O R D E R. Based on the foregoing, and the parties having agreed that the above-named child shall be informally adjusted in this matter, without formal adjudication and disposition, the Court hereby ORDERS:
O R D E R. Leave granted.
O R D E R. 1. A Settlement Agreement dated 29th February, 2024 is placed on record. The learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the Settlement Agreement has been digitally signed by both the petitioner and the respondent. They state that it is physically signed by their learned counsel in the presence of the learned Mediator who has also signed the same.
O R D E R. AND NOW this day of 20 , the attached agreement entered into by the parties is entered as an ORDER of this court.
O R D E R. AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2005, having considered appellants’ application for reargument, the application is denied.
O R D E R. Before the Commission is a special contract between Xxxxx County Water District No. 2 ( Xxxxx District ) and Xxxxxx Brothers Ready Mix Concrete Supply Company, Inc. ( Xxxxxx Brothers ). This agreement required, inter alia, that Xxxxxx Brothers construct approximately $30,000 of system improvements as a condition for receiving water service to a proposed concrete plant in Xxxxx County, Kentucky. Xxxxx District acknowledges that the system improvements were not needed to provide water service to the proposed concrete plant and were not the product of voluntary negotiations. Kentucky law clearly prohibits a utility from imposing conditions for utility service that are not set forth in its filed rate schedules. See KRS 278.160. Our regulations, moreover, prohibit such conduct. Administrative Regulation 807 KAR 5:006, Section 5, provides:
O R D E R. Liquor License No. LC0038537 )
O R D E R. On April 14, 2004, ProNet Communications, Inc. (“ProNet”) and Kentucky ALLTEL, Inc. submitted to the Commission a resale agreement. The agreement was negotiated pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“1996 Act”), 47 U.S.C. Sections 251 and 252. Section 252(e) of the 1996 Act requires the parties to an agreement adopted by negotiation to submit the agreement for approval to the Commission. ProNet asked that the agreement be approved by Order rather than by operation of law.
O R D E R. On May 5, 2003, Jessamine-South Elkhorn Water District (“District”) filed for Commission approval a new or amended WATER USER AGREEMENT (“Agreement”). The Agreement was between the District and the customer and its execution by the landlord/owner and tenant/lessee was necessary as a condition of service. The Agreement stated, “if the CUSTOMER is a Renter, then the Owner of the leased property shall be required to sign this contract before water service is begun and the OWNER shall be bound by all the provisions of the agreement including all charges for service.” The Agreement provides for the signature of the owner, including address and telephone number. The District is unilaterally imposing as a condition for service that the landlord/owner is jointly and severally responsible with tenant/lessee for payment of all charges. This issue is referred to herein as “landlord/tenant liability.” The landlord/tenant liability issue was addressed by the Commission in its decision and Order in Xxxxxx County Water District No. 1, Case No. 9383 (Ky. PSC,
O R D E R. The Government of India hereby decides that the following shall be added as Clauses 1.7, 5.2, 6.5 and 6.6 to the “ Schedule to the License Agreement” for DTH Services
