Previously Evaluated Properties. When previously evaluated properties are identified within an undertaking’s APE, Caltrans PQS shall review those previous evaluations to determine whether the previous evaluations are still valid or re-evaluate as appropriate. Indian tribes and other consulting parties shall be consulted during the review and re-evaluation process when properties to which those tribes or other consulting parties may attach religious or cultural significance are involved. The passage of time, changing perceptions of significance, eligibility under previously unconsidered NRHP criteria, new information, incomplete or erroneous prior evaluation, and errors of fact warrant such review and may require Caltrans to re-evaluate the properties.
Previously Evaluated Properties. Neither Caltrans nor the appropriate local agency is required to take additional steps to evaluate properties within the APE that were evaluated according to the National Register Criteria and that: 1) were determined not eligible pursuant to 36 CFR §800.4 or by the Keeper of the National Register (Keeper); 2) were determined eligible for the National Register pursuant to 36 CFR §800.4 or by the Keeper; or 3) are listed in the National Register. The historic properties may have been determined to be contributing elements to a historic district or determined eligible through a thematic nomination or survey such as the California Bridge Survey. Caltrans or the appropriate local agency may rely upon an earlier National Register determination unless Caltrans determines that the passage of time or changing perceptions of significance justify the reevaluation of any previously evaluated property. Bridges that were previously determined not eligible in the California Bridge Survey and that have reached fifty (50) years of age since 1987 shall require reevaluation. If Caltrans, or the appropriate local agency in consultation with Caltrans, determines that the earlier determination is still valid, Caltrans will document such finding in writing, retain the finding in its files, and include a record of the finding in the quarterly report to FHWA and SHPO. When either Caltrans or the appropriate local agency reevaluates any property and finds the earlier determination no longer valid, it shall reevaluate the property pursuant to Stipulation V.E, document its finding in writing, and retain such finding in its files. Caltrans will forward copies of the finding to FHWA and SHPO, as set forth in Stipulation V.E. SHPO, Council, or the Secretary of the Interior may request that FHWA and Xxxxxxxx reevaluate any property that may be affected by an undertaking covered by this PA or that FHWA obtain a determination from the Keeper, pursuant to applicable National Park Service regulations, 36 CFR Part 63.
Previously Evaluated Properties. The NRHP eligibility of heritage resources for which formal determinations were made more than ten years prior to the date of this Agreement shall be reconsidered by the FHRM regardless of the previous determination, by applying the NRHP criteria found at 36 CFR 60.4, in light of contemporary professional standards and changing perspectives regarding the significance of historic properties.
1. If the FHRM, after reconsidering NRHP eligibility or formal determination or listing by the Secretary of the Interior, agrees with the previous determination, the Forest may assume that the previous NRHP determination remains valid for the purposes of this Agreement. No formal consultation with the SHPO is required under such circumstances.
2. If the FHRM disagrees with the previous NRHP eligibility determination or formal determination or listing by the Secretary of the Interior, the Forest shall follow Stipulation VI.A. of this Agreement (requiring consultation pursuant to 36 CFR 800) if the property will be affected by the undertaking.
