Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On May 6, 2004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and Sage Telecom, Inc. (“Sage”), (collectively “Joint Petitioners”) filed a joint petition for approval of the First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated April 30, 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxx X. XxXxxxxxxx on behalf of Xxxx, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, a Status session was held in this matter on June 7, 2004. SBC Illinois, Sage, and Commission Staff appeared by counsel. Petitions for Leave to Intervene filed by AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc. (“AT&T”) and MCI, Inc. (“MCI”) were granted. Staff stated that it had not yet filed a Verified Statement in this docket. On June 14, Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. The Parties filed replies (AT&T and XXX filed a joint reply to Staff’s Verified Statement and joint Exceptions to the Proposed Order; they are identified herein as AT&T/MCI). This matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on June 25, 2004. SBC Illinois, Sage, AT&T, MCI, and Staff appeared. Xx. Xxxxxxxxx testified on behalf of the Verified Statement, which was admitted into evidence, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On May 6June 13, 20042005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell XxXxxx Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisMcNabb”) and Sage TelecomUnited States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, Inc. (“Sage”)LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#1, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#4, LLC, and USCOC of Rockford, LLC (collectively “Joint US Cellular”) (McNabb and US Cellular are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition for seeking the Commission’s approval of the First Amendment a negotiated traffic termination agreement (“Agreement”) entered into on or about May 13, 2005, pursuant to the Interconnection Agreement dated April 30, 2004, under Section 252 Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted filed with the petition. A joint petition and supported by the statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf Xxxxxx Xxxxx, General Manager of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxx X. XxXxxxxxxx on behalf of Xxxx, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and beliefXxXxxx. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commissiondue notice, a Status session hearing was held in this matter on June 7, 2004. SBC Illinois, Sage, and Commission Staff appeared by counsel. Petitions for Leave to Intervene filed by AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc. (“AT&T”) and MCI, Inc. (“MCI”) were granted. Staff stated that it had not yet filed a Verified Statement in this docket. On June 14, Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. The Parties filed replies (AT&T and XXX filed a joint reply to Staff’s Verified Statement and joint Exceptions to the Proposed Order; they are identified herein as AT&T/MCI). This matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in ChicagoSpringfield, IllinoisIllinois on July 6, on June 25, 20042005. SBC Illinois, Sage, AT&T, MCI, and Staff appeared. Xx. Xxxxxxxxx testified Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of McNabb, US Cellular, and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunication’s Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, which was admitted into evidence, and Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”” No petitions to intervene were received. Nor are there any contested issues in this proceeding.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On May 616, 20042008, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC AT&T Illinois”) and Sage TelecomVertex Broadband, Inc. Corp. d/b/a AthenaTel d/b/a Reason to Switch d/b/a TownLink Communications d/b/a INT Connections (“SageVertex”), (collectively “Joint Petitioners”) filed a joint petition for approval of the First 1st Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated April 30May 6, 2004, 2008 under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 252 et seq.) (“the Act”). The 1st Amendment to the Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of SBC AT&T Illinois and by Xxxxxx X. XxXxxxxxxx Xxxxx on behalf of XxxxVertex, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, a Status session was held in this matter on June 7, 2004. SBC Illinois, Sage, and Commission Staff appeared by counsel. Petitions for Leave to Intervene filed by AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc. (“AT&T”) and MCI, Inc. (“MCI”) were granted. Staff stated that it had not yet filed a Verified Statement in this docket. On June 14, Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. The Parties filed replies (AT&T and XXX filed a joint reply to Staff’s Verified Statement and joint Exceptions to the Proposed Order; they are identified herein as AT&T/MCI). This matter came on for hearing before a by the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on June 259, 20042008. SBC Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on June 6, 2008. At the hearing on June 9, 2008, AT&T Illinois, Sage, AT&T, MCI, Vertex and Staff appearedappeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxxxx testified on behalf of the Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement, which Statement was admitted into evidence, evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On May 6December 9, 20042013, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Illinois d/b/a AT&T Wholesale (“SBC AT&T Illinois”) and Sage Telecomtw telecom of Illinois, Inc. llc (“Sagetw telecom”), (collectively “Joint Petitioners”) filed a joint petition for approval of the First 2nd Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated April 30November 22, 2004, 2013 under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 252 et seq.) (“the Act”). The 2nd Amendment to the Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of SBC AT&T Illinois and by Xxxxxx X. XxXxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of Xxxxtw telecom of Illinois, IIc, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, a Status session was held in this matter on June 7, 2004. SBC Illinois, Sage, and Commission Staff appeared by counsel. Petitions for Leave to Intervene filed by AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc. (“AT&T”) and MCI, Inc. (“MCI”) were granted. Staff stated that it had not yet filed a Verified Statement in this docket. On June 14, Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. The Parties filed replies (AT&T and XXX filed a joint reply to Staff’s Verified Statement and joint Exceptions to the Proposed Order; they are identified herein as AT&T/MCI). This matter came on for hearing before a by the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on June 25February 19, 20042014. SBC IllinoisStaff previously filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on February 19, Sage2014. At the hearing, AT&T, MCI, tw telecom did not appear on the record. AT&T Illinois and Staff appearedappeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxxxx testified on behalf of the Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement, which Statement was admitted into evidence, evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”