Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On November 1, 2002, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and Focal Communications Corporation of Illinois (“Focal”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Third Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated October 17, 2002 (the “Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxxxx Xxxxx, on behalf of Xxxxx, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 4, 2002. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on December 4, Ameritech, Focal, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On November 1April 25, 20022003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech SBC Illinois”) and Focal Communications Corporation AccuTel of Illinois Texas, Inc. d/b/a 1-800-4-A- PHONE (“FocalAccuTel”), filed a joint petition Joint Petition for approval of the Third First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated October 17April 11, 2002 2003 (the “Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxx, Xxx Xxxxxx on behalf of XxxxxAccuTel, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 4June 3, 20022003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on December 4June 3, Ameritech, Focal, SBC and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On November 1February 13, 20022013, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Illinois d/b/a AT&T Wholesale (“Ameritech IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and Focal Communications Corporation of Illinois 365 Wireless, LLC (“Focal365”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Third Amendment to the Wireless Interconnection Agreement dated October 17January 31, 2002 (the “Amendment”)2013, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx on behalf of Xxxxx365, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 4March 13, 20022013. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on December 4March 13, Ameritech, Focal, Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On November 1July 13, 20022001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and Focal Communications Corporation RCN Telecom Services of Illinois Illinois, Inc. (“FocalRCN”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Third First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated October 17May 18, 2002 2001 (the “AmendmentAgreement”), under Section Sections 252(a)(1) and 252 (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 151, et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxxxx XxxxxXxxxxx X. Xxxx, on behalf of XxxxxRCN, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 4August 15, 20022001. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on December 4August 15, Ameritech, Focal, Staff and Staff Ameritech appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On November 1July 13, 20022001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and Focal Communications Corporation RCN Telecom Services of Illinois Illinois, Inc. (“FocalRCN”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Third Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated October 17May 18, 2002 2001 (the “AmendmentAgreement”), under Section Sections 252(a)(1) and 252 (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 151, et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxxxx XxxxxXxxxxx X. Xxxx, on behalf of XxxxxRCN, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 4August 15, 20022001. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on December 4August 15, Ameritech, Focal, Staff and Staff Ameritech appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On November 1December 29, 20022004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech SBC Illinois”) and Focal Communications Corporation of Illinois Norlight Telecommunications, Inc. (“FocalNorlight”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Third Amendment to the a negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated October 17December 22, 2002 2004 (the “AmendmentAgreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx XxxxxxXxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of SBC Illinois, and by Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxxxx Xxxxx, on behalf of XxxxxNorlight, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct are, to the best of their knowledge, information, information and belief, true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on December 4January 25, 20022005. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which recommended the approval of the Amendment. At the hearing on December 4hearing, Ameritech, Focal, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement Statement, i.e., Staff Ex. 1, was admitted into evidence evidence, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”