Common use of Permanent Teacher Intervention Program Clause in Contracts

Permanent Teacher Intervention Program. Mandatory 13.1.2.1 This component shall provide intervention to permanent teachers who receive two (2) consecutive “unsatisfactory” observations. Participation in this component is mandatory. A permanent teacher who receives “unsatisfactory” observations will enter a ten-week Pre-Assistance Program per Article 9.7. 13.1.2.1.1 An “unsatisfactory” observation will be based on Article 9.7.1.1 of this agreement. The observation shall reflect an overall “unsatisfactory performance as related to the adopted Standards for the Teaching Profession. 13.1.2.2 The purpose of this Program is to assist and offer remediation to permanent teachers whose performance has been observed as “unsatisfactory” by the principal /designee. The prime focus of this Program is to provide assistance to renew quality teaching. 13.1.2.2.1 This Program shall not deal with teacher’s employment issues which may arise due to accusations of neglect of duty or misconduct. 13.1.2.3 Assistance and remedial efforts shall be intense and multifaceted, and shall be preceded by a conference when the teacher receives the “unsatisfactory” evaluation. The conference shall involve the teacher being referred, the evaluator who evaluated the teacher, and the Consulting Teacher. If the referred teacher so desired, Federation shall also provide representation. At this conference, the reasons for the “unsatisfactory” evaluation will be presented. Then, an Individual Learning Plan to renew quality teaching will be developed by those present. 13.1.2.3.1 The course of assistance shall include one or more of the following: a) Multiple classroom observations by the Consulting Teacher. b) Opportunities for the permanent teacher to observe exemplary practice either by the Consulting Teacher or other exemplary teachers. c) District provided professional development opportunities. d) Assistance specific to the area which has been evaluated “unsatisfactory.” e) Assistance in areas deemed in need of assistance by the consulting or Evaluating Teacher during the period of assistance. f) Conference attendance where material facilitates and fits into the Individual Learning Plan. g) The parties understand that every possible subject matter competency may not be available with the District, and therefore it shall occasionally be necessary to secure additional assistance to fully address identified deficiencies. In such cases, the Consulting Teacher shall maintain prime responsibility for assuring the availability of appropriate resources. 13.1.2.4 During the period of assistance, the permanent teacher's evaluation shall be the joint responsibility of the Evaluating Teacher and the principal or designee. It is the intent of the parties that this process serves as the sole evaluation process for the permanent teacher. 13.1.2.5 The assistance provided by the Consulting Teacher shall be closely monitored by the Panel. 13.1.2.6 Nothing in Article 13 precludes the principal or District from doing informal observations nor from notifying the teacher verbally and/or in writing regarding incidents or events related to the teacher's fulfillment of professional obligation. 13.1.2.6.1 Should the principal or District deem it necessary to communicate with a teacher in this Program in a manner that related to progressive discipline, such as letter of warning, reprimand, etc., they shall copy the Consulting Teacher and the Panel. 13.1.2.6.2 The Evaluating Teacher will share all written evaluations during a conference with the permanent teacher and Consulting Teacher. A cover copy of the written evaluation will be provided to the principal and the Panel. 13.1.2.7 The principal, or designee, will share all written evaluations during a conference with the permanent teacher and Consulting Teacher. A cover copy of the written evaluation will be provided to the Evaluating Teacher and the Panel. 13.1.2.8 Permanent Teacher Due Process Rights 13.1.2.8.1 The permanent teacher shall be entitled to review all reports generated by the Evaluating Teacher and/or principal, or designee, prior to their submission to the Panel and to have affixed thereto their comments. To effectuate this right, the Evaluating Teacher and/or principal, or designee, shall provide the permanent teacher with copies of such evaluation at least five (5) working days prior to any Panel meeting. 13.1.2.8.2 The permanent teacher shall have a right to be represented by Federation in any meeting of the Panel and shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present their point of view concerning any report being made. 13.1.2.8.3 The permanent teacher shall have the right to present reasons why a specific Consulting Teacher should be replaced with another Consulting Teacher, and to have those reasons considered by the Panel. The Panel shall have the final authority to substitute Consulting Teachers.

