Quebec Action Sample Clauses

Quebec Action. Superior Court of Quebec (district of Québec), File No. 200-06- 000145-121 Siskinds Desmeules s.e.n.c.r.l. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Yazaki Corporation, Yazaki North America, Inc., Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd., N.S. International, Ltd., New Sabina Industries, Inc., Calsonic Kansei Corporation, Calsonic Kansei North America, Inc., Continental AG, Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc., Continental Tire All Persons in Quebec who, during the Class Period, (a) purchased, directly or indirectly, Instrument Panel Clusters; and/or (b) purchased or leased, directly or indirectly, a new or used Automotive Vehicle containing Instrument Panel Clusters; and/or (c) purchased for import into Canada, a new or used Automotive Vehicle containing Instrument Panel Clusters. Excluded Persons are excluded from the Quebec Settlement Class. Canada Inc. (formerly known as Continental Automotive Canada, Inc.), Continental Automotive Electronics LLC, Continental Automotive Korea Ltd., Denso Corporation, Denso International America, Inc., Denso Manufacturing Canada, Inc., Denso Sales Canada, Inc. British Columbia Supreme Court File No. S-132961 (Vancouver Registry) Camp Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx LLP Xxxxxx Xxxxx Denso Corporation, Denso International America, Inc., Denso Manufacturing Canada, Inc., Denso Sales Canada, Inc., Yazaki Corporation, Yazaki North America, Inc., Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd., N.S. International, Ltd., New Sabina Industries, Inc., Calsonic Kansei All Persons in British Columbia who, during the Class Period, (a) purchased, directly or indirectly, Instrument Panel Clusters; and/or (b) purchased or leased, directly or indirectly, a new or used Automotive Vehicle containing Instrument Panel Clusters; and/or (c) purchased for import into Canada, a new or used Automotive Vehicle containing Instrument Panel Clusters. Excluded Persons are excluded from the BC Settlement Class. Corporation, Calsonic Kansei North America, Inc., Continental AG, Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc., Faurecia Automotive Holdings SAS, Faurecia USA Holdings Inc., and Xxxxxxx Controls, Inc. British Columbia Supreme Camp Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Continental Automotive Electronics LLC and Continental Automotive Korea Ltd. All Persons in British Columbia who, during the Class Period, (a) purchased, Court File No. LLP directly or indirectly, S-1610470 Instrument Panel Clusters; (Vancouver and/or (b) purchased or Registry) leased, directly or indirectly, a new or used Automotive Vehicle containing In...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quebec Action. Superior Siskinds Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Automotive All Persons in Quebec who, Court of Desmeules Systems, Ltd., Hitachi Automotive during the Class Period, (a) Quebec s.e.n.c.r.l. Systems Americas, Inc., Denso purchased, directly or indirectly, (district of Corporation, Denso International Electronic Throttle Bodies; Québec), File America, Inc., Denso and/or (b) purchased or leased, No. 200-06- Manufacturing Canada, Inc., Denso directly or indirectly, a new or 000199-169 Sales Canada, Inc., Mitsubishi used Automotive Vehicle; and/or Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi (c) purchased for import into Electric Automotive America, Inc., Canada, a new or used Mitsubishi Electric Sales Canada Automotive Vehicle. Excluded Inc., Aisan Industry Co. Ltd., Persons are excluded from the Franklin Precision Industry, Inc., Quebec Settlement Class. Aisan Corporation of America, Mitsuba Corporation and American Mitsuba Corporation. Court File No. CV-14-506649-00CP BETWEEN: Plaintiffs Proceeding under the Class Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxx, 0000, S.O. 1992, c. 6 ON READING the materials filed, including the settlement agreement with the Settling Defendants dated as of , 2019 attached to this Order as Schedule “A” (the “Settlement Agreement”), and on reading the submissions of counsel for the Plaintiffs and Counsel for the Settling Defendants, the Non-Settling Defendants taking no position; AND ON BEING ADVISED that  consents to being appointed as notice provider in accordance with the terms of this Order;
Quebec Action. Superior Autolights Siskinds, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Koito Manufacturing All Persons in Quebec who, Did the Settling June 1,1997 to Court of Desmeules Co., Ltd., North during the Class Period, (a) Defendants, or any April 2, 2019. Quebec s.e.n.c.r.l American Lighting, Inc., purchased, directly or of them, conspire to (district of Ichikoh Industries, Ltd., indirectly, Autolights; and/or fix, raise, maintain, Québec), Xxxxxxx Electric Co., (b) purchased or leased, and/or stabilize the File No. Ltd., Xxxxxxx Electric directly or indirectly, a new prices of Autolights 200-06- U.S. Co., Inc., II Xxxxxxx or used Automotive Vehicle; in Canada and/or 000174- Co., Inc., Mitsuba and/or (c) purchased for elsewhere during the 147 Corporation and import into Canada, a new or Class Period? If so, American Mitsuba used Automotive Vehicle. what damages, if Corporation Excluded Persons are any, did Settlement excluded from the Quebec Class Members Settlement Class. suffer? British Autolights Camp Xxxxxx Xxxxx Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd., North