Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 23, 2002, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and Cook Inlet/Voicestream Operating Company, LLC, By Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation (collectively “Voicestream”), filed a joint Petition for approval of the Fourth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated November 18, 2002 (the “Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) (the “Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxx Xxxxxx on behalf of Voicestream, stating that the facts contained in the Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January 7, 2003. Counsel for Ameritech Illinois and Staff appeared at the hearing and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. The Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 2329, 20022004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech SBC Illinois”) and Cook Inlet/Voicestream Operating CompanyNorlight Telecommunications, LLC, By Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation Inc. (collectively “VoicestreamNorlight”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of the Fourth Amendment to the a negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated November 18December 22, 2002 2004 (the “AmendmentAgreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the “Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of Ameritech SBC Illinois, and by Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, on behalf of VoicestreamNorlight, stating that the facts contained in the Petition are true and correct petition are, to the best of their knowledge, information, information and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Divisiontrue and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing before by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January 725, 20032005. Counsel for Ameritech Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which recommended the approval of the Amendment. At the hearing, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared at the hearing and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. The Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Statement, i.e., Staff Ex. 1, was admitted into evidence evidence, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 23May 16, 20022008, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech AT&T Illinois”) and Cook InletVertex Broadband, Corp. d/Voicestream Operating Company, LLC, By Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation b/a AthenaTel d/b/a Reason to Switch d/b/a TownLink Communications d/b/a INT Connections (collectively “VoicestreamVertex”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of the Fourth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated November 18May 7, 2002 (the “Amendment”), 2008 under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the “Act”). The Amendment Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, AT&T Illinois and by Xxx Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx on behalf of VoicestreamVertex, stating that the facts contained in the Petition petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing before a by the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January 7June 9, 20032008. Counsel for Ameritech Illinois Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on June 6, 2008. At the hearing on June 9, 2008, AT&T Illinois, Vertex and Staff appeared at the hearing and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. The Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 23August 19, 20022005, and pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech SBC Illinois”) and Cook Inlet/Voicestream Operating CompanyXO Communications Services, LLC, By Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation Inc. (collectively “VoicestreamXO Communications”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of the Fourth a 12th Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated November 18, 2002 their interconnection agreement (the “Amendment”), under that is dated August 10, 2005, and governed by Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the “Act”). The Amendment itself was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition instant petition was also filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of SBC Illinois, and by Xxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxx Xxxxxx on behalf of VoicestreamXO Communications , stating that the facts contained in the Petition are true and correct petition are, to the best of their knowledge, information, information and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Divisiontrue and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on was scheduled for hearing before by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January September 7, 20032005. Counsel for Ameritech Illinois and Prior to this hearing date, Staff appeared at filed the hearing and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. The Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. In his written statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommended the approval of the Amendment. The Administrative Law Judge waived the hearing in this matter and, by ruling, admitted the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx was admitted into evidence and marked the record was marked “Heard and Taken” on September 6 , 2005. See ALJ Notice (9-6-05).”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 23October 1, 20022001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and Cook Inlet/Voicestream Operating CompanyTelseon Carrier Services, LLC, By Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation Inc. (collectively “VoicestreamTelseon”), ) filed a joint Petition request for approval of the Fourth Amendment to the negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated November 18August 14, 2002 2001 (the “AmendmentAgreement”), under Section 252 Sections 252(a)(1) and (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151 151, et seq.) (“the “Act”). The Amendment Agreement was submitted with the Petitionrequest. A statement in support of the Petition request was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx X. Xxxxxx, Director of Negotiations for Ameritech and Xxxxxx on behalf of Ameritech IllinoisXxxxxx, and by Xxx Xxxxxx on behalf of VoicestreamGeneral Counsel for Xxxxxxx, stating that the facts contained in the Petition request for approval are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Divisioncorrect. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January 7October 17, 20032001. Counsel for Ameritech Illinois and Staff appeared at filed the hearing and agreed Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. Xx. Xxxxxxx recommended the approval of the Agreement. At the hearing, Staff indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. The Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx was admitted into evidence , and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 23May 5, 20022009, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech AT&T Illinois”) and Cook InletGlobalcom Inc. d/Voicestream Operating Company, LLC, By Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation b/a First Communications of Ohio (collectively “VoicestreamGlobalcom”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of the Fourth 8th Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated November 18April 29, 2002 (the “Amendment”)2009, under pursuant to Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151 § 252 et seq.) (“the “Act”). The Amendment to the Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, AT&T Illinois and by Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of VoicestreamGlobalcom, stating that the facts contained in the Petition petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing before a by the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January 7June 10, 20032009. Counsel for Ameritech Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on May 15, 2009. At the hearing on June 10, 2009, Globalcom did not appear. AT&T Illinois and Staff appeared at the hearing and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. The Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 23July 13, 20022001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and Cook Inlet/Voicestream Operating CompanyRCN Telecom Services of Illinois, LLC, By Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation Inc. (collectively “VoicestreamRCN”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of the Fourth First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated November May 18, 2002 2001 (the “AmendmentAgreement”), under Section Sections 252(a)(1) and 252 (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151 151, et seq.) (“the “Act”). The Amendment Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxx Xxxxxx X. Xxxx, on behalf of VoicestreamRCN, stating that the facts contained in the Petition petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing before by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January 7August 15, 20032001. Counsel for Ameritech Illinois and Staff appeared at filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on August 15, Staff and Ameritech appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. The Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”