Permanent Teacher Intervention Program. Mandatory 13.1.2.1 10.9.2.1 This component shall provide intervention to permanent teachers who receive two (2) consecutive “unsatisfactory” observationsare directed by the District to participate in PAR pursuant to Article 9.8.3 of the Evaluation Article. Participation in this component is the PAR program will be mandatory. A permanent teacher who receives “unsatisfactory” observations will enter a ten-week Pre-Assistance Program per Article 9.7. 13.1.2.1.1 An “unsatisfactory” observation will be based on Article 9.7.1.1 of this agreement. The observation shall reflect an overall “unsatisfactory performance as related to the adopted Standards for the Teaching Profession. 13.1.2.2 10.9.2.2 The purpose of this Program is to assist and offer remediation to 74 permanent teachers whose performance has been observed rated as “unsatisfactoryDoes Not Meet Standards/Unsatisfactory” by the principal /designeeadministrator through the evaluation process, which is reflected in the Summative Evaluation Form. The prime focus of this Program is to provide assistance to renew quality teaching. 13.1.2.2.1 10.9.2.3 This Program shall not deal with teacher’s employment issues which may arise due unrelated to accusations of neglect of duty or misconductthe observation and evaluation process. 13.1.2.3 10.9.2.4 Assistance and remedial efforts shall be intense and multifaceted, multifaceted and shall be preceded by a conference when the teacher receives the “unsatisfactoryDoes Not Meet Standards/Unsatisfactory” evaluationSummative Evaluation. The conference shall involve the teacher being referred, the evaluator who evaluated the teacher, and the Consulting Teacher. If the referred teacher so desireddesires, Federation the Association shall also provide representation. At this conference, the reasons for the “unsatisfactoryDoes Not Meet Standards/Unsatisfactory” evaluation Summative Evaluation will be presented. Then, an Individual Learning Plan to renew quality teaching will be developed by those present. 13.1.2.3.1 10.9.2.5 The course of assistance shall include one or more of the following: a) Multiple classroom observations by the Consulting Teacher. b) Opportunities for the permanent teacher to observe exemplary practice either by the Consulting Teacher or other exemplary teachers. c) District provided professional development opportunities. d) Assistance specific to the area which that has been evaluated as “unsatisfactory.” e) Assistance in areas deemed in need of assistance by the consulting or Evaluating Consulting Teacher during the period of assistance. f) Conference attendance where material facilitates and fits into the Individual Learning Plan. g) The parties understand that every possible subject matter competency may not be available with the Districtdistrict, and therefore therefore, it shall occasionally be necessary to secure additional assistance to fully address identified deficiencies. In such cases, the Consulting Teacher shall maintain prime responsibility for assuring the availability of appropriate resources. 13.1.2.4 10.9.2.6 During the period of assistance, the permanent teacher's evaluation shall be the joint responsibility of the Evaluating Teacher and the principal or designee. It is the intent of the parties that this process serves as the sole evaluation process for the permanent teacher. 13.1.2.5 10.9.2.7 The assistance provided by the Consulting Teacher shall be closely monitored by the PanelJoint Committee. 13.1.2.6 10.9.2.8 Nothing in Article 13 10 precludes the principal or District from doing informal observations nor from notifying the teacher and providing feedback verbally and/or in writing regarding incidents or events related to the teacher's fulfillment of professional obligationwriting. 13.1.2.6.1 Should the principal or District deem it necessary to communicate with a teacher in this Program in a manner that related to progressive discipline, such as letter of warning, reprimand, etc., they shall copy the Consulting Teacher and the Panel. 13.1.2.6.2 The Evaluating Teacher will share all written evaluations during a conference with the permanent teacher and Consulting Teacher. A cover copy of the written evaluation will be provided to the principal and the Panel. 13.1.2.7 The principal, or designee, will share all written evaluations during a conference with the permanent teacher and Consulting Teacher. A cover copy of the written evaluation will be provided to the Evaluating Teacher and the Panel. 13.1.2.8 Permanent Teacher Due Process Rights 13.1.2.8.1 The permanent teacher shall be entitled to review all reports generated by the Evaluating Teacher and/or principal, or designee, prior to their submission to the Panel and to have affixed thereto their comments. To effectuate this right, the Evaluating Teacher and/or principal, or designee, shall provide the permanent teacher with copies of such evaluation at least five (5) working days prior to any Panel meeting. 13.1.2.8.2 The permanent teacher shall have a right to be represented by Federation in any meeting of the Panel and shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present their point of view concerning any report being made. 13.1.2.8.3 The permanent teacher shall have the right to present reasons why a specific Consulting Teacher should be replaced with another Consulting Teacher, and to have those reasons considered by the Panel. The Panel shall have the final authority to substitute Consulting Teachers.

