Common use of Post-Tenure Review Clause in Contracts

Post-Tenure Review. The post-tenure review process is generally intended to be a formative rather than a summative process of faculty evaluation, focused on faculty development. It is not intended to be the equivalent of the probationary evaluation of tenure track faculty. The process should review and encourage ongoing development, scholarship, and productivity, including feedback concerning progress toward promotion where applicable. Alleged violation of this intent language is subject solely to the complaint process in Article 7. a. Post-Tenure Review Process Every six (6) years, tenured UNAC bargaining unit members shall be evaluated comprehensively. A scheduled review will occur six (6) years from the date of the UNAC bargaining unit member’s most recent post-tenure review or successful promotion review was initiated. A successful promotion “resets the clock” and the next post-tenure review will occur six (6) years after the initiation of the review process. These evaluations shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Article. The UNAC bargaining unit member shall submit a file including the following documents: 1. Current CV; 2. Annual workload assignments for the period under review; 3. A cumulative activity report for the period under review;

Post-Tenure Review. The post-tenure review process is generally intended to be a formative rather than a summative process of faculty evaluation, focused on faculty development. It is not intended to be the equivalent of the probationary evaluation of tenure track faculty. The process should review and encourage ongoing development, scholarship, and productivity, including feedback concerning progress toward promotion where applicable. Alleged violation of this intent language is subject solely to the complaint process in Article 7. a. Post-Tenure Review Process Every six (6) years, tenured UNAC bargaining unit members shall be evaluated comprehensively. A scheduled review will occur six (6) years from the date of the UNAC bargaining unit member’s most recent post-tenure review or successful promotion review was initiated. A successful promotion “resets the clock” and the next post-tenure review will occur six (6) years after the initiation of the review process. These evaluations shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Article. The UNAC bargaining unit member shall submit a file including the following documents: 1. Current CV; 2. Annual workload assignments for the period under review; 3. A cumulative activity report for the period under review;

Post-Tenure Review. The post-tenure review process is generally intended to be a formative rather than a summative process of faculty evaluation, focused on faculty development. It is not intended to be the equivalent of the probationary evaluation of tenure track faculty. The process should review and encourage ongoing development, scholarship, and productivity, including feedback concerning progress toward promotion where applicable. Alleged violation of this intent language is subject solely to the complaint process in Article 7. a. Post-Tenure Review Process Every six (6) years, tenured UNAC bargaining unit members shall be evaluated comprehensively. A scheduled review will occur six (6) years from the date of the UNAC bargaining unit member’s most recent post-tenure review or successful promotion review was initiated. A successful promotion “resets the clock” and the next post-tenure review will occur six (6) years after the initiation of the review process. These evaluations shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in this ArticleaArticle. The UNAC bargaining unit member shall submit a file including the following documents: 1. Current CV; 2. Annual workload assignments for the period under review; 3. A cumulative activity report for the period under review;