DECISION AND ORDER. Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code§ 11-SA and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that:
1. The applicant's request for annexation & zoning and a vacation is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2023, attached as Exhibit A.
DECISION AND ORDER. The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”), having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of Google Inc. and/or Motorola Mobility, Inc. (now Motorola Mobility LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Respondent Google Inc.) (hereinafter referred to as “Respondents”), and Respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft Complaint that the Bureau of Competition proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge Respondents with violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45; and Respondents, their attorneys, and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an Agreement Containing Consent Order (“Consent Agreement”), containing admissions by Respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft Complaint, a statement that the signing of said Consent Agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by Respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such Complaint, or that the facts as alleged in such Complaint, other than jurisdictional facts, are true, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission’s Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that Respondents have violated the said Act, and that a Complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having accepted the executed Consent Agreement and placed such Consent Agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days for the receipt and consideration of public comments, now in further conformity with the procedure described in Commission Rule 2.34, 16 C.F.R. § 2.34, the Commission hereby makes the following jurisdictional findings and issues the following Decision and Order (“Order”).
DECISION AND ORDER. Sellers hereby grant to Buyers all of the rights that they is required to grant to Buyers pursuant to the Decision and Order.
DECISION AND ORDER. XXXXX, United States District Judge.
DECISION AND ORDER. 196. In accordance with RAA Section 63(1)(d) and Section 5.1.1 of the Remedies GD, BCV shall revise the Draft MAIA to conform to the requirements set out in this Interim Decision and Order and deliver a copy of the Compliance MAIA to the Authority (a clean version along with a comparison against the Draft MAIA) no later than 5:00 p.m. on 8 November 2013. 197. Interested parties will have until 5:00 p.m. on 15 November 2013 to file any remaining “fatal flaw” objections concerning the Compliance MAIA. Parties shall confine their Compliance Comments to the Compliance XXXX's conformity with this Interim Decision and Order and should address those aspects of the Compliance MAIA that, in their view, would seriously hamper competitive entry by a wholesale access provider, would be detrimental to the public interest, or are in contravention of the RAA, ECA, or the Remedies GD.
DECISION AND ORDER. 16 I. As to XXXXXXXX
17 1. All licenses and licensing rights of XXXXXXXX under the Real Estate Law 18 are revoked; provided, however, a restricted real estate salesperson license shall be issued to 19 XXXXXXXX pursuant to Section 10156.5 of the Code if XXXXXXXX makes application therefore 20 and pays to the Department the appropriate fee for the restricted license within 90 days from the 21 effective date of this Decision and Order. The restricted license issued to XXXXXXXX shall be 22 subject to all of the provisions of Section 10156.7 of the Code and to the following limitations, 23 conditions and restrictions imposed under authority of Section 10156.5 of that Code:
(a) The restricted license issued to XXXXXXXX shall be suspended prior to 25 hearing by Order of the Commissioner in the event of XXXXXXXX'x 26 conviction (including by plea of guilty or nolo contendere) to a crime which is substantially related to XXXXXXXX'x fitness or capacity as a real N estate licensee; and,
(b) The restricted license issued to XXXXXXXX shall be suspended prior to hearing by Order of the Commissioner on evidence satisfactory to the Commissioner that Respondent has violated provisions of the California Real Estate Law, the Subdivided Lands Law, Regulations of the Real Estate Commissioner, or conditions attaching to the restricted license.
DECISION AND ORDER. In The Matter of: Consolidated Industries. (Case No. F–082) The Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products (other than automobiles) was established pursuant to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Public Law 94–163, 89 Stat. 917, as wide by 79 feet tall. Finally, the licensee amended (EPCA), which requires DOE wishes to construct a deflector at spillway 2 for the development of such a device to reduce the level of dissolved gasses in the spilled water. The deflector would consist of a triangular structural steel section with concrete ballast, 32 feet below the spillway crest. The deflector’s horizontal surface would be approximately 12 feet and would run the full width of the spillway slot, approximately 50 feet.
DECISION AND ORDER. In pertinent part, basic permits issued pursuant to the Federal Alcohol Administration Act are conditioned upon compliance with the requirements of 27 U.S.C. §§ 205 and 206 “and with all other Federal laws relating to distilled spirits, wine, and malt beverages, including taxes with respect thereto.” 27 U.S.C. § 204(d).
DECISION AND ORDER. On July 5, 2011, this Court denied the government’s motion for a preliminary injunction against Defendants NCR and Appleton Papers Inc. In doing so, I found that although the government had set forth grounds for relief against NCR, it had not done so against Appleton Papers because it was unlikely that Appleton Papers had successor liability under CERCLA. Appleton Papers (“API”) has now moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. For the reasons given below, I will deny the motion.
DECISION AND ORDER. On March 6, 1992, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Xxxxx Xxxxxxx issued the attached decision and recommended order in this matter. Thereafter, Gerawan Ranches, Gerawan C o., Inc., Gerawan Enterprises, Xxx X. Xxxxxxx and Star X. Xxxxxxx, (Respondent) filed exceptions to the ALJ's decision with a brief in support of exceptions and General Counsel filed a response brief. The Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) has considered the ALJ 's decision in light of the record and the briefs of the parties and has decided to affirm the ALJ's findings of fact and conclusions of law and to adopt his recommended remedial provisions.
