Reference Test Method for Particulate Matter Emissions Sample Clauses

Reference Test Method for Particulate Matter Emissions. Whenever compliance emission testing is required, US EPA Methods 5 and Method 202 shall be used to demonstrate compliance. [s. NR 439.06(1), Wis. Adm. Code] (b) The permittee shall retain on site a statement indicating that natural gas and propane are the only fuels available for combustion at the facility. [s. NR 439.04(1)(d), Wis. Adm. Code]
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reference Test Method for Particulate Matter Emissions. Whenever compliance emissions testing is performed, the following USEPA Methods shall be used: (i) USEPA Method 5 for non-condensable particulate matter and (ii) USEPA Method 202 for condensable particulate matter. [s. NR 439.06(9)(a)1., Wis. Adm. Code.] (2) All testing shall be performed with the emissions unit operating at capacity or as close to capacity as practicable and in accordance with approved procedures. If operation at capacity is not feasible, the source shall operate at a capacity level which is approved by the Department in writing. [s. NR 439.07(1), Wis. Adm. Code] (3) If the biofilter will be used to control VOC or HAP emissions, the permittee shall conduct periodic emission testing consistent with s. NR 439.07 and s. NR 439.075, Wis. Adm. Code, to demonstrate compliance with the VOC emission control efficiency requirement as follows: (1) The Department shall be informed at least 20 working days prior to any stack testing, so a Department representative can witness the testing. At the time of notification, a compliance emission test plan shall also be submitted to the Department for approval. When approved in writing, an equivalent test method may be substituted for the reference test method. The notification and test plan shall be submitted to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. [s. NR 439.07(2), Wis. Adm. Code] (2) Two copies of the report on any compliance emission tests shall be submitted to the Department for evaluation within 60 days following the completion of tests. [s. NR 439.07(9), Wis. Adm. Code]
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Reference Test Method for Particulate Matter Emissions

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Think 12 will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Think 12 must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non- designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Think 12 will be required to provide the results of the Think 12 test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop.

  • Contractor Selection In this section, please describe the selection process, including other sources considered and the rationale for selecting the contractor. Please answer all questions:

  • Substance Abuse Testing The Parties agree that it is in the best interest of all concerned to promote a safe working environment. The Union has no objection to pre-employment substance abuse testing when required by the Employer and further, the Union has no objection to voluntary substance abuse testing to qualify for employment on projects when required by a project owner. The cost and scheduling of such testing shall be paid for and arranged by the Employer. The Union agrees to reimburse the Employer for any failed pre-access Alcohol and Drug test costs.

  • Certification of Meeting or Exceeding Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy Minimum Standards A. Grantee certifies that it has adopted and enforces a Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy that meets or exceeds all of the following minimum standards of:

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Drug Testing (A) The state and the PBA agree to drug testing of employees in accordance with section 112.0455, F.S., the Drug-Free Workplace Act.

  • Performance Testing 7.2.1 The Design-Builder shall direct and supervise the tests and, if necessary, the retests of the Plant using Design-Builder’s supervisory personnel and the Air Emissions Tester shall conduct the air emissions test, in each case, in accordance with the testing procedures set forth in Exhibit A (the “Performance Tests”), to demonstrate, at a minimum, compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria. Owner is responsible for obtaining Air Emissions Tester and for ensuring Air Emissions Tester’s timely performance. Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Air Emissions Tester to facilitate performance of all air emissions tests. Design-Builder shall not be held responsible for the actions of Owner’s employees and third parties involved in the Performance Testing, including but not limited to Air Emissions Tester.

  • Quality- and Cost-Based Selection Except as ADB may otherwise agree, the Borrower shall apply quality- and cost-based selection for selecting and engaging consulting services.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.