Permanent Teacher Intervention Program. Mandatory 13.1.2.1 This component shall provide intervention to permanent teachers who receive two (2) consecutive “unsatisfactory” observations. Participation in this component is mandatory. A permanent teacher who receives “unsatisfactory” observations will enter a ten-week Pre-Assistance Program per Article 9.7. 13.1.2.1.1 An “unsatisfactory” observation will be based on Article 9.7.1.1 of this agreement. The observation shall reflect an overall “unsatisfactory performance as related to the adopted Standards for the Teaching Profession. 13.1.2.2 The purpose of this Program is to assist and offer remediation to permanent teachers whose performance has been observed as “unsatisfactory” by the principal /designee. The prime focus of this Program is to provide assistance to renew quality teaching. 13.1.2.2.1 This Program shall not deal with teacher’s employment issues issues, which may arise due to accusations of neglect of duty or misconduct. 13.1.2.3 Assistance and remedial efforts shall be intense and multifaceted, and shall be preceded by a conference when the teacher receives the “unsatisfactory” evaluation. The conference shall involve the teacher being referred, the evaluator who evaluated the teacher, and the Consulting Teacher. If the referred teacher so desired, Federation shall also provide representation. At this conference, the reasons for the “unsatisfactory” evaluation will be presented. Then, an Individual Learning Plan to renew quality teaching will be developed by those present. 13.1.2.3.1 The course of assistance shall include one or more of the following: a) Multiple classroom observations by the Consulting Teacher. b) Opportunities for the permanent teacher to observe exemplary practice either by the Consulting Teacher or other exemplary teachers. c) District provided professional development opportunities. d) Assistance specific to the area which has been evaluated “unsatisfactory.” e) Assistance in areas deemed in need of assistance by the consulting or Evaluating Teacher during the period of assistance. f) Conference attendance where material facilitates and fits into the Individual Learning Plan. g) The parties understand that every possible subject matter competency may not be available with the Districtdistrict, and therefore it shall occasionally be necessary to secure additional assistance to fully address identified deficiencies. In such cases, the Consulting Teacher shall maintain prime responsibility for assuring the availability of appropriate resources. 13.1.2.4 During the period of assistance, the permanent teacher's evaluation shall be the joint responsibility of the Evaluating Teacher and the principal or designee. It is the intent of the parties that this process serves as the sole evaluation process for the permanent teacher. 13.1.2.5 The assistance provided by the Consulting Teacher shall be closely monitored by the Panel. 13.1.2.6 Nothing in Article 13 precludes the principal or District from doing informal observations nor from notifying the teacher verbally and/or in writing regarding incidents or events related to the teacher's fulfillment of professional obligation. 13.1.2.6.1 Should the principal or District deem it necessary to communicate with a teacher in this Program in a manner that related to progressive discipline, such as letter of warning, reprimand, etc., they he/she shall copy the Consulting Teacher and the Panel. 13.1.2.6.2 The Evaluating Teacher will share all written evaluations during a conference with the permanent teacher and Consulting Teacher. A cover copy of the written evaluation will be provided to the principal and the Panel. 13.1.2.7 The principal, or designee, will share all written evaluations during a conference with the permanent teacher and Consulting Teacher. A cover copy of the written evaluation will be provided to the Evaluating Teacher and the Panel. 13.1.2.8 Permanent Teacher Due Process Rights 13.1.2.8.1 The permanent teacher shall be entitled to review all reports generated by the Evaluating Teacher and/or principal, or designee, prior to their submission to the Panel and to have affixed thereto their his/her comments. To effectuate this right, the Evaluating Teacher and/or principal, or designee, shall provide the permanent teacher with copies of such evaluation at least five (5) working days prior to any Panel meeting. 13.1.2.8.2 The permanent teacher shall have a right to be represented by Federation in any meeting of the Panel and shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present their his/her point of view concerning any report being made. 13.1.2.8.3 The permanent teacher shall have the right to present reasons why a specific Consulting Teacher should be replaced with another Consulting Teacher, and to have those reasons considered by the Panel. The Panel shall have the final authority to substitute Consulting Teachers.

