Design Review.
(a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing.
(b) None of:
(i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier;
(ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or
(iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.
Design Review. Developer acknowledges and agrees that in reviewing and approving documents under this Section, Agency is acting as a legal entity separate and distinct from the City and that Agency’s actions in this regard are separate and distinct from the City’s conduct of its typical governmental functions and exercise of its police powers in its governmental capacity.
Design Review. At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.
Design Review. Consumer shall provide Holy Cross an electrical one-line diagram and a relaying and metering one-line diagram prior to completion of detailed designs, unless the Consumer is installing a packaged system that is pre-certified to IEEE 1547.1 and UL 1741 standards. Packaged systems pre-certified under IEEE Standard 1547.1 and UL Standard 1741 will not require a relaying and metering one-line diagram. The submitted application and diagrams will be processed, reviewed, and acted upon in accordance with the Holy Cross Interconnection Policy.
Design Review. The plans and specifications for each New Project shall be subject to Licensor’s review and, upon reasonable notice, inspection to ensure that they are in compliance with Brand Standards (subject to Project-specific variations to the Brand Standards that may be agreed to by the parties) and with Licensee’s obligations hereunder in accordance with the Design Review Addendum, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit G, and each such Project shall be submitted to Licensor’s design review process for review, comment, and approval. Licensee shall pay (or cause to be paid) to Licensor or its Affiliate a fixed fee for such review activities in accordance with the Design Review Addendum. Licensee agrees that, as between Licensee and its Affiliates on the one hand and Licensor and its Affiliates on the other hand, Licensee and its Affiliates (and not Licensor and its Affiliates) are responsible for: (i) ensuring that any design, construction documents, specifications, and any work related to the Projects complies with all Applicable Laws, including any requirements relating to disabled persons; (ii) any errors or omissions; or (iii) discrepancies of any nature in any drawings or specifications. Licensee further acknowledges and agrees that: (a) any review by Licensor or its Affiliates of plans for any Project is limited solely to determining whether the plans comply with the Brand Standards; and (b) Licensor and its Affiliates will have no liability or obligation with respect to the construction, conversion, renovation, upgrading or furnishing of the Projects other than as set forth in the Design Review Addendum.
Design Review. 1. The County shall submit elevation or relocation schematics with details to SHPO, who will then have thirty (30) days for review and comment. The County will consult with the SHPO to incorporate the recommended changes into the elevation or relocation documents.
2. The County will provide DHSES and GOSR and/or FEMA with a copy of the cover letter transmitting this information to SHPO, shall forward copies of the approved elevation schematics, and shall forward a copy of SHPO’s written comments.
Design Review. 10.1 In reviewing projects under this Agreement, the Design Review Board (“DRB”) will use the recently-adopted, site-specific design guidelines that supplement the Capitol Hill Neighborhood Design Guidelines, in addition to any other applicable guidelines. The recommendation of the DRB shall be consistent with this Agreement, but if there is a conflict between a DRB recommendation and the terms of this Agreement, the latter shall control.
10.2 The design and materials of the Plaza and NPE shall be compatible with the design and materials of the East Xxxxx Way Festival Street in order to create a uniform style and functionality among the private and public open spaces.
10.3 The City’s design review process shall be modified as follows for development of the Sites:
10.3.1 The developer of each Site shall be required to present only one design alternative in addition to the proposal at the Early Design Guidance meeting. The DRB will strive to hold no more than two meetings and will require no more than three; the developer may request additional meetings.
10.3.2 DPD will assign the proposals on all five Sites to the same planner, to the extent that the Department’s workload permits.
10.3.3 If one developer successfully bids on more than one Site, the DRB will accommodate a request by such developer to consider the Sites controlled by that developer as a package at the same DRB meetings.
10.4 The developer of each Site may request to go through the standard design review process without being subject to the modifications of that process provided in Section 10.3.
Design Review. Based on FEMA’s review of the scope of work and/or plans, if FEMA determines that the proposed Undertaking may adversely affect historic properties FEMA will include a comment in its review of the project; project worksheet; or subgrant application that requires the Recipient and/or subrecipient to provide additional information to FEMA during plan development.
1. FEMA will request that the Recipient(s) and subrecipient revise the scope of work to substantially conform to the Standards as described in Stipulation II.C.5.b, or alternatively to identify and assess feasible alternatives, if any, which may avoid or minimize the adverse effect. Prior to project implementation, the Recipient(s) and subrecipient will provide this information to FEMA with sufficiently developed plans, and FEMA will provide the written alternatives assessment and plans to SHPO and/or participating Tribe(s) for a fifteen (15)-day review and comment period.
2. If FEMA, in consultation with Recipient(s), subrecipient, SHPO, and/or participating Tribe(s), and other consulting parties, as appropriate, determines that plans avoid the potential adverse effect, then design review is complete and the responsible entity is not required to carry out any additional Treatment Measures that may have been identified to offset the potential adverse effect; or
3. If FEMA in consultation with Recipient(s), subrecipient, SHPO, and/or participating Tribe(s), and other consulting parties, as appropriate, determines that the plans do not avoid an adverse effect, FEMA will forward comments, if any, from SHPO and/or participating Tribe(s), or other consulting parties to the Recipient(s) and subrecipient and request that the subrecipient consider the comments in the development of the final construction documents. Recipient(s) and subrecipient will provide a written response to the comments to FEMA, and FEMA will forward this response to SHPO, and/or participating Tribe(s), and other consulting parties, and the responsible entity will implement any additional Treatment Measures.
Design Review. DRPT will design and aesthetically treat any elements of the Project, as illustrated in Appendix A, introduced into NPS-administered properties to be compatible with the character of existing resources and appropriate for the context of Washington DC’s Monumental Core
a. Minimization: Design review will be executed to minimize potential adverse effects of introducing new features into the historic districts.
b. DRPT, in consultation with FRA, will consult with DC SHPO, VDHR, NPS, NCPC and CFA pursuant to Stipulation III.A as engineering and design are progressed including final engineering and design documents. Design Review will address, but is not limited to the following unresolved design elements: a) new railroad bridge design and engineering, including structure type, vertical clearance, visual appearance of the structural system, and alignment; b) aesthetic treatment of new component bridges or other structures introduced into NPS-administered properties; c) landscape design within the limits of disturbance of the Project; d) any additional signage or lighting necessitated by the Project; e) design of the bike-pedestrian crossing and any associated access ramps and trail connections; and f) construction staging and access procedures.
Design Review. Immersion is entitled to conduct periodic design reviews to ensure its satisfaction with the Services. Upon reasonable notice, KLSI shall allow Immersion during normal business hours, to visit its places of business for development and manufacturing to discuss and inspect the status of the development of the Product.
