Reputational Risk Sample Clauses

Reputational Risk. Both Partners have plans and policies in place to manage reputational issues. Each Partner will co-operate with the other in managing any reputational risk that may arise with that other Partner.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reputational Risk. If during the term, Xxxxxxx Entertainment becomes aware of any facts or circumstances in connection with the Huron Country Playhouse II, that if made public would reasonably expose the Municipality of South Huron to unwarranted reputational risk, then the Artistic Director or Executive Director of Drayton Entertainment or his or her designate, shall promptly notify the Chief Administrative Officer of the Municipality of South Huron, or his or her designate, of same and consult with him or her as to the approach Drayton Entertainment intends to take with respect to the matter, it being acknowledged by the parties that minimization of harm to the reputation of the parties is in the best interests of all of the parties.
Sample 1
Reputational Risk. 2.1 Adverse publicity occurs related to the nature of the preferred solution Non financial 2 1 2 Ensure public and stakeholder input and engagement Thorough engagement process with wide range of clinical stakeholders and public representation. Stakeholder event for communication and feedback on project
Sample 1
Reputational Risk. As a minimum, Ministers expect to be alerted about any incident where it is possible the media could become aware, and the details of the incident could be presented in such a way that could be damaging to the reputation of the Department and the Government. Other features of incidents (apart from involvement of the media) may present a threat of significant embarrassment or reputational damage to the Department. The Client will wish to consider alerting Ministers where and incident involves: high profile activity such as large-scale notifications to affected individuals; the particular circumstances of affected individuals, or mishandling or deliberate/malign actions by staff that could lead to severe criticism.
Sample 1

Related to Reputational Risk

  • Reputation 21.14.1 Layoff pursuant to this Article is not dismissal for cause and shall not be recorded or reported as such.

  • Insurers The Contractor shall obtain insurance from insurance companies identified as an admitted insurer/carrier in the State of Washington, with a Best’s Reports’ rating of B++, Class VII, or better. Surplus Lines insurance companies will have a rating of A-, Class VII, or better.

  • Windstorm or hail This peril does not include loss to the property contained in a building caused by rain, snow, sleet, sand or dust unless the direct force of wind or hail damages the building causing an opening in a roof or wall and the rain, snow, sleet, sand or dust enters through this opening. This peril includes loss to watercraft and their trailers, furnishings, equipment, and outboard engines or motors, only while inside a fully enclosed building.

  • Impact direct impact on people does not necessarily require direct contact, for example, environmental health, trading standards and similar officers may have a direct impact on people, through the implementation or enforcement of regulations, without necessarily having direct contact with those who benefit.

  • Hazards The Tenant shall not undertake, or permit his/her family or guests to undertake, any hazardous acts or do anything that will increase the project's insurance premiums. Such action constitutes a material non-compliance. If the unit is damaged by fire, wind, or rain to the extent that the unit cannot be lived in and the damage is not caused or made worse by the Tenant, the Tenant will be responsible for rent only up to the date of the destruction. Additional rent will not accrue until the unit has been repaired to a livable condition.

  • Aggravating and Mitigating Factors The penalties in this matter were determined in consideration of all relevant circumstances, including statutory factors as described in CARB’s Enforcement Policy. CARB considered whether the violator came into compliance quickly and cooperated with the investigation; the extent of harm to public health, safety and welfare; nature and persistence of the violation, including the magnitude of the excess emissions; compliance history; preventative efforts taken; innovative nature and the magnitude of the effort required to comply, and the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the available test methods; efforts to attain, or provide for, compliance prior to violation; action taken to mitigate the violation; financial burden to the violator; and voluntary disclosure. The penalties are set at levels sufficient to deter violations, to remove any economic benefit or unfair advantage from noncompliance, to obtain swift compliance, and the potential costs, risks, and uncertainty associated with litigation. Penalties in future cases might be smaller or larger depending on the unique circumstances of the case.

  • Damage Risk of loss up to and including the Closing Date shall be borne by Sellers except as expressly set forth herein. In the event of any material damage to or destruction of the Property or any portion thereof, Buyer may, at its option, by notice to Sellers (with a copy to Escrow Holder) given within ten (10) Business Days after Sellers notify Buyer in writing of such damage or destruction (and if necessary the Closing Date shall be extended to give Buyer the full 10-day period to make such election): (i) terminate this Agreement, in which event Escrow Holder shall, upon receipt of Buyer’s notice to terminate this Agreement, return the Deposit to Buyer and the parties shall have no further obligations hereunder (except the indemnity obligations of each party, which shall survive indefinitely and any other obligations set forth herein which expressly survive the termination of this Agreement), or (ii) proceed under this Agreement with no adjustment of the Purchase Price, receive any insurance proceeds (including any rent loss insurance applicable to any period on and after the Closing Date) due Sellers as a result of such damage or destruction and assume responsibility for such repair, and Buyer shall receive a credit at Closing for any deductible amount under said insurance policies and any uninsured or underinsured loss. If Buyer elects (ii) above, Sellers will cooperate with Buyer in obtaining the insurance proceeds and such agreements from Sellers’ insurers. If the Property is not materially damaged, then the parties shall proceed to Closing as provided in clause (ii) above. “Material damage” and “Materially damaged” means damage (w) resulting in the Property not complying with all legal requirements applicable to the Property, (x) reasonably exceeding $300,000 or (y) that entitles any tenant of the Property to terminate its Lease, or (z) which, in Buyer’s or Sellers’ reasonable estimation, will take longer than 120 days to repair.

  • Loss or Damage Lessee hereby assumes and shall bear the entire risk of any loss, theft, damage to, or destruction of, any unit of Equipment from any cause whatsoever from the time the Equipment is shipped to Lessee.

  • Vandalism Or Malicious Mischief This peril does not include loss to property on the "residence premises", and any ensuing loss caused by any intentional and wrongful act com- mitted in the course of the vandalism or malicious mischief, if the dwelling has been vacant for more than 60 consecutive days immediately before the loss. A dwelling being constructed is not consid- ered vacant.

  • Dependability Compliance with instructions and regulations; reliability under varying conditions. ☐ Unsatisfactory Frequently undependable. ☐ Needs Improvement ☐ Meets Expectations Dependable under normal circumstances. ☐ Exceeds Expectations ☐ Outstanding Thoroughly reliable on assignments. Remarks: Click here to enter remarks

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.