Removal of Applicants Facilities Sample Clauses

Removal of Applicants Facilities. 18.1 Responsibility for Removing Facilities 18.1.1 When practicable, Applicant shall give NEVADA at least 30 days’ advance notice in writing of its intent to remove facilities from any part of NEVADA’s conduit system and the proposed method of removal. The notice shall include the locations of the facilities to be removed, the name and telephone number of the manager responsible for removal of the facilities, and the estimated dates when removal of the facilities will begin and end. 18.1.2 Applicant shall, if requested by NEVADA to do so, place a pull mandrel (slug) through all or any specified part of the duct which was occupied by Applicant. 18.1.3 Except as otherwise agreed upon in writing by the Parties, Applicant must, after removing its facilities, plug all previously occupied ducts at the entrances to NEVADA’s manholes (if NEVADA would itself plug the ducts under the same circumstances) in accordance with the standards set by NEVADA for its own operations, provided that such standards have been communicated in writing to Applicant at least 60 days in advance of the removal of Applicant’s facilities. 18.1.4 Applicant shall be solely responsible for the removal of its own facilities from NEVADA’s poles, ducts, conduits, and rights-of-way and for: (a) Paying all persons and entities which provide materials, labor, access to real or personal property, or other goods or services in connection with the removal of Applicant’s facilities from NEVADA’s poles, ducts, conduits, or rights-of-way; and (b) Directing the activities of all such personnel while they are physically present on, within, or in the vicinity of NEVADA’s poles, ducts, conduits, or rights-of-way. 18.1.5 When Applicant no longer intends to occupy space on a NEVADA pole or in a NEVADA duct or conduit, Applicant will provide written notification to NEVADA that it wishes to terminate the permit with respect to such space and will remove its facilities from the space described in the notice. Upon removal of Applicant’s facilities, the permit shall terminate and the space shall be available for reassignment.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Removal of Applicants Facilities 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)

Related to Removal of Applicants Facilities

  • Removal of Equipment Subject, always, to the other terms and provisions of this Fee Agreement, the Company and any Sponsor Affiliates shall be entitled to remove and dispose of components of the Project from the Project in its sole discretion with the result that said components shall no longer be considered a part of the Project and, to the extent such constitute Economic Development Property, shall no longer be subject to the terms of this Fee Agreement. Economic Development Property is disposed of only when it is scrapped or sold or removed from the Project. If it is removed from the Project, it is subject to ad valorem property taxes to the extent the Property remains in the State and is otherwise subject to ad valorem property taxes.

  • OIG Removal of IRO In the event OIG has reason to believe that the IRO does not possess the qualifications described in Paragraph B, is not independent and/or objective as set forth in Paragraph D, or has failed to carry out its responsibilities as described in Paragraph C, OIG may, at its sole discretion, require GSK to engage a new IRO in accordance with Paragraph A of this Appendix. GSK must engage a new IRO within 60 days of termination of the IRO. Prior to requiring GSK to engage a new IRO, OIG shall notify GSK of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a step is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, GSK may present additional information regarding the IRO’s qualifications, independence or performance of its responsibilities. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any differences regarding the IRO with GSK prior to requiring GSK to terminate the IRO. However, the final determination as to whether or not to require GSK to engage a new IRO shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG. I. Covered Functions Review, General Description As specified more fully below, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) shall retain an Independent Review Organization (IRO) (or IROs) to perform reviews (IRO Reviews) to assist GSK in assessing and evaluating its systems, processes, policies, procedures, and practices related to certain of GSK's Covered Functions (collectively, “IRO Covered Functions”). The IRO Review shall consist of two components - a systems review (Systems Review) and a transactions review (Transactions Review) as described more fully below. GSK may engage, at its discretion, a single IRO to perform both components of the IRO Review provided that the entity has the necessary expertise and capabilities to perform both. If there are no material changes in GSK’s systems, processes, policies, and procedures relating to the Covered IRO Functions, the IRO shall perform the Systems Review for the second and fifth IRO Reporting Periods. If GSK materially changes its systems, processes, policies, and procedures relating to the Covered IRO Functions, the IRO shall perform a Systems Review for the IRO Reporting Period(s) in which such changes were made in addition to conducting the Review for the second and fifth IRO Reporting Periods. The additional Systems Review(s) shall consist of: 1) an identification of the material changes; 2) an assessment of whether other systems, processes, policies, and procedures previously reported did not materially change; and 3) a review of the systems, processes, policies, and procedures that materially changed. The IRO shall conduct the Transactions Review for each IRO Reporting Period of the CIA.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!