Permanent Teacher Intervention Program. Mandatory 13.1.2.1 This component shall provide intervention to permanent teachers who receive two (2) consecutive “unsatisfactory” observations. Participation in this component is mandatory. A permanent teacher who receives “unsatisfactory” observations will enter a ten-week Pre-Assistance Program per Article 9.7. 13.1.2.1.1 An “unsatisfactory” observation will be based on ArticleArticle 9. 9.7.1.1 7.1.1 of this agreement. The observation shall reflect an overall “unsatisfactory performance as related to the adopted Standards for the Teaching Profession. 13.1.2.2 The purpose of this Program is to assist and offer remediation to permanent teachers whose performance has been observed as “unsatisfactory” by the principal /designee. The prime focus of this Program is to provide assistance to renew quality teaching. 13.1.2.2.1 This Program shall not deal with teacher’s employment issues issues, which may arise due to accusations of neglect of duty or misconduct. 13.1.2.3 Assistance and remedial efforts shall be intense and multifaceted, and shall be preceded by a conference when the teacher receives the “unsatisfactory” evaluation. The conference shall involve the teacher being referred, the evaluator who evaluated the teacher, and the Consulting Teacher. If the referred teacher so desired, Federation shall also provide representation. At this conference, the reasons for the “unsatisfactory” evaluation will be presented. Then, an Individual Learning Plan to renew quality teaching will be developed by those present. 13.1.2.3.1 The course of assistance shall include one or more of the following: a) Multiple classroom observations by the Consulting Teacher. b) Opportunities for the permanent teacher to observe exemplary practice either by the Consulting Teacher or other exemplary teachers. c) District provided professional development opportunities. d) Assistance specific to the area which has been evaluated “unsatisfactory.” e) Assistance in areas deemed in need of assistance by the consulting or Evaluating Teacher during the period of assistance. f) Conference attendance where material facilitates and fits into the Individual Learning Plan. g) The parties understand that every possible subject matter competency may not be available with the Districtdistrict, and therefore it shall occasionally be necessary to secure additional assistance to fully address identified deficiencies. In such cases, the Consulting Teacher shall maintain prime responsibility for assuring the availability of appropriate resources. 13.1.2.4 During the period of assistance, the permanent teacher's evaluation shall be the joint responsibility of the Evaluating Teacher and the principal or designee. It is the intent of the parties that this process serves as the sole evaluation process for the permanent teacher. 13.1.2.5 The assistance provided by the Consulting Teacher shall be closely monitored by the Panel. 13.1.2.6 Nothing in Article 13 precludes the principal or District from doing informal observations nor from notifying the teacher verbally and/or in writing regarding incidents or events related to the teacher's fulfillment of professional obligation. 13.1.2.6.1 Should the principal or District deem it necessary to communicate with a teacher in this Program in a manner that related to progressive discipline, such as letter of warning, reprimand, etc., they he/she shall copy the Consulting Teacher and the Panel. 13.1.2.6.2 The Evaluating Teacher will share all written evaluations during a conference with the permanent teacher and Consulting Teacher. A cover copy of the written evaluation will be provided to the principal and the Panel. 13.1.2.7 The principal, or designee, will share all written evaluations during a conference with the permanent teacher and Consulting Teacher. A cover copy of the written evaluation will be provided to the Evaluating Teacher and the Panel. 13.1.2.8 Permanent Teacher Due Process Rights 13.1.2.8.1 The permanent teacher shall be entitled to review all reports generated by the Evaluating Teacher and/or principal, or designee, prior to their submission to the Panel and to have affixed thereto their his/her comments. To effectuate this right, the Evaluating Teacher and/or principal, or designee, shall provide the permanent teacher with copies of such evaluation at least five (5) working days prior to any Panel meeting. 13.1.2.8.2 The permanent teacher shall have a right to be represented by Federation in any meeting of the Panel and shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present their his/her point of view concerning any report being made. 13.1.2.8.3 The permanent teacher shall have the right to present reasons why a specific Consulting Teacher should be replaced with another Consulting Teacher, and to have those reasons considered by the Panel. The Panel shall have the final authority to substitute Consulting Teachers.

