Procedure for Considering Alternate Licensing Terms Sample Clauses

Procedure for Considering Alternate Licensing Terms. 928 After having made every effort to resolve the conflict through options 1, 2, and 3 under 6.5.5.1, 929 the PAG, by consensus, may propose that specifically identified patented technology be included 930 in the Proposed Standard Specification even though such claims are not available according to the 931 RF Licensing Requirements of this policy ("PAG Proposal"). The PAG Proposal must explain: 932 • why the chartered goals of the Technical Working Group cannot be met without inclusion 933 of the identified technology; 934 • how the proposed licensing terms will be consistent with widespread adoption. 935 The PAG Proposal must include: 936 • a complete list of claims and licensing terms of the proposed alternative arrangements; 937 and, 938 • a proposed charter for the Technical Working Group, unless the Proposed Standard 939 Specification has been issued and no new work is required. 940 • In order to expedite the process, the PAG Proposal should consider whether additional 941 claims would be excluded under the new charter and include such information in the 942 PAG Proposal. 943 If the Executive Council determines that the PAG Proposal is the best alternative consistent with 944 the FIDO Alliance mission and is clearly justified despite the expressed preference of the FIDO 945 Alliance Membership for RF licensing, then the PAG Proposal shall be circulated Board review. 946 The Executive Council may also circulate the PAG Proposal for Board review without such 947 endorsement. Should the PAG Proposal be rejected by the Board, then either sub-paragraph 4 or 5 948 of Section 6.5.5.1 will apply as appropriate, without further action of the Board. Members of the 949 Technical Working Group who are bound to RF terms are not released from their obligations by 950 virtue of the PAG Proposal alone.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Procedure for Considering Alternate Licensing Terms. 6.5.5.3 代替的なライセンス供与条件の検討手続 After having made every effort to resolve the conflict through options 1, 2, and 3 under 6.5.5.1, the PAG, by consensus, may propose that specifically identified patented technology be included in the Proposed Standard Specification even though such claims are not available according to the RF Licensing Requirements of this policy ("PAG Proposal"). The PAG Proposal must explain:
Sample 1

Related to Procedure for Considering Alternate Licensing Terms

  • Exclusive Procedure The grievance procedure set out above shall be exclusive and shall replace any other grievance procedure for adjustment of any disputes arising from the application and interpretation of this Agreement.

  • Vendor’s Specific Warranties, Terms, and License Agreements Because TIPS serves public entities and non-profits throughout the nation all of which are subject to specific laws and policies of their jurisdiction, as a matter of standard practice, TIPS does not typically accept a Vendor’s specific “Sale Terms” (warranties, license agreements, master agreements, terms and conditions, etc.) on behalf of all TIPS Members. TIPS may permit Vendor to attach those to this Agreement to display to interested customers what terms may apply to their Supplemental Agreement with Vendor (if submitted by Vendor for that purpose). However, unless this term of the Agreement is negotiated and modified to state otherwise, those specific Sale Terms are not accepted by TIPS on behalf of all TIPS Members and each Member may choose whether to accept, negotiate, or reject those specific Sale Terms, which must be reflected in a separate agreement between Vendor and the Member in order to be effective.

  • Annual Notification of Rights If the LEA has a policy of disclosing Education Records and/or Student Data under FERPA (34 CFR § 99.31(a)(1)), LEA shall include a specification of criteria for determining who constitutes a school official and what constitutes a legitimate educational interest in its annual notification of rights.

  • Deadlines for Providing Insurance Documents after Renewal or Upon Request As set forth herein, certain insurance documents must be provided to the OGS Procurement Services contact identified in the Contract Award Notice after renewal or upon request. This requirement means that the Contractor shall provide the applicable insurance document to OGS as soon as possible but in no event later than the following time periods:  For certificates of insurance: 5 business days  For information on self-insurance or self-retention programs: 15 calendar days  For other requested documentation evidencing coverage: 15 calendar days  For additional insured and waiver of subrogation endorsements: 30 calendar days Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Contractor shall have promptly requested the insurance documents from its broker or insurer and shall have thereafter diligently taken all steps necessary to obtain such documents from its insurer and submit them to OGS, OGS shall extend the time period for a reasonable period under the circumstances, but in no event shall the extension exceed 30 calendar days.

  • Required Confidentiality Claim Form This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS provides the required TIPS Confidentiality Claim Form in the "Attachments" section of this solicitation. Vendor must execute this form by either signing and waiving any confidentiality claim, or designating portions of Vendor's proposal confidential. If Vendor considers any portion of Vendor's proposal to be confidential and not subject to public disclosure pursuant to Chapter 552 Texas Gov’t Code or other law(s) and orders, Vendor must have identified the claimed confidential materials through proper execution of the Confidentiality Claim Form. If TIPS receives a public information act or similar request, any responsive documentation not deemed confidential by you in this manner will be automatically released. For Vendor documents deemed confidential by you in this manner, TIPS will follow procedures of controlling statute(s) regarding any claim of confidentiality and shall not be liable for any release of information required by law, including Attorney General determination and opinion. Notwithstanding any other Vendor designation of Vendor's proposal as confidential or proprietary, Vendor’s submission of this proposal constitutes Vendor’s agreement that proper execution of the required TIPS Confidentiality Claim Form is the only way to assert any portion of Vendor's proposal as confidential.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.