Process Model of Peer Production Sample Clauses

Process Model of Peer Production. The general perception of the QMPP process model is that appears as a complete process whose steps give an adequate comprehensiveness; it seems to be appropriated for different target audience, not only teachers and researchers (with pedagogical skills) but could also be implemented for students or other users. Even though almost all experts stated that the model show a good comprehensibility there’s a concern about users who are not deeply involved in formal e-learning contexts, they, in fact, could need a more guided and argumentative approach to really understand the process and optimize all the steps. The entire process seems to be planned to work perfectly in a Connected Learning Community, shows a good usability, but somehow conditioned by the presence of a social networking platform to create a community environment, templates and wizards to drive authoring users, workflows describing the process model. Being the peer production practices underlined in the project (Wikipedia, Facebook, etc) mostly informal, spontaneous and etero-directed it would be good to have guidelines to inform users about the usefulness to set a redefinition of the production process otherwise the model could be perceived as a distracting element rather than a fruitful one. The formalization of the process in the way it’s presented could inhibit users, demotivate and disorient them, besides some steps are not clearly definite and may create misunderstandings like the difference between the steps “enriching” and “updating”. It’s also recommended to clarify that within those steps a validating step is needed.