Quality of Care Review Program Sample Clauses

Quality of Care Review Program. The Compliance Committee shall ensure that, within 120 days after the Effective Date, Extendicare establishes and implements a program for performing internal quality audits and reviews (hereinafter “Quality of Care Review Program”). The Quality of Care Review Program shall be designed to determine: i. whether the residents at Extendicare are receiving the quality of care and quality of life consistent with professionally recognized standards of care, 42 C.F.R. Part 483, and any other applicable federal and state statutes, regulations, and directives; ii. whether Extendicare is effectively reviewing quality of care related incidents and completing root cause analyses; iii. whether Extendicare’s action plans in response to identified quality of care problems are appropriate, timely, implemented, and enforced; and iv. whether Extendicare’s nursing staff is of the quantity, quality, and composition necessary to consistently meet resident care needs.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quality of Care Review Program. The Compliance Committee shall ensure that, within 120 days after the Effective Date, UHS has a program for performing internal quality audits and reviews (hereinafter “Quality of Care Review Program”) that complies with the following requirements: i. make findings as to whether the patients at the Behavioral Health Facilities are receiving the quality of care and quality of life consistent with professionally recognized standards of care and applicable federal and state statutes, regulations, and directives; ii. review quality of care related incidents and analyze root causes for those incidents; and iii. develop corrective action plans in response to identified quality of care problems and track the implementation and effectiveness of those plans.
Quality of Care Review Program. The Compliance Committee shall ensure that, within 180 days after the Effective Date, Xxxxxxx Lutheran establishes and implements a program for performing internal quality audits and reviews (hereinafter Xxxxxxx Lutheran Corporate Integrity Agreement “Quality of Care Review Program”). The Quality of Care Review Program shall make findings as to: a. whether the residents are receiving the quality of care and quality of life consistent with professionally recognized standards of care, 42 C.F.R. Part 483, and any other applicable federal and state statutes, regulations, and directives; b. whether Xxxxxxx Lutheran is effectively reviewing quality of care related incidents and completing root cause analyses; and c. whether Xxxxxxx Lutheran’s action plans in response to identified quality of care problems are appropriate, timely, implemented, and enforced.
Quality of Care Review Program. The Compliance Committee shall ensure that, within 120 days after the Effective Date, Spring Gate establishes and implements a program for performing internal quality audits and reviews (hereinafter “Quality of Care Review Program”). The Quality of Care Review Program shall make findings as to:‌ i. whether the residents at Spring Gate are receiving the quality of care and quality of life consistent with professionally recognized standards of care, 42 C.F.R. Part 483, and any other applicable federal and state statutes, regulations, and directives; ii. whether Spring Gate is effectively reviewing quality of care related incidents and completing root cause analyses; and iii. whether Spring Gate’s action plans in response to identified quality of care problems are appropriate, timely, implemented, and managed.
Quality of Care Review Program. The Compliance Committee shall ensure that, within 120 days after the Effective Date, Vanguard establishes and implements a program for performing internal quality audits and reviews (hereinafter “Quality of Care Review Program”). The Quality of Care Review Program shall make findings as to: i. whether the residents at Vanguard are receiving the quality of care and quality of life consistent with professionally recognized standards of care, 42 C.F.R. Part 483, and any other applicable federal and state statutes, regulations, and directives; ii. whether Vanguard is effectively reviewing quality of care related incidents and completing root cause analyses; and iii. whether Vanguard's action plans in response to identified quality of care problems are appropriate, timely, implemented, and reviewed for effectiveness.
Quality of Care Review Program. The Compliance Committee shall ensure that, within 120 days after the Effective Date, GGNSC establishes and implements a program for performing internal quality audits and reviews, (hereinafter “Quality of Care Review Program”). i. The Quality of Care Review Program shall utilize MDS Quality Indicator and Quality Measure (QI/QM) data to generate reports, including: (a) Facility reports, showing the facility-level QI/QM values and information on the MDS assessments underlying these values; (b) Facility Comparison Reports: a summary table that includes QI/QM values for each facility covered by the CIA, permitting comparison of QI/QM values among facilities; (c) District Comparison Reports: a summary report comparing District 63’s QI/QM values to other Districts’ QI/QM values; and (d) Resident Reports: a resident-level report showing which QI/QM values were triggered by each resident in the District 63 Facility Report. ii. Utilizing the internal quality audits and reviews, the QI/QM reports, and analysis of survey data, the Quality of Care Review Program shall make findings as to: (a) whether the residents in District 63 are receiving the quality of care and quality of life consistent with professionally recognized standards of care, 42 C.F.R. Part 483, and any other applicable federal and state statutes, regulations, and directives; (b) whether GGNSC is effectively reviewing quality of care related incidents and completing root cause analyses within District 63; and (c) whether GGNSC’s action plans in response to identified quality of care problems within District 63 are appropriate, timely, implemented, and enforced.
Quality of Care Review Program. The Compliance Committee shall ensure that, within 120 days after the Effective Date, SavaSeniorCare Administrative and Consulting, LLC establishes and implements a program for performing internal quality audits and reviews (hereinafter “Quality of Care Review Program”). The Quality of Care Review Program shall:‌ i. assess whether the residents at Sava Facilities are receiving the quality of care and quality of life consistent with professionally recognized standards of care, 42 C.F.R. Part 483, and any other applicable federal and state statutes, regulations, and directives; ii. review quality of care related incidents and complete root cause analyses; and iii. develop corrective action plans in response to identified quality of care problems and track the implemention and effectiveness of those plans.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Quality of Care Review Program

