Position Review - Appeals Sample Clauses

Position Review - Appeals. In the event that the employee disagrees with the decision, and chooses to appeal, the employee must request that the Union initiate an appeal. The request must be in writing to the Union, with a copy to Human Resources and the employee’s immediate management supervisor, and made within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the written position review decision from Human Resources. If an appeal is not initiated within this timeframe, the review will be considered concluded and no further employee initiated review can occur for twelve (12) months from the date of the written decision from Human Resources. Where the Union supports the employee’s appeal, the Union will request that the Company arrange for an appeal meeting with the Appeal Committee. The Appeal Committee will be comprised of the employee’s appropriate management supervisor, two (2) Human Resources representatives and two (2) recognized Union representatives with classification knowledge and experience. The Company will develop terms of reference for this Appeal Committee. Within forty-five (45) days of receipt of the written appeal from the Union, the Appeal Committee will meet to hear the appeal. The employee, the management supervisor and the Union may provide additional information for consideration by the Appeal Committee. Such additional information must be provided to Human Resources fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the date of the Appeal Committee meeting. It is understood that the decision of the Appeal Committee is final and binding for both parties.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Position Review - Appeals

  • Position Review ‌ The Employer may initiate a position review for a position it believes is improperly classified, and will inform the Union in writing when it has initiated a reallocation process for a bargaining unit position. An individual employee who believes that their position is improperly classified may request a review according to the following procedure:

  • Exclusion Review Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be:

  • Review and Appeal (a) Each Party shall establish or maintain judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative tribunals or procedures for the purpose of the prompt review and, where warranted, correction of final administrative actions regarding matters covered by this Treaty. Such tribunals shall be impartial and independent of the office or authority entrusted with administrative enforcement and shall not have any substantial interest in the outcome of the matter.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Review Stages The Project Architect shall submit documents to the Owner for review at completion of the Schematic Design Phase, Design Development Phase and at the following stages of completion of the Construction Documents Phase as follows: 50%, 75%, 100%

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Design Review At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.