Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis (Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity Sample Clauses

Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis (Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity. (Table 3). Child- and parent-report scores successfully discriminated the presence/absence of any anxiety disorder for the Total scale (AUC = 0.903, 0.981, respectively, p’s < .001), presence/absence of GAD with the GA subscale (AUC = 0.860, 0.927, p’s < .001), and presence/absence of SAD with the SA subscale (AUC = 0.833, 0.941, p’s < .001). Table 3 describes the sensitivity and specificity based on the SCARED’s clinical cutoff scores for Total score and the GA and SA subscales. While all reports show high specificity (>84%) across informant and scale/subscale, they come at the cost of lower sensitivity (<80%). In line with these findings, PPV ranges from 53.19% to 98.56%, while NPVs and OCCs are consistently high, ranging from 80.30% to 94.40% and 80.72% to 89.64%, respectively.

Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis (Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity for child, parent, and average child-parent report scores (Table 3). Child- and parent-report scores successfully discriminated the presence/absence of any anxiety disorder for the Total scale (AUC = 0.657, 0.924, respectively, p’s < .01), the presence/absence of SAD with the SA subscale (AUC = 0.758, 0.944, p’s < .001). However, only the parent-report (AUC = 0.931, p’s < .001), not the child-report score (AUC = .582, p > .05), successfully discriminated the presence/absence of GAD on the GA subscale. Table 3 describes the sensitivity and specificity based on the SCARED’s clinical cutoff scores for Total score and the GA and SA subscales. While all reports shows high specificity (>76%) across informant and scale/subscale, they come at the cost of lower sensitivity (<71%). In line with these findings, PPV ranges from 3.85% to 92.31 %, while NPVs and OCCs are consistently high, ranging from 91.53 % to 98.34% and 72.21% to 95.44 %, respectively.