Common use of Post Tenure Reviews Clause in Contracts

Post Tenure Reviews. A. Tenured faculty members will be evaluated by the DPRC once every three years for associate professors and every five years for full professors, with recommendations made to the xxxx and xxxxxxx. Such evaluations will be on a staggered basis across faculty within a division determined at the beginning of each academic year. B. The purposes of post-tenure review are to: 1. Assure continued excellence in the academy; 2. Offer appropriate feedback and professional development opportunities to tenured faculty; 3. Clearly link the level of remuneration to faculty members’ performance; 4. Provide accountability to the institution, public, and Board (OAR 580-021- 0140; - 0135; -005 et seq.; IMD 4.002). C. Tenured faculty members will submit the following according to “PRC process deadlines” in Section 6.D: 1. Copies of the Annual Faculty Reports for the evaluation period; 2. Examples of teaching/librarianship, scholarship, and service that define their continued contributions to the profession; 3. Copies of the written summary of at least one observation of classroom teaching by the division chair or their designee (or equivalent review of on- line Learning Management System (LMS) platform material if primarily an on-line instructor); 4. An updated CV; and 5. Data from the mutually agreed upon student course evaluation instrument (SCEI*), provided by the University. D. The DPRC recommendation and the material provided under Article 8, Section 7, C.1-5 are forwarded to the college xxxx for acceptance and review. Each xxxx will provide written feedback to be shared with the faculty member and forward a summary along with the Annual Faculty Report to the xxxxxxx which will then become a part of the faculty member’s permanent personnel records.

Post Tenure Reviews. A. Tenured X. Xxxxxxx faculty members will be evaluated by the DPRC once every three years for associate professors and every five years for full professors, with recommendations made to the xxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxPresident. Such evaluations will be on a staggered basis across faculty within a division Division determined at the beginning of each academic year. B. The purposes of post-tenure review are to: 1. Assure continued excellence in the academy; 2. Offer appropriate feedback and professional development opportunities to tenured faculty; 3. Clearly link the level of remuneration to faculty members’ performance; 4. Provide accountability to the institution, public, and Board (OAR 580-021- 021-0140; - 0135; -005 et seq.; IMD 4.002). C. Tenured faculty members will submit the following according to “PRC process deadlines” in Section 6.Dthe respective Division Chair and DPRC by June 30: 1. Copies of the Annual Faculty Reports for the evaluation period; 2. Examples of teaching/librarianship, scholarship, and service that define their continued contributions to the profession; 3. Copies of the written summary of at least one observation of classroom teaching by the division chair Division Chair or their designee (or equivalent review of on- line Learning Management System (LMS) platform material if primarily an on-line instructor)designee; 4. An updated CV; and 5. Data from the mutually agreed upon student course evaluation instrument (SCEI*), provided by the University. D. The DPRC recommendation and the material provided under Article 8, Section 7, C.1-5 4 are forwarded to the college xxxx College Xxxx for acceptance and review. Each xxxx Xxxx will provide written feedback to be shared with the faculty member and forward a summary along with the Annual Faculty Report to the xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx which will then become a part of the faculty member’s permanent personnel records.

Post Tenure Reviews. A. Tenured faculty members will be evaluated by the DPRC once every three years for associate professors and every five years for full professors, with recommendations made to the xxxx Xxxx and xxxxxxxXxxxxxx. Such evaluations will be on a staggered basis across faculty within a division Division determined at the beginning of each academic year. B. The purposes of post-tenure review are to: 1. Assure continued excellence in the academy; 2. Offer appropriate feedback and professional development opportunities to tenured faculty; 3. Clearly link the level of remuneration to faculty members’ performance; 4. Provide accountability to the institution, public, and Board (OAR 580-021- 021-0140; - 0135; -005 et seq.; IMD 4.002). C. Tenured faculty members will submit the following according to “PRC process deadlines” in Section 6.Dthe respective Division Chair and DPRC by June 30: 1. Copies of the Annual Faculty Reports for the evaluation period; 2. Examples of teaching/librarianship, scholarship, and service that define their continued contributions to the profession; 3. Copies of the written summary of at least one observation of classroom teaching by the division chair Division Chair or their designee (or equivalent review of on- on-line Learning Management System (LMS) platform material if primarily an on-line instructor); 4. An updated CV; and 5. Data from the mutually agreed upon student course evaluation instrument (SCEI*), provided by the University. D. The DPRC recommendation and the material provided under Article 8, Section 7, C.1-5 4 are forwarded to the college xxxx College Xxxx for acceptance and review. Each xxxx Xxxx will provide written feedback to be shared with the faculty member and forward a summary along with the Annual Faculty Report to the xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx which will then become a part of the faculty member’s permanent personnel records.