Permanent Teacher Intervention Program. Mandatory 13.1.2.1 This component shall provide intervention to permanent teachers who receive two (2) consecutive “unsatisfactory” observations. Participation in this component is mandatory. A permanent teacher who receives “unsatisfactory” observations will enter a ten-week Pre-Assistance Program per Article 9.7. 13.1.2.1.1 An “unsatisfactory” observation will be based on Article 9.7.1.1 of this agreement. The observation shall reflect an overall “unsatisfactory performance as related to the adopted Standards for the Teaching Profession. 13.1.2.2 The purpose of this Program is to assist and offer remediation to permanent teachers whose performance has been observed as “unsatisfactory” by the principal /designee. The prime focus of this Program is to provide assistance to renew quality teaching. 13.1.2.2.1 This Program shall not deal with teacher’s employment issues issues, which may arise due to accusations of neglect of duty or misconduct. 13.1.2.3 Assistance and remedial efforts shall be intense and multifaceted, and shall be preceded by a conference when the teacher receives the “unsatisfactory” evaluation. The conference shall involve the teacher being referred, the evaluator who evaluated the teacher, and the Consulting Teacher. If the referred teacher so desired, Federation shall also provide representation. At this conference, the reasons for the “unsatisfactory” evaluation will be presented. Then, an Individual Learning Plan to renew quality teaching will be developed by those present. 13.1.2.3.1 The course of assistance shall include one or more of the following: a) Multiple classroom observations by the Consulting Teacher. b) Opportunities for the permanent teacher to observe exemplary practice either by the Consulting Teacher or other exemplary teachers. c) District provided professional development opportunities. d) Assistance specific to the area which has been evaluated “unsatisfactory.” e) Assistance in areas deemed in need of assistance by the consulting or Evaluating Teacher during the period of assistance. f) Conference attendance where material facilitates and fits into the Individual Learning Plan. g) The parties understand that every possible subject matter competency may not be available with the Districtdistrict, and therefore it shall occasionally be necessary to secure additional assistance to fully address identified deficiencies. In such cases, the Consulting Teacher shall maintain prime responsibility for assuring the availability of appropriate resources. 13.1.2.4 During the period of assistance, the permanent teacher's evaluation shall be the joint responsibility of the Evaluating Teacher and the principal or designee. It is the intent of the parties that this process serves as the sole evaluation process for the permanent teacher. 13.1.2.5 The assistance provided by the Consulting Teacher shall be closely monitored by the Panel. 13.1.2.6 Nothing in Article 13 precludes the principal or District from doing informal observations nor from notifying the teacher verbally and/or in writing regarding incidents or events related to the teacher's fulfillment of professional obligation.the 13.1.2.6.1 Should the principal or District deem it necessary to communicate with a teacher in this Program in a manner that related to progressive discipline, such as letter of warning, reprimand, etc., they he/she shall copy the Consulting Teacher and the Panel. 13.1.2.6.2 The Evaluating Teacher will share all written evaluations during a conference with the permanent teacher and Consulting Teacher. A cover copy of the written evaluation will be provided to the principal and the Panel. 13.1.2.7 The principal, or designee, will share all written evaluations during a conference with the permanent teacher and Consulting Teacher. A cover copy of the written evaluation will be provided to the Evaluating Teacher and the Panel. 13.1.2.8 Permanent Teacher Due Process Rights 13.1.2.8.1 The permanent teacher shall be entitled to review all reports generated by the Evaluating Teacher and/or principal, or designee, prior to their submission to the Panel and to have affixed thereto their his/her comments. To effectuate this right, the Evaluating Teacher and/or principal, or designee, shall provide the permanent teacher with copies of such evaluation at least five (5) working days prior to any Panel meeting. 13.1.2.8.2 The permanent teacher shall have a right to be represented by Federation in any meeting of the Panel and shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present their his/her point of view concerning any report being made. 13.1.2.8.3 The permanent teacher shall have the right to present reasons why a specific Consulting Teacher should be replaced with another Consulting Teacher, and to have those reasons considered by the Panel. The Panel shall have the final authority to substitute Consulting Teachers.