Peer/LHIN Review of Improvement Plan Sample Clauses

Peer/LHIN Review of Improvement Plan. If Hospital performance under the Improvement Plan does not improve in accordance with the Improvement Plan, or if the Hospital is unable to develop an Improvement Plan satisfactory to the LHIN, the LHIN may appoint an independent team to assist the Hospital to develop an Improvement Plan or revise an existing Improvement Plan. The independent team will include a representative from another hospital selected with input from the Ontario Hospital Association. The independent team will work closely with the representatives from the Hospital and the LHIN. The Hospital will submit a new Improvement Plan or revisions to an existing Improvement Plan within 60 Days of the appointment of the independent team or within such other time as may be agreed to by the parties.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (24)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Peer/LHIN Review of Improvement Plan. If Hospital performance under the Improvement Plan does not improve in accordance with the Improvement Plan, or if the Hospital is unable to dev lop an Improvement Plan satisfactory to the LHIN, the LHIN may appoint an independent d team to assist the Hospital to develop an Improvement Plan or revise an existing Improvement Plan. The independent team will include a representative from another hospital selected with input from the Ontario Hospital Association. The independent team will work closely with the representatives from the Hospital and the LHIN. The Hospital will submit a new Improvement Plan or revisions to an existing Improvement Plan within 60 Days of the appointment of the independent team or within such other time as may be agreed to by the parties. There were non-substantive drafting changes to this section. Also, additional language adds flexibility to the 60 Day process for submission of a new Improvement Plan after the appointment of an independent team. t permits the LHIN and hospital to etermine a different timeframe for submission of a new Improvement Plan.
Sample 1

Related to Peer/LHIN Review of Improvement Plan

  • Improvement Plan A written plan developed by the evaluator, utilized when a teacher received a Rating of Ineffective on his/her Evaluation or on any individual deficiency in the evaluation system.

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Concession Area, including its abandonment.

  • Project Work Plan The Statement of Work is the formal document incorporated into the Grant. The Project Work Plan documents how the Grantee will achieve the performance measures outlined in the Grant. Changes to the Statement of Work require an amendment. Project Work Plans may be changed with written approval from PEI and the Grantee.

  • Work Plan Coordinate a work plan including a list of the proposed meetings and coordination activities, and related tasks to be performed, a schedule and an estimate. The work plan must satisfy the requirements of the project and must be approved by the State prior to commencing work.

  • Synchronization, Commissioning and Commercial Operation 4.1.1 The Power Producer shall give at least fifteen (15) days written notice to the SLDC / ALDC / DISCOM as the case may be, of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System. 4.1.2 Subject to Article 4.1.1, the Power Project may be synchronized by the Power Producer to the Grid System when it meets all the connection conditions prescribed in the Grid Code and otherwise meets all other Indian legal requirements for synchronization to the Grid System. 4.1.3 The synchronization equipment and all necessary arrangements / equipment including Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) for scheduling of power generated from the Project and transmission of data to the concerned authority as per applicable regulation shall be installed by the Power Producer at its generation facility of the Power Project at its own cost. The Power Producer shall synchronize its system with the Grid System only after the approval of GETCO / SLDC / ALDC and GEDA. 4.1.4 The Power Producer shall immediately after each synchronization / tripping of generator, inform the sub-station of the Grid System to which the Power Project is electrically connected in accordance with applicable Grid Code. 4.1.5 The Power Producer shall commission the Project within SCOD. 4.1.6 The Power Producer shall be required to obtain Developer and/ or Transfer Permission, Key Plan drawing etc, if required, from GEDA. In cases of conversion of land from Agricultural to Non-Agriculture, the commissioning shall be taken up by GEDA only upon submission of N.A. permission by the Power Producer. 4.1.7 The Power Producer shall be required to follow the Forecasting and Scheduling procedures as per the Regulations issued by Hon’ble GERC from time to time. It is to clarify that in terms of GERC (Forecasting, Scheduling, Deviation Settlement and Related Matters of Solar and Wind Generation Sources) Regulations, 2019 the procedures for Forecasting, Scheduling & Deviation Settlment are applicable to all solar generators having combined installed capacity above 1 MW connected to the State Grid / Substation including those connected via pooling stations.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!