Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On July 13, 2001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and RCN Telecom Services of Illinois, Inc. (“RCN”), filed a joint petition for approval of the First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated May 18, 2001 (the “Agreement”), under Sections 252(a)(1) and 252 (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151, et seq.) (“the Act). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxx, on behalf of RCN, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on August 15, 2001. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on August 15, Staff and Ameritech appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On July 13January 8, 20012009, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and RCN Telecom Services of IllinoisIllinois Bell Telephone Company and Everycall Communications, Inc. d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA (“RCNEverycall”), filed a joint petition for approval of the First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated May 18December 31, 2001 (the “Agreement”)2008, under Sections 252(a)(1) and Section 252 (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151, §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx XxxxxxXxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxx, Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of RCNEverycall, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on August 15February 10, 20012008. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on August 15February 10, Illinois Bell and Staff and Ameritech appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On July 13October 20, 20012005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and RCN Telecom Services of Illinois, Inc. Megacomm Corporation d/b/a MegaPage (“RCNMegacomm”), filed a joint petition for approval of the First Amendment to the a Paging Interconnection Agreement dated May 18September 27, 2001 (the “Agreement”)2005, under Sections 252(a)(1) and Section 252 (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151, §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxx, Xxxxxxx on behalf of RCNMegacomm, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on August 15November 17, 20012005. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on August 15November 17, Illinois Bell and Staff and Ameritech appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On July 13, 2001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and RCN Telecom Services of Illinois, Inc. (“RCN”), filed a joint petition for approval of the First Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated May 18, 2001 (the “Agreement”), under Sections 252(a)(1) and 252 (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151, et seq.) (“the Act). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxx, on behalf of RCN, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on August 15, 2001. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on August 15, Staff and Ameritech appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On July 13May 5, 20012009, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech AT&T Illinois”) and RCN Telecom Services Globalcom Inc. d/b/a First Communications of Illinois, Inc. Ohio (“RCNGlobalcom”), filed a joint petition for approval of the First 8th Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated May 18April 29, 2001 (the “Agreement”)2009, under Sections 252(a)(1) and pursuant to Section 252 (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151, § 252 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment to the Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx XxxxxxXxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, AT&T Illinois and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of RCNGlobalcom, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on August 15June 10, 20012009. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications DivisionDivision on May 15, 2009. At the hearing on August 15June 10, 2009, Globalcom did not appear. AT&T Illinois and Staff and Ameritech appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”