  • QUALITY OF CARE (a) The PHP shall assure that any and all eligible beneficiaries receive partial hospitalization services which comply with standards in Article 3.3

  • Quality of Services (a) The Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications, and other services furnished pursuant to this Agreement. (b) To that end, the Consultant shall correct or shall revise, without additional compensation, any errors or omissions in its work product or shall make such revisions as are necessary as the result of the failure of the Consultant to provide an accurate, more efficient, and properly constructable product in its designs, drawings, specifications, or other services. (c) The County's review/approval/acceptance of or payment for the services required by this Agreement shall NOT be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this Agreement. Additionally, the Consultant shall be and remain liable to the County in accordance with applicable law for all damages to the County caused by the Consultant's negligent performance of any of the services furnished under this Agreement. (d) The rights and remedies of the County provided for under this Agreement are in addition to any other rights and remedies otherwise provided by law.

  • Quality of Work Consultant agrees that all Services performed under this Agreement will conform to the specifications of the College, be free from errors and be of professional quality according to applicable industry standards. Upon notice by the College, Consultant will promptly correct any defects without charge to the College.

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.

  • Quality of Service Contractor shall perform its services with care, skill, and diligence, in accordance with the applicable professional standards currently recognized by such profession, and shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, and coordination of all reports, designs, drawings, plans, information, specifications, and/or other items and services furnished under this Agreement. Contractor shall, without additional compensation, correct or revise any errors or deficiencies immediately upon discovery in its reports, drawings, specifications, designs, and/or other related items or services.

  • Program Compliance The School Board shall be responsible for monitoring the program to provide technical assistance and to ensure program compliance.