American Lighting, Inc., Ichikoh Industries, Ltd., Xxxxxxx Electric Co., Ltd., Xxxxxxx Electric U.S. Co., Inc., and II Xxxxxxx Co., Inc. All Persons in British Did the Settling June 1,1997 to Columbia Xxxxxxxx Columbia who, during the Defendants, or any April 2, 2019. Supreme Xxxxxxxx Class Period, (a) purchased, of them, conspire to Court File Xxxxxxxx directly or indirectly, fix, raise, maintain, No. S- LLP Autolights; and/or (b) and/or stabilize the 135606 purchased or leased, directly prices of Autolights (Vancouver or indirectly, a new or used in Canada and/or Registry) Automotive Vehicle elsewhere during the containing Autolights; and/or Class Period? If so, Court and File No. Part Plaintiff(s)’ Counsel Plaintiff(s) Defendants Settlement Class Common Issues Class Period (c) purchased for import into what damages, if Canada, a new or used any, did Settlement Automotive Vehicle Class Members containing Autolights. suffer? Excluded Persons are excluded from the BC Settlement Class. Court File No. • THE HONOURABLE ) , THE DAY JUSTICE BELOBABA ) OF , 2021 BETWEEN: Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6 submissions of counsel for the Ontario Plaintiffs and Counsel for the Settling Defendants, the Non- Settling Defendants taking no position;
Quebec Action. Superior Siskinds Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Ltd., Hitachi Automotive All Persons in Quebec who, Court of Desmeules and Xxxx-Xxxx Systems, Ltd., Hitachi Automotive during the Class Period, (a) Quebec s.e.n.c.r.l. Xxxxxx Systems Americas, Inc., Denso purchased, directly or indirectly, (district of Corporation, Denso International Fuel Injection Systems; and/or Québec), File Korea Corporation, Denso Korea (b) purchased or leased, directly No. 200-06- Automotive Corporation, Denso or indirectly, a new or used 000180-144 International America, Inc., Denso Automotive Vehicle; and/or (c) Manufacturing Canada, Inc., Denso purchased for import into Sales Canada, Inc., Mitsubishi Canada, a new or used Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Automotive Vehicle. Excluded Electric Automotive America, Inc., Persons are excluded from the Mitsubishi Electric Sales Canada, Quebec Settlement Class. Inc., Aisan Industry Co. Ltd., Hyundam Industrial Co., Ltd., Franklin Precision Industry, Inc., Aisan Corporation of America, Mitsuba Corporation, American Mitsuba Corporation, Keihin Corporation, Keihin North America, Inc., Maruyasu Industries Co., Ltd., Mikuni Corporation, Mikuni American Corporation, Xxxxxx Xxxxx XxxX, Xxxxxx Xxxxx LLC and Xxxxxx Xxxxx Inc. Court File No. CV-14-506683-00CP BETWEEN: Plaintiffs HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, LTD., HITACHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS AMERICAS, INC., DENSO CORPORATION, DENSO INTERNATIONAL AMERICA INC., DENSO MANUFACTURING CANADA, INC., DENSO SALES CANADA, INC., , DENSO INTERNATIONAL KOREA CORPORATION, DENSO KOREA AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION, MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION, MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC AUTOMOTIVE AMERICA, INC., MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC SALES CANADA INC., MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC US HOLDINGS, INC., AISAN INDUSTRY CO. LTD, FRANKLIN PRECISION INDUSTRY, INC., AISAN CORPORATION OF AMERICA, HYUNDAM INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., KEIHIN CORPORATION, KEIHIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., MARUYASU INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., MIKUNI CORPORATION, MIKUNI AMERICAN CORPORATION, XXXXXX XXXXX XXXX, XXXXXX XXXXX LLC, XXXXXX XXXXX INC., RBKB BOSCH ELECTRICAL DRIVES CO., LTD. MITSUBA CORPORATION and AMERICAN MITSUBA CORPORATION Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6 against Mitsuba Corporation and American Mitsuba Corporation (collectively, the “Settling Defendants”) was read this day at Osgoode Hall, 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx. ON READING the materials filed, including the settlement agreement with the Settling Defendants dated as of ⚫, 2019 attac...
Quebec Action. Superior Siskinds Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd., All Persons in Quebec who, Court of Desmeules North American Lighting, Inc., during the Class Period, (a) Quebec s.e.n.c.r.l. Ichikoh Industries, Ltd., Xxxxxxx purchased, directly or indirectly, (district of Electric Co., Ltd., Xxxxxxx Electric Autolights; and/or (b) purchased Québec), File U.S. Co., Inc., II Xxxxxxx Co., Inc., or leased, directly or indirectly, a No. 200-06- Mitsuba Corporation and American new or used Automotive 000174-147 Mitsuba Corporation Vehicle; and/or (c) purchased for import into Canada, a new or used Automotive Vehicle. Excluded Persons are excluded from the Quebec Settlement Class. Court File No. CV-13-478642-00CP BETWEEN: Plaintiffs Proceeding under the Class Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxx, 0000, S.O. 1992, c. 6 ON READING the materials filed, including the settlement agreement with the Settling Defendants dated as of , 2019 attached to this Order as Schedule “A” (the “Settlement Agreement”), and on reading the submissions of counsel for the Plaintiffs and Counsel for the Settling Defendants, the Non-Settling Defendants taking no position; AND ON BEING ADVISED that  consents to being appointed as notice provider in accordance with the terms of this Order;

