Opinion No. 2: Costs incurred by Operatory in procuring abstracts and fee paid outside attorneys for the title examination (including preliminary, supplemental, shut-in gas royalty opinions and division order title opinions) shall be borne by the Drilling Parties in the proportion that the Interest of each Drilling Party bears to the total interest of all Drilling Parties as such interests appear in Exhibit “A”. Operator shall make no charge for services rendered by its staff attorneys or other personnel in the performance of the above functions. Each party shall be responsible for securing curative matter and pooling amendments required in connection with leases for oil and gas interests contributed by such party. Operator shall be responsible for the preparation and recording of pooling designations or declarations as well as the conduct of hearings before governmental agencies for the securing of spacing or pooling orders. This shall not prevent any party from appearing on its own behalf at any such hearing. No well shall be drilled on the Counsel Area until after (I) the title to the drilling or drilling unit has been examined as above provided, and (2) the title has been approved by the examining attorney or tide has bean accepted by all of the parties who are to participate in the drilling of the well.
Opinion No. GA-0260 provided to the Honorable Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Chair of the Senate Jurisprudence Committee, Texas State Senate, Constitutionality of the Texas grandparent access statute, section 153.433, Family Code, in light of the Untied States Supreme Court’s decision in Xxxxxx v Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000)”, October, 2004.
Opinion No. 94-1109. State attorney general defines normal maintenance, re-roofing, painting or wallpapering, asbestos removal, or changes to mechanical and electrical systems not to be alterations (i.e. construction). Per GC 4450 such work thus is not subject to DSA review. Projects not intended for use by the public: This may include: Some faculty/staff housing projects The determination of CBC Chapter 11B accessibility applicability is complex and project specific. Faculty/staff projects will likely have elements that trigger the requirement for DSA review and approval. Contact CPDC to discuss. Any reasonable availability to or usage by, persons with disabilities: Projects that have no reasonable availability to persons with disabilities are limited, but might include mechanical system installations/upgrades, roof-top solar arrays in non- public areas, utility tunnel changes, etc. Most infrastructure projects however will likely have elements that trigger a requirement for DSA review and approval. For example below-grade utility line or street improvement work that removes/replaces curbs or walks affect paths of travel and will require access compliance review. Contact CPDC to discuss. Access Compliance submittals to DSA Submittals to DSA shall be made by the architect-of-record for the project directly to DSA. The campus shall coordinate payment by check for DSA access review fees to DSA. Initial DSA reviews may take 4 to 6 weeks. Plan accordingly. For small projects DSA currently accepts appointments for over-the-counter reviews. Access Compliance submittals to CSU Where applicable, the CSU building official or campus deputy building official provides the certification. The architect of record shall coordinate with the campus for submittal instructions in these cases. Access compliance review by CSU systemwide plan check firms Campuses may continue to authorize systemwide plan check firms to provide access compliance reviews recognizing that this does not substitute for DSA or campus deputy building official certification. Although DSA review and approval is required in most situations, an access compliance review by CSU plan check firms performed concurrently, but separately, from the DSA review does provide a knowledgeable opinion of access compliance and may be useful for internal evaluation by Office of the Chancellor.
Opinion No. 1: Costs incurred by Operator in procuring abstracts and title examination (including preliminary, supplemental, shut-in gas royalty opinions and division under title opinions) shall be a party of the administrative overhead as provided in Exhibit “C”, and shall not be a direct charge, whether performed by Operator’s staff attorneys or by outside attorneys.