  • Review Procedures a. In consultation with the Illinois SHPO, NRCS shall identify those undertakings with little to no potential to affect historic properties and list those undertakings in Appendix A. Upon the determination by the CRS that a proposed undertaking is included in Appendix A, the NRCS is not required to consult further with the SHPO for that undertaking. A list of undertakings with the potential to affect historic properties comprises Appendix B. b. The lists of undertakings provided in Appendices A and B may be modified through consultation and written agreement between the NRCS State Conservationist and the SHPO without requiring an amendment to this Illinois Prototype Agreement. The NRCS State Office will maintain the master list and will provide an updated list to all consulting parties with an explanation of the rationale for classifying the practices accordingly. c. Undertakings identified in Appendix B shall require further review as outlined in Stipulation V. a. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO to define the undertaking’s APE, identify and evaluate historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking, assess potential effects, and identify strategies for resolving adverse effects prior to implementing the undertaking. 1) NRCS may provide its proposed APE, identification of historic properties and/or scope of identification efforts, and assessment of effects in a single transmittal to the SHPO, provided this documentation meets the substantive standards in 36 CFR Part 800.4-5 and 800.11. 2) The NRCS shall attempt to avoid adverse effects to historic properties whenever possible; where historic properties are located in the APE, NRCS shall describe how it proposes to modify, buffer, or move the undertaking to avoid adverse effects to historic properties. 3) Where the NRCS proposes a finding of "no historic properties affected" or "no adverse effect" to historic properties, the SHPO shall have 30 calendar days from receipt of this documented description and information to review it and provide comments. The NRCS shall take into account all timely comments. i. If the SHPO, or another consulting party, disagrees with NRCS' findings and/or determination, it shall notify the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar daytime period. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO or other consulting party to attempt to resolve the disagreement. If the disagreement cannot be resolved through this consultation, NRCS shall follow the dispute resolution process in Stipulation VIII below. ii. If the SHPO does not respond to the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar day period and/or the NRCS receives no objections from other consulting parties, or if the SHPO concurs with the NRCS' determination and proposed actions to avoid adverse effects, the NRCS shall document the concurrence/lack of response within the review time noted above and may move forward with the undertaking. 4) Where a proposed undertaking may adversely affect historic properties, NRCS shall describe proposed measures to minimize or mitigate the adverse effects, and follow the process in 36 CFR Part 800.6, including consultation with other consulting patties and notification to the ACHP, to develop a Memorandum of Agreement to resolve the adverse effects. Should the proposed undertaking have the potential to adversely affect a known NHL, the NRCS shall, to the maximum extent possible, undertake such planning and actions that may be necessary to minimize harm to the NHL in accordance with 54 U.S.C. § 306107 of the NHPA and 36 CFR Part 800.6 and 800.10, including consultation with the ACHP and respective National Park Service, Regional National Historic Landmark Program Coordinator, to develop a Memorandum of Agreement. d. NRCS will conduct archaeological surveys and will submit reports and other documentation to SHPO for review and comment. When no archaeological sites have been located by the archaeological survey, NRCS may proceed with the proposed undertaking. Reports for negative surveys must be submitted to SHPO on a quarterly basis. All positive and negative reports submitted to SHPO will be sent digitally for submission to the Inventory of Illinois Archaeological Sites (IAS) data file maintained by staff at the Illinois State Museum (ISM) housed under the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). The NRCS further agrees that access to specific site location data will be restricted to the CRS, the NRCS field personnel installing conservation practices adjacent to the cultural resource, and the landowner. Specific site location information for individual projects will be maintained in a secure cultural resources file kept in the field offices and will not be available to the public. e. Curation: NRCS personnel will not collect artifactual material during routine field inspections. However, if a professional survey, evaluation testing, or mitigation is required, NRCS shall ensure that all materials and records resulting from cultural resources surveys or data recovery activities on federal or state property are curated by the Illinois State Museum. The NRCS shall ensure that all records resulting from cultural resource surveys or data recovery activities on private property are curated by the Illinois State Museum or an equivalent curation facility in accordance with 36 CFR Part 79. Subject to the landowner's permission, all objects resulting from cultural resources surveys or data recovery activities are maintained by the Illinois State Museum or equivalent research institution until their analysis is complete and they are returned to their owner(s). Although landowners will be encouraged to donate artifactual material, it is understood that objects collected on private land remain the property of the landowner(s) unless the landowner(s) donates the material to the Illinois State Museum or equivalent research institution. This excludes burial goods, as stipulated by XXXXXX.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!