Recommendations for program replication Sample Clauses

Recommendations for program replication. The PHOENIX program has proven to be effective at developing community services and infrastructure through providing much needed jobs in poor communities. ▪ Employment programs can be sustainable when designed to build and/or repair vital community infrastructure. The program impact on the local Palestinian economy was very positive because it fulfilled all requirements for a successful job creation projects i.e. high labor input and local material usage, wage rate, accumulated wages hence accumulated positive value to national economy. Furthermore, it fulfilled the immediate community needs for infrastructure upgrades in water, sewage, roads, kindergartens and schools. ▪ The CHF methodology of selecting small scale infrastructure projects and utilizing smaller contracting and supply companies that employ local workers from within the target community is very successful. ▪ The CHF/PHOENIX approach that focuses on ensuring high community contributions (cash or in kind) increases the sense of ownership by the community, encourages other donors’ support and optimizes the outputs and impact of every dollar invested by the donor. ▪ Finally: the strategic approach of working with neighborhood committees, municipalities and community groups guarantees a high degree of ownership on the beneficiaries’ side and a high degree of visibility for CHF as well as for USAID.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Recommendations for program replication. The Emergency Solid Waste Collection, Landfill Rehabilitation and Jobs Creation (SWM) Program was very successful in that it created a substantial amount of employment for a needy sector of the population, and distributed the benefits of this employment widely. In doing so it also contributed to safeguarding public health by significantly reducing the amount a solid waste collecting in the streets of the capital city, and increasing the capacity of local authorities to operate the regional landfill at Truitier. It was, as its name suggests, intended to be an emergency program and did not - with the hopeful exception of the reopening of the landfill – fundamentally alter the extremely serious shortcomings of the solid waste management system in Port au Prince. The program did illustrate that a labor intensive model relying on a combination of community participation, a substantial role for the private sector, and public sector coordination and operation of the landfill is significantly more cost effective and operationally efficient that the current system in place. We are aware and acknowledge that, while opening the applications during the bidding process, we had to postpone the process because USAID representatives were absent. Private Sector Contribution – Although the Haitian private sector has been greatly affected by the current crisis, private firms demonstrated strong interest and willingness to provide donations in an effort to counteract the crisis. Haitian citizens have also demonstrated strong enthusiasm for the SWM program, in spite of high levels of insecurity they have had to face on a daily basis in areas such as Cité Soleil, Belair, Carrefour, Cité Militaire and even Truitier. Clearly, beneficiaries were well aware of the program’s income generation impact for families in their communities. By injecting capital into local firms, CHF also generated indirect employment. Unfortunately these numbers are not reflected in this report. Many of the firms that participated and contributed to waste collection were construction firms. The income they earned from their participation was particularly appreciated in such difficult times. Although the waste collection containers (water tanks converted into garbage cans) were not particularly esthetic or practical, they did enable CHF and its partners to centralize waste and to affect behavior positively: citizens began taking garbage to the garbage cans, rather than disposing of waste in the streets as t...

Related to Recommendations for program replication

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Required Procurement Procedures for Obtaining Goods and Services The Grantee shall provide maximum open competition when procuring goods and services related to the grant-assisted project in accordance with Section 287.057, Florida Statutes.

  • Manufacturer's Recommendations All work or materials shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and requirements. The Contractor shall obtain the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements, for its use at the Site in executing the Work, copies of bulletins, circulars, catalogues, or other publications bearing the manufacturer’s titles, numbers, editions, dates, etc. If the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements are not available, the Contractor shall request installation instructions from the Design Professional.

  • GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWS We may provide you areas on the Site to leave reviews or ratings. When posting a review, you must comply with the following criteria:

  • Recommendations It is recommended that:

  • Office of Supplier Diversity The State of Florida supports its diverse business community by creating opportunities for woman-, veteran-, and minority-owned small business enterprises to participate in procurements and contracts. The Department encourages supplier diversity through certification of woman-, veteran-, and minority-owned small business enterprises and provides advocacy, outreach, and networking through regional business events. For additional information, please contact the Office of Supplier Diversity (OSD) at xxxxxxx@xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Criteria for Promotion 24.04.01 For evaluating each application for promotion, the following general criteria shall apply:

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • HUB Subcontracting Plan The Owner has adopted Exhibit H, Policy on Utilization of Historically Underutilized Business ("Policy"), which is incorporated herein by reference. Contractor, as a provision of the Agreement must comply with the requirements of the Policy and adhere to the HUB Subcontracting Plan submitted with Contractor's Proposal and attached as Exhibit I. No changes to the HUB Subcontracting Plan can be made by the Contractor without the prior written approval of the Owner in accordance with the Policy.

  • State Approval of Replacement Personnel The Engineer may not replace the project manager or key personnel without prior consent of the State. The State must be satisfied that the new project manager or other key personnel is qualified to provide the authorized services. If the State determines that the new project manager or key personnel is not acceptable, the Engineer may not use that person in that capacity and shall replace him or her with one satisfactory to the State within forty-five (45) days.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.