QoS Controls Sample Clauses

QoS Controls. The fourth research area encompasses the mapping of the Service Level Specification (the technical parameters such as a delay bound, a guaranteed throughput, etc.) described in an SLA to QoS controls, mechanisms or components (such as schedulers, queues, policers, etc.) needed in providing the specification defined in such SLA. An example of such QoS mapping is found in [62]. The paper proposes a hierarchical multilayer QoS routing system with dynamic SLA management for large-scale IP networks, by augmenting the existing OSPF and CR-LDP protocols to support hierarchical QoS routing, QoS aggregation, and QoS reservation in a MPLS-DiffServ based hierarchical routing network. A policy server is also proposed that is capable of dynamically handling SLAs between the networks and providing load balancing management within the network. The proposed hierarchical QoS routing reduces the MPLS LSP blocking probability and significantly reduces the control overhead. Another example could be found in [65,66]. The papers present a framework for dynamic management of SLAs in MPLS networks. In the proposed framework, the ingress router of the MPLS backbone performs admission control as well as path selection. For path computation different advanced routing algorithms are used. In the paper, the MPLS SLA is mapped to finding an MPLS LSP that can support the SLA by finding an appropriate path for the LSP. Three routing algorithms were inspected, Lowest-Cost (LC) routing algorithm, Widest Bandwidth (WB) routing algorithm and Minimum Interference Routing Algorithm (MIRA), where performance was judged based on average end-to-end delay, average throughput, average packet dropping probability, average link load and number of utilized links. The paper found through simulations that although LC and WB perform well when the number of requests is small, the MIRA algorithm proves to show more stable values and better performance of these parameters at high network loads. MIRA results in smaller average end-to-end delay and smaller average number of dropped packets whereas still utilizing a smaller number of links in the network. Finally, [38] discusses a QoS mapping at the application level to label packets relatively to each other. The paper proposes a framework for QoS mapping between practically categorized packet video and relative DiffServ network employing unified priority index and adaptive packet forwarding mechanism. In this framework, for example, a video application at the...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to QoS Controls

  • Access Controls a. Authorized Access - DST shall have controls that are designed to maintain the logical separation such that access to systems hosting Fund Data and/or being used to provide services to Fund will uniquely identify each individual requiring access, grant access only to authorized personnel based on the principle of least privileges, and prevent unauthorized access to Fund Data.

  • Audit Controls P. Contractor agrees to an annual system security review by the County to assure that systems processing and/or storing Medi-Cal PII are secure. This includes audits and keeping records for a period of at least three (3) years. A routine procedure for system review to catch unauthorized access to Medi-Cal PII shall be established by the Contractor.

  • Accounting Controls The Company and its Subsidiaries maintain systems of “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined under Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act Regulations) that comply with the requirements of the Exchange Act and have been designed by, or under the supervision of, their respective principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, including, but not limited to, internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations; (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability; (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, the Company is not aware of any material weaknesses in its internal controls. The Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company have been advised of: (i) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are known to the Company’s management and that have adversely affected or are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’ ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (ii) any fraud known to the Company’s management, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

  • Agreement Controls In the event that any term of any of the Loan Documents other than this Agreement conflicts with any express term of this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control to the extent of such conflict.

  • Personnel Controls The County Department/Agency agrees to advise County Workers who have access to Pll, of the confidentiality of the information, the safeguards required to protect the information, and the civil and criminal sanctions for non- compliance contained in applicable federal and state laws. For that purpose, the County Department/Agency shall implement the following personnel controls:

  • Internal Controls The Company shall maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary in order to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and to maintain accountability for assets; (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences.

  • Expansive Controls Where the capability exists, originating or terminating traffic reroutes may be implemented by either Party to temporarily relieve network congestion due to facility failures or abnormal calling patterns. Reroutes will not be used to circumvent normal trunk servicing. Expansive controls will only be used when mutually agreed to by the Parties.

  • Controls Each party will maintain commercially reasonable administrative, technical, and physical controls designed to protect data in its possession or under its control from unauthorised access, accidental loss and unauthorised modification. You are responsible for implementing administrative, technical, and physical controls that are appropriate for your business.

  • Security Controls Annually, upon Fund’s reasonable request, Transfer Agent shall provide Fund’s Chief Information Security Officer or his or her designee with a copy of its corporate information security controls that form the basis for Transfer Agent’s Security Policy and an opportunity to discuss Transfer Agent’s information security measures, and a high level summary of any vulnerability testing conducted by Transfer Agent on its information security controls, with a qualified member of Transfer Agent’s information technology management team. Transfer Agent shall review its Security Policy annually.

  • Technical Security Controls 35 a. Workstation/Laptop encryption. All workstations and laptops that store PHI COUNTY 36 discloses to CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of 37 COUNTY either directly or temporarily must be encrypted using a FIPS 140-2 certified algorithm which 1 is 128bit or higher, such as AES. The encryption solution must be full disk unless approved by the 2 COUNTY.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.