Post Tenure Reviews. A. Tenured faculty members will be evaluated by the DPRC once every three years for associate professors and every five years for full professors, with recommendations made to the xxxx Xxxx and xxxxxxxXxxxxxx. Such evaluations will be on a staggered basis across faculty within a division Division determined at the beginning of each academic year. B. The purposes of post-tenure review are to: 1. Assure continued excellence in the academy; 2. Offer appropriate feedback and professional development opportunities to tenured faculty; 3. Clearly link the level of remuneration to faculty members’ performance; 4. Provide accountability to the institution, public, and Board (OAR 580-021- 0140; - 0135; -005 et seq.; IMD 4.002). C. Tenured faculty members will submit the following according to “PRC process deadlines” in Section 6.D6.D.: 1. Copies of the Annual Faculty Reports for the evaluation period; 2. Examples of teaching/librarianship, scholarship, and service that define their continued contributions to the profession; 3. Copies of the written summary of at least one observation of classroom teaching by the division chair Division Chair or their designee (or equivalent review of on- line Learning Management System (LMS) platform material if primarily an on-line instructor); 4. An updated CV; and 5. Data from the mutually agreed upon student course evaluation instrument (SCEI*), provided by the University. *Any survey not mutually agreed upon, along with any results / data derived from such questions and surveys, is not to be used for purposes of official evaluation unless a Faculty member chooses to include it. D. The DPRC recommendation and the material provided under Article 8, Section 7, C.1-5 4 are forwarded to the college xxxx College Xxxx for acceptance and review. Each xxxx Xxxx will provide written feedback to be shared with the faculty member and forward a summary along with the Annual Faculty Report to the xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx which will then become a part of the faculty member’s permanent personnel records.

Post Tenure Reviews. A. Tenured faculty members will be evaluated by the DPRC once every three years for associate professors and every five years for full professors, with recommendations made to the xxxx and xxxxxxx. Such evaluations will be on a staggered basis across faculty within a division determined at the beginning of each academic year. B. The purposes of post-tenure review are to: 1. Assure continued excellence in the academy; 2. Offer appropriate feedback and professional development opportunities to tenured faculty; 3. Clearly link the level of remuneration to faculty members’ performance; 4. Provide accountability to the institution, public, and Board (OAR 580-021- 0140; - 0135; -005 et seq.; IMD 4.002). C. Tenured faculty members will submit the following according to “PRC process deadlines” in Section 6.D: 1. Copies of the Annual Faculty Reports for the evaluation period; 2. Examples of teachinginstruction/librarianship, scholarship, and service that define their continued contributions to the profession; 3. Copies of the written summary of at least one observation of classroom teaching by the division chair or their designee (or equivalent review of on- line Learning Management System (LMS) platform material if primarily an on-line instructor); 4. An updated CV; and 5. Data from the mutually agreed upon student course evaluation instrument (SCEI*), provided by the University. D. The DPRC recommendation and the material provided under Article 8, Section 7, C.1-5 above are forwarded to the college xxxx for acceptance and review. Each The xxxx will provide written feedback to be shared with the faculty member and forward a summary along with the Annual Faculty Report to the xxxxxxx which will then become a part of the faculty member’s permanent personnel records.

Post Tenure Reviews. A. Tenured faculty members will be evaluated by the DPRC once every three years for associate professors and every five years for full professors, with recommendations withrecommendations made to the xxxx Xxxx and xxxxxxxXxxxxxx. Such evaluations will be on a staggered basis across faculty within a division Division determined at the beginning of each academic year. B. The purposes of post-tenure review are to: 1. Assure continued excellence in the academy; 2. Offer appropriate feedback and professional development opportunities to tenured faculty; 3. Clearly link the level of remuneration to faculty members’ performance; 4. Provide accountability to the institution, public, and Board (OAR 580-021- 0140; - 0135; -005 et seq.; IMD 4.002). C. Tenured faculty members will submit the following according to “PRC process deadlines” in Section 6.D6.D.: 1. Copies of the Annual Faculty Reports for the evaluation period; 2. Examples of teaching/librarianship, scholarship, and service that define their continued contributions to the profession; 3. Copies of the written summary of at least one observation of classroom teaching by the division chair Division Chair or their designee (or equivalent review of on- line Learning Management System (LMS) platform material if primarily an on-line instructor); 4. An updated CV; and 5. Data from the mutually agreed upon student course evaluation instrument (SCEI*), provided by the University. D. The DPRC recommendation and the material provided under Article 8, Section 7, C.1-5 4 are forwarded to the college xxxx College Xxxx for acceptance and review. Each xxxx Xxxx will provide written feedback to be shared with the faculty member and forward a summary along with the Annual Faculty Report to the xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx which will then become a part of the faculty member’s permanent personnel records.