Related to Quebec Action

  • COURT ACTION If a judgment of dissolution of marriage is obtained by either Xxxxxx, the original of this Agreement shall be attached to the judgment. The court shall be requested to do the following: a.) Approve the entire Agreement as fair and equitable; b.) Order the Couple to comply with all of its executory provisions; c.) Merge the provisions relating to child custody and visitation, Child Support, Spousal Support, future acts with respect to property division, attorney fees and costs, and income tax, and only those provisions, into the judgment; and d.) Incorporate the remainder of the Agreement in the judgment for the sole purpose of identification.

  • Action Action" means any demand, action, suit, countersuit, arbitration, inquiry, proceeding or investigation by or before any federal, state, local, foreign or international governmental authority or any arbitration or mediation tribunal.

  • Interim Actions In the case of a Material Default that causes continuing damages to the Sellers for which indemnification by the Purchasers pursuant to Article 8 of the Agreement would not be sufficient to remedy all such damages, the Sellers and the Purchasers shall cooperate in good faith to implement appropriate interim actions to mitigate such damages until the Corrective Action Plan is finalized. The parties shall develop and implement such interim actions on timelines that are commensurate with the severity of the harm and that take into account the risks to the Sellers of delay. The Purchasers shall use reasonable best efforts to mitigate the adverse consequences on the Sellers of the Material Default until the Correction Action Plan is finalized.

  • Notice of Action When a supervisor or manager believes it is necessary to impose a minor disciplinary action on an employee, the supervisor shall notify the employee in writing of his/her decision stating the reason for the action, the regulations or rules which have been violated, the specific action to be taken, and the effective date of the action.

