Projected PMPM Cost Sample Clauses

Projected PMPM Cost. The PMPM costs for each MEG used to calculate the annual budget neutrality expenditure limit for this demonstration are specified below. The PMPM estimates for SSI MEG and TANF MEG are applied to the member months reported based on the standards in place as of June 2013. The PMPM estimates for SSI MEG and TANF MEG are applied to the member months reported for MMA enrollees, discussed in paragraph 95(c). Demonstration Year SSI MEG Trend Rate TANF MEG Trend Rate SSI MEG MMA TANF MEG MMA DY 1 (SFY 2007) $ 948.79 8.0% $199.48 8.0% DY 2 (SFY 2008) $1,024.69 8.0% $215.44 8.0% DY 3 (SFY 2009) $1,106.67 8.0% $232.68 8.0% DY 4 (SFY 2010) $1,195.20 8.0% $251.29 8.0% DY 5 (SFY 2011) $1,290.82 8.0% $271.39 8.0% DY 6 (SFY 2012) $1,356.65 5.1% $285.77 5.3% DY 7 (SFY 2013) $1,425.84 5.1% $300.92 5.3% DY 8 (SFY 2014) $1,498.56 5.1% $316.87 5.3% $294.01 $583.64 107. How the Limit will be Applied. The limits as defined in paragraphs 103 through 106 will apply to the actual expenditures for the demonstration, as reported by the state under Section XVIII. If at the end of the demonstration period the budget neutrality provision has been exceeded, the excess federal funds will be returned to CMS. There will be no new limit placed on the FFP that the state can claim for expenditures for recipients and program categories not listed.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Projected PMPM Cost. The PMPM costs for each MEG used to calculate the annual budget neutrality expenditure limit for this Demonstration are specified below. Demonstration Year SSI MEG Trend Rate TANF MEG Trend Rate DY 1 (SFY 2006-2007) $ 948.79 8.0% $ 199.48 8.0% DY 2 (SFY 2007-2008) $ 1,024.69 8.0% $ 215.44 8.0% DY 3 (SFY 2008-2009) $ 1,106.67 8.0% $ 232.68 8.0% DY 4 (SFY 2009-2010) $ 1,195.20 8.0% $ 251.29 8.0% DY 5 (SFY 2010-2011) $ 1,290.82 8.0% $ 271.39 8.0% DY 6 (SFY 2011-2012) $ 1,356.65 5.1% $ 285.77 5.3% DY 7 (SFY 2012-2013) $ 1,425.84 5.1% $ 300.92 5.3% DY 8 (SFY 2013-2014) $1,498.56 5.1% $316.87 5.3%

Related to Projected PMPM Cost

  • Project Cost a. The estimated cost of the Project is $ 97,740.00. This amount is based upon the Schedule of Financial Assistance in Exhibit "B", attached to and incorporated in this Agreement. Exhibit “B” may be modified by mutual execution of an amendment as provided for in paragraph 5.i.

  • CAISO Monthly Billed Fuel Cost [for Geysers Main only] The CAISO Monthly Billed Fuel Cost is given by Equation C2-1. CAISO Monthly Billed Fuel Cost Equation C2-1 = Billable MWh ◆ Steam Price ($/MWh) Where: • Steam Price is $16.34/MWh. • For purposes of Equation C2-1, Billable MWh is all Billable MWh Delivered after cumulative Hourly Metered Total Net Generation during the Contract Year from all Units exceeds the Minimum Annual Generation given by Equation C2-2. Equation C2-2 Minimum Annual Generation = (Annual Average Field Capacity ◆ 8760 hours ◆ 0.4) - (A+B+C) Where: • Annual Average Field Capacity is the arithmetic average of the two Field Capacities in MW for each Contract Year, determined as described below. Field Capacity shall be determined for each six-month period from July 1 through December 31 of the preceding calendar year and January 1 through June 30 of the Contract Year. Field Capacity shall be the average of the five highest amounts of net generation (in MWh) simultaneously achieved by all Units during eight-hour periods within the six-month period. The capacity simultaneously achieved by all Units during each eight-hour period shall be the sum of Hourly Metered Total Net Generation for all Units during such eight-hour period, divided by eight hours. Such eight-hour periods shall not overlap or be counted more than once but may be consecutive. Within 30 days after the end of each six-month period, Owner shall provide CAISO and the Responsible Utility with its determination of Field Capacity, including all information necessary to validate that determination. • A is the amount of Energy that cannot be produced (as defined below) due to the curtailment of a Unit during a test of the Facility, a Unit or the steam field agreed to by CAISO and Owner. • B is the amount of Energy that cannot be produced (as defined below) due to the retirement of a Unit or due to a Unit’s Availability remaining at zero after a period of ten Months during which the Unit’s Availability has been zero. • C is the amount of Energy that cannot be produced (as defined below) because a Force Majeure Event reduces a Unit’s Availability to zero for at least thirty (30) days or because a Force Majeure Event reduces a Unit’s Availability for at least one hundred eighty (180) days to a level below the Unit Availability Limit immediately prior to the Force Majeure Event. • The amount of Energy that cannot be produced is the sum, for each Settlement Period during which the condition applicable to A, B or C above exists, of the difference between the Unit Availability Limit immediately prior to the condition and the Unit Availability Limit during the condition.

