintain healthy and resilient marine, coastal and freshwater ecosystems in the context of climate change 2.1 Number of RECs that adopted PFRS-aligned regional fisheries and aquaculture policies 2.2 2 Number of countries that adopted PFRS- aligned fisheries and aquaculture policies 2.3 Number of institutionalised cooperation agree- ments signed between RECs, RFBs and/or RSC. 1.3 Draft policy documents 1.4 Draft policy documents 1.5 Cooperation agreements The AU institutional reform, including a better coordination between national, regional and continental African institutions and clear division of labour based on subsidiarity complementar- ity, comparative advantage and burden sharing, is implemented in accordance with the planned timeframe. Outputs SO2 2.1 Capacities and systems for regional collaboration and integration regard- ing shared fisheries and aquaculture resources management are improved and linkages with environmental governance frameworks are enhanced 2.2 Capacities of Member states, RECs and RFBs to develop realistic sustainable fisheries and aquaculture policies in coherence with PFRS are strengthened 2.3 Capacities are strengthened to facilitate intra and inter regional fish trade in line with the regional integration trade agenda and the Protocol on Trade in Goods of the ACFTA 2.1.1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Number of functional reviews

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Initial Review The Union may present a written grievance to the DOC Headquarters Labor Relations Office via electronic mail within the twenty-one (21) day period described above. The Agency Head or designee will meet or confer by telephone or electronic conferencing with a Business Representative and/or Shop Xxxxxxx and the grievant within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the grievance, and will respond in writing to the Union within twenty-one (21) days after the meeting.

  • Annual Reviews The Recipient shall:

  • Quote Review Each Quote received from the Contractor will be reviewed in detail for appropriateness of quantities and tasks selected. Submittals will be reviewed, as well as the Work duration schedule and list of Subcontractor. The County will evaluate the proposed Work units and may compare them with the independent County estimate of the same tasks to determine the reasonableness of approach, including the nature and number of Work units proposed. The County will determine whether the Contractor’s Quote is acceptable.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • Departmental Review If informal resolution of the problem through conciliation and negotiation cannot be effected, an aggrieved person may file a formal complaint with the departmental affirmative action coordinator or other designated official. Such a complaint must be filed on a form provided for this purpose and within five working days after the attempted resolution of the problem by the equal employment opportunity counselor or within twenty-five (25) working days after the date of the alleged discriminatory action, whichever shall first occur. The affirmative action coordinator will decide whether the complaint falls within the jurisdiction of the procedure and accept or reject it. Upon acceptance of the complaint, the affirmative action coordinator shall obtain the notes on the case from the equal employment opportunity counselor; may conduct a prompt, impartial investigation if he deems it necessary; shall explore the possibility of resolving the problem through negotiation or conciliation; shall present findings and recommendations on resolving the complaint to the agency/department head; and within forty-five (45) working days from the date the formal complaint was filed, shall present his written decision, as approved by the agency/department head, to the complainant, with a copy of the complaint and decision to be forwarded to the director of personnel.

  • Annual Review The Board of Directors during the Contract Period shall review annually, or at more frequent intervals which the Board of Directors determines is appropriate, the Executive’s compensation and shall award the Executive additional compensation to reflect the Executive’s performance, the performance of the Company and competitive compensation levels, all as determined in the discretion of the Board of Directors.

  • HUB Subcontracting Plan The Owner has adopted Exhibit H, Policy on Utilization of Historically Underutilized Business ("Policy"), which is incorporated herein by reference. Contractor, as a provision of the Agreement must comply with the requirements of the Policy and adhere to the HUB Subcontracting Plan submitted with Contractor's Proposal and attached as Exhibit I. No changes to the HUB Subcontracting Plan can be made by the Contractor without the prior written approval of the Owner in accordance with the Policy.

  • External Review In the event of a final internal Adverse Benefit Determination, a Claimant may be entitled to an external review of the Claim. This request must be submitted in writing on an External Review Request form within 120 days of receipt of the Adverse Benefit Determination. The external reviewer will render a recommendation within 45 calendar days unless the request meets expedited criteria, in which case it will be resolved in no later than 72 hours. The external reviewer’s recommendation will be binding. The external reviewer will notify the Claimant of its decision in writing, and the Plan will take action as appropriate to comply with such recommendation. For detailed information about the external review process, please contact XxXxx’s Member Engagement Center.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.