  • Settlement of Actions Neither the Manager nor any other Underwriter party to this Master AAU may settle or agree to settle any Action related to or arising out of the Offering, nor may any other Underwriter settle or agree to settle any such Action without the consent of the Manager, nor may any other Underwriter seek the Manager’s consent to any such settlement agreement, nor may the Manager consent to any such settlement agreement, unless: (A) the Manager, together with such other Underwriters as constitute a majority in aggregate interest based on the Underwriting Percentage of the Underwriters as a whole (including the Manager’s interest), approve the settlement of such Action, in which case the Manager is authorized to settle for all Underwriters, provided, however, that the settlement agreement results in the settlement of the Action against all Underwriters raised by the plaintiffs party thereto; or (B) (i) such settlement agreement expressly provides that the non-settling Underwriters will be given a judgment credit (or credit in settlement) with respect to all such Actions for which the non-settling Underwriters may be found liable (or will pay in subsequent settlement), in an amount that is the greatest of: (x) the dollar amount paid in such initial settlement to settle such Actions, (y) the proportionate share of the settling Underwriter’s fault in respect of common damages arising in connection with such Actions as proven at trial, if applicable, or (z) the amount by which the settling Underwriter would have been required to make contribution had it not settled, under Sections 9.5 and 11.2 hereof in respect of the final non-appealable judgment (or settlement) subsequently entered into by the non-settling Underwriters (such greatest amount of either (x), (y), or (z), the “Judgment Credit”);3 (ii) such settlement agreement expressly provides that in the event that the applicable court does not approve the Judgment Credit as part of the settlement, the settlement agreement will automatically terminate; and (iii) the final judgment entered with respect to the settlement agreement contains the Judgment Credit.

  • Regulatory Action (a) If the Executive is removed and/or permanently prohibited from participating in the conduct of the Employer’s affairs by an order issued under Section 8(e)(4) or 8(g)(l) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”) (12 U.S.C. 1818(e)(4) and (g)(l)), all obligations of the Employer under this Agreement shall terminate, as of the effective date of such order, except for the payment of Base Salary due and owing under Section 4.1 on the effective date of said order, and reimbursement under Section 4.6 of expenses incurred as of the effective date of termination. (b) If the Executive is suspended and/or temporarily prohibited from participating in the conduct of the Employer’s affairs by a notice served under Section 8(e)(3) or 8(g)(l) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1818(e)(3) and (g)(l)), all obligations of the Employer under this Agreement shall be suspended as of the date of service, unless stayed by appropriate proceedings. If the charges in the notice are dismissed, the Employer shall (i) pay the Executive all or part of the compensation withheld while its contract obligations were suspended and (ii) reinstate (in whole or in part) any of its obligations which were suspended. (c) If the Employer is in default (as defined in Section 3(x)(l) of the FDIA), all obligations under this Agreement shall terminate as of the date of default, but the vested rights of the parties shall not be affected. (d) All obligations under this Agreement shall be terminated, except to the extent a determination is made that continuation of the contract is necessary for the continued operation of the Employer (i) by the director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) or his or her designee (the “Director”), at the time the FDIC enters into an agreement to provide assistance to or on behalf of the Employer under the authority contained in 13(c) of the FDIA; or (ii) by the Director, at the time the Director approves a supervisory merger to resolve problems related to operation of the Employer when the Employer is determined by the Director to be in an unsafe and unsound condition. Any rights of the Executive that have already vested, however, shall not be affected by such action.

  • Civil Action except where a joint Union-Employer Committee considers that there has been flagrant or wilful negligence on the part of an employee, the Employer agrees not to seek indemnity against an employee whose actions result in a judgement against the Employer. The Employer agrees to pay any judgement against an employee arising out of the performance of his/her duties. The Employer also agrees to pay any legal costs incurred in the proceedings including those of the employee.

  • Legal Action There shall not have been instituted or threatened any legal proceeding relating to, or seeking to prohibit or otherwise challenge the consummation of, the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or to obtain substantial damages with respect thereto.