  • Total Project Cost The total cost of the Project is $36,378,683, of which (i) a match is being contributed in the amount of $21,000,000 shall be Matching Funds, and (ii) $15,378,683 shall be provided by the Grant. The total estimated cost of the Project is based upon the Budget. To the extent that the actual cost of the Project exceeds $36,378,683, Grantee shall be solely responsible for such excess. Grantee shall monitor the Budget and submit an amended Budget to Triumph in the event that (a) the total cost of the Project increases or decreases by greater than five percent (5%), (b) total the Budget increases or decreases by greater than five percent (5%), (c) the Budget increases or decreases by greater than five percent (5%) within a particular Budget category, and/or (d) Grantee’s portion of the Matching funds decreases by greater than five percent (5%). If Grantee proposes an increase or decrease by greater than five percent (5%) as described above as compared to the most recently approved Budget, such proposal shall be submitted to Triumph in writing along with a proposed amended Budget, and Triumph shall have the right to approve or disapprove both the proposed Budget category increase or decrease and the proposed amended Budget. If Grantee fails to obtain Triumph's approval, that failure shall be sufficient cause for nonpayment by Triumph as provided in Section 4.2(f). Using the Grant, its own funds, and funds from other sources (including, but not limited to, the Matching Funds), Grantee agrees to bear the entire cost and expense of the Project, including but not limited to, all costs and all expenses in excess of the total estimated cost of the Project, it being expressly understood and agreed that the Grant shall operate only to pay, on and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, a portion of the costs and expenses of the Project. Furthermore, Grantee agrees to spend all of the Matching Funds as contemplated in the Budget, and agrees that its failure to do so shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement.

  • Preliminary Cost Estimates The Engineer shall develop a preliminary cost estimate using the Average Low Bid Unit Price. The Engineer shall estimate the total project cost including preliminary engineering, final engineering, right-of-way (ROW) acquisition, environmental compliance and mitigation, construction, utility relocation, and construction engineering inspection (CEI).

  • Preliminary Cost Estimate Consulting Engineer/Architect shall furnish City an estimate of probable Construction Cost based on the preliminary design. Consulting Engineer/Architect's estimate of probable Construction Cost is to be made on the basis of Consulting Engineer/Architect's experience and qualifications and represent Consulting Engineer/Architect's best judgment as an experienced and qualified design professional, familiar with the construction industry.

  • Project Cost Overruns In the event that the Recipient determines that the moneys granted pursuant to Section II hereof, together with the Local Subdivision Contribution, are insufficient to pay in full the costs of the Project, the Recipient may make a request for supplemental assistance to its District Committee. The Recipient must demonstrate that such funding is necessary for the completion of the Project and the cost overrun was the result of circumstances beyond the Recipient's control, that it could not have been avoided with the exercise of due care, and that such circumstances could not have been anticipated at the time of the Recipient's initial application. Should the District Committee approve such request the action shall be recorded in the District Committee's official meeting minutes and provided to the OPWC Director for the execution of an amendment to this Agreement.

  • Estimated Cost Estimated costs by construction phases for Specified Roads listed in A7 are stated by segments in the Schedule of Items. Such estimated costs are subject to adjustment under B3.3, B5.2, B5.21, B5.212, B5.25, and B5.26. Appropriately adjusted costs shall be made a part of a revised Schedule of Items and shown as adjustments to Timber Sale Account. The revised Schedule of Items shall supersede any prior Schedule of Items when it is dated and signed by Contracting Officer and a copy is furnished to Purchaser.

  • Indirect Cost Except as otherwise authorized by this contract, no indirect costs shall be reimbursed.

  • Project Costs Simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the Company shall disclose to the Department all of the Project Costs which the Company seeks to include for purposes of determining the limitation of the amount of the Credit pursuant to Section 5-30 of the Act and provide to the Department a Schedule of Project Costs in the form as attached hereto as Exhibit C.

  • Cost Estimate An estimate of the total project cost including but not limited to direct expenses, indirect expenses, land cost, and capital expenses.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.