Infrastructure Projects Clause Samples

The 'Infrastructure Projects' clause defines the terms and conditions governing the planning, development, and execution of large-scale construction or public works initiatives within an agreement. It typically outlines the responsibilities of each party, the scope of work, timelines, and compliance with relevant regulations or standards. For example, it may specify requirements for project milestones, reporting, and quality assurance measures. The core function of this clause is to ensure that all parties have a clear understanding of their obligations and the expectations for delivering infrastructure projects, thereby reducing the risk of disputes and delays.
Infrastructure Projects. All Infrastructure Projects
Infrastructure Projects. 9.1 For the purposes of this paragraph 9: “Infrastructure Project” shall mean any of: (i) Meridian Water; (ii) Cambridge resignalling; and such other projects as the Secretary of State may designate as an Infrastructure Project from time to time.
Infrastructure Projects. Infrastructure projects offered local employment opportunities for local people with local firms, a critical step towards building economic growth and recovery within Iraq. These projects required a high degree of professionalism in both technical and financial management. Where possible and prudent, ACDI/VOCA used short-term local supervising engineers and specialists for direct oversight of projects in their own communities. These specialists supervised implementation per local regulations and international best practices. This network permitted ACDI/VOCA to involve professionals from all fields, provided employment opportunities and solid work experience, and reduced administrative costs. In addition, partnerships with competent local institutions, professionals, and private companies helped communities to achieve their goals and vision. Field engineers in the ICAP regional offices assisted the communities in designing their identified projects. When the project was approved, engineers reviewed the design, evaluated competing tenders, and supervised project implementation. The engineers also worked to build capacity at the community level, by introducing modern systems in assessment, monitoring and evaluation of projects. This process that originally started with the ICAP engineers in a direct way, moved to the contractors or bidders in an indirect way. Once the project had started, the local engineers worked directly with the community boards and were in charge of the engineering process. Moreover, the role of the ICAP engineers was also to share best practices and techniques among different communities within the same governorate or with other governorates across Northern Iraq. Since the success of the ICAP was measured (in part) by job creation and person-days of labor, engineers also reviewed public works projects that utilized direct labor, e.g. trash removal campaigns. A further focus of the ICAP engineers was job creation for local contractors, engineers and skilled and unskilled laborers, a critical step towards building economic growth and recovery within Iraq.
Infrastructure Projects. All Infrastructure Projects Water and sewer projects (EC 5.1-5.18) Broadband projects (EC 5.19-5.21) All Expenditure Categories
Infrastructure Projects. Include the construction, improvement, rehabilitation, demolition, repair, restoration, or maintenance of roads and bridges, railways, airports, seaports, communication facilities, civil works components of information technology projects, irrigation, flood control and drainage, water supply, sanitation, sewerage and solid waste management systems, shore protection, energy/power and electrification facilities, national buildings, school buildings, hospital buildings, and other related construction projects of the government.
Infrastructure Projects. HDR will create a resource toolkit for safety infrastructure countermeasures that address safety emphases identified in Task 5 Safety Analysis. The safety infrastructure countermeasures will be provided for review in a slide deck of up to twenty (20) slides – with relevant links to literature on the countermeasures (i.e. literature may cover effectiveness, application, and supporting case study research) .HDR will utilize TAC and Safety Committee meetings (scoped in Task 4 Planning Structure) to review the potential use of countermeasures in the ▇▇▇▇ community and any planning and engineering assumptions for recommending the application of these countermeasures. HDR will subsequently apply countermeasures to ▇▇▇▇ roadway centerline and intersection GIS files. Applications of countermeasures will be limited to a planning-level analysis. In an associated projects table, HDR may identify projects that may have clear feasibility issues to resolve in early design before seeking to program such projects.
Infrastructure Projects. Except in the case of any prepayments expressly, and solely to the extent, contemplated by the NOFA (“Authorized Prepayment(s)”), prior to being reimbursed for any Allowable Expenditures, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s Infrastructure Project must be “complete” as that term is more fully defined and described herein.
Infrastructure Projects