  • Litigation; Regulatory Action (a) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.9 of the Buyer Disclosure Schedule, no material litigation, claim, suit, investigation or other proceeding before any court, governmental agency or arbitrator is pending against Buyer or any of its Subsidiaries, and, to the Knowledge of Buyer, (i) no litigation, claim, suit, investigation or other proceeding has been threatened and (ii) there are no facts which would reasonably be expected to give rise to such litigation, claim, suit, investigation or other proceeding. Except as publicly disclosed, neither Buyer nor any of its Subsidiaries has been subject to any order or directive by, or been ordered to pay any civil money penalty by, or has been since January 1, 2019, a recipient of any supervisory letter from, or since January 1, 2019, has adopted any board resolutions at the request of, any Governmental Authority that currently regulates in any material respect the conduct of its business or that in any manner relates to its capital adequacy, its ability to pay dividends, its credit or risk management policies, its management or its business, other than those of general application that apply to similarly-situated banks or financial holding companies or their subsidiaries. (b) Neither Buyer nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any of their respective properties is a party to or is subject to any assistance agreement, board resolution, order, decree, supervisory agreement, memorandum of understanding, condition or similar arrangement with, or a commitment letter or similar submission to, any Governmental Authority charged with the supervision or regulation of financial institutions or issuers of securities or engaged in the insurance of deposits or the supervision or regulation of Buyer or any of its Subsidiaries. (c) Neither Buyer nor any of its Subsidiaries, has been advised by a Governmental Authority that it will issue, or has Knowledge of any facts which would reasonably be expected to give rise to the issuance by any Governmental Authority or has Knowledge that such Governmental Authority is contemplating issuing or requesting (or is considering the appropriateness of issuing or requesting) any such order, decree, agreement, board resolution, memorandum of understanding, supervisory letter, commitment letter, condition or similar submission.

  • Authorization of Actions to Be Taken (a) Each Holder of Securities, by its acceptance thereof, consents and agrees to the terms of each Security Document and the Intercreditor Agreements, as originally in effect and as amended, supplemented or replaced from time to time in accordance with its terms or the terms of this Indenture, authorizes and directs the Trustee and the Collateral Agent to enter into the Security Documents to which it is a party, authorizes and empowers the Trustee to direct the Collateral Agent to enter into, and the Collateral Agent to execute and deliver, the Intercreditor Agreements or joinders thereto, and authorizes and empowers the Trustee and the Collateral Agent to bind the Holders of Securities as set forth in the Security Documents to which it is a party and the Intercreditor Agreements and to perform its obligations and exercise its rights and powers thereunder. (b) The Collateral Agent and the Trustee are authorized and empowered to receive for the benefit of the Holders of Securities any funds collected or distributed under the Security Documents to which the Collateral Agent or Trustee is a party and to make further distributions of such funds to the Holders of Securities according to the provisions of this Indenture. (c) Subject to the provisions of Section 7.01, Section 7.02, the Security Documents, and the Intercreditor Agreements, the Trustee may, in its sole discretion and without the consent of the Holders, direct, on behalf of the Holders, the Collateral Agent to take all actions it deems necessary or appropriate in order to: (i) foreclose upon or otherwise enforce any or all of the First Priority Liens; (ii) enforce any of the terms of the Security Documents to which the Collateral Agent or Trustee is a party; or (iii) collect and receive payment of any and all Note Obligations. Subject to the Intercreditor Agreements, the Trustee is authorized and empowered to institute and maintain, or direct the Collateral Agent to institute and maintain, such suits and proceedings as it may deem expedient to protect or enforce the First Priority Liens or the Security Documents to which the Collateral Agent or Trustee is a party or to prevent any impairment of Collateral by any acts that may be unlawful or in violation of the Security Documents to which the Collateral Agent or Trustee is a party or this Indenture, and such suits and proceedings as the Trustee or the Collateral Agent may deem expedient to preserve or protect its interests and the interests of the Holders of Securities in the Collateral, including power to institute and maintain suits or proceedings to restrain the enforcement of or compliance with any legislative or other governmental enactment, rule or order that may be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid if the enforcement of, or compliance with, such enactment, rule or order would impair the security interest hereunder or be prejudicial to the interests of Holders, the Trustee or the Collateral Agent.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!