Results for method agreement Sample Clauses

Results for method agreement. ‌ Tables 2-3 present the results at significance level 0.05. It shows that the estimates of β1 − β2 are 0.0276 under Model 1; 0.5706 under Model 2, which are close to the true values 0 under Model 1 and 0.6 under Model 2, respectively. Under Model 1, we do not reject the null hypothesis β1 = β2 with p-value 0.8739 . Under Model 2, the p-value for testing (2.4) is 0.0010, which shows a significant difference between β1 and β2. All these testing results agree with the underlying truth. The Xxxxx-Xxxxxx diagrams on both the latent scale and the probability scale are shown in Figures 1a - 1d. As we can see in all diagrams, the points are around zero in a random manner, so there is no systematic pattern. The Table 2: Estimation for the difference between methods, β1 − β2. Model Estimate SE P-value 95% CI Model 1 0.0276 0.1731 0.8739 (−0.3211, 0.3764) Model 2 0.5706 0.1627 0.0010 (0.2437, 0.8975) σ2 σ2 0.7578 0.1804 0.1511 0.0770 Model 1 σ2 0.4886 0.1707 σ2 σ2 0.7179 0.1842 0.1424 0.0835 Model 2 σ2 0.3756 0.1316 γ α1 α2 γ α1 α2 dashed line shows the mean difference, and the dotted lines indicate the 95% limits of agreement. On both the latent scale and the probability scale, about 95 out of 100 points lie within the 95% limits of agreement. Under Model 1, the mean difference is 0.04, which is close to the true difference 0. Under Model 2, the mean difference is 0.57, close to the true difference 0.6 and also nearly the same as the difference 0.5706 estimated by the GLMM shown in Table 2. The ICCs for two measuring methods are calculated based on (2.10) and estimates of variance components from Table 3. Table 4 summarizes the results of the ICCs. The true ICCs for Methods 1 and 2 are given by 0.9 and 0.8182, respectively. Therefore, the simulated results in Table 4 are close to the true values of the ICCs for two measuring methods. We also investigate the performance of our implementation of Xxxxx’x kappa compared to xxxxx Xxxxx’x kappa, that is, directly applying Xxxxx’x kappa to the observed data with correlated repeated measurements. For β1 = β2, our ap- (a) Model 1 on the latent scale. (b) Model 1 on the probability scale. (c) Model 2 on the latent scale. (d) Model 2 on the probability scale. Figure 1: The Xxxxx-Xxxxxx diagrams.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Results for method agreement

  • Method and Content The State shall notify Grantee of such termination in accordance with §16. The notice shall specify the effective date of the termination and whether it affects all or a portion of this Grant.

  • First Method and Loss If the First Method and Loss apply, the Defaulting Party will pay to the Non-defaulting Party, if a positive number, the Non-defaulting Party's Loss in respect of this Agreement.

  • Method and Time of Exercise This Option shall be exercisable by any method permitted by the Plan and this Agreement that is made available from time to time by the external third party administrator of the Options. An exercise may be made with respect to whole Shares only, and not for a fraction of a Share. Shares shall not be issued under the Plan unless the issuance and delivery of such Shares comply with (or are exempt from) all applicable requirements of law, including (without limitation) the Securities Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, state securities laws and regulations, and the regulations of any stock exchange or other securities market on which the Company’s securities may then be traded. The Committee may require the Optionee to take any reasonable action in order to comply with any such rules or regulations. Assuming such compliance, for income tax purposes the Shares shall be considered transferred to the Optionee on the date the Option is exercised with respect to such Shares.

  • Second Method and Loss If the Second Method and Loss apply, an amount will be payable equal to the Non-defaulting Party's Loss in respect of this Agreement. If that amount is a positive number, the Defaulting Party will pay it to the Non-defaulting Party; if it is a negative number, the Non-defaulting Party will pay the absolute value of that amount to the Defaulting Party.

  • First Method and Market Quotation If the First Method and Market Quotation apply, the Defaulting Party will pay to the Non-defaulting Party the excess, if a positive number, of (A) the sum of the Settlement Amount (determined by the Non-defaulting Party) in respect of the Terminated Transactions and the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Unpaid Amounts owing to the Non-defaulting Party over (B) the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Unpaid Amounts owing to the Defaulting Party.

  • CFR PART 200 AND FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXPLANATION TIPS and TIPS Members will sometimes seek to make purchases with federal funds. In accordance with 2 C.F.R. Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (sometimes referred to as “XXXXX”),Vendor's response to the following questions labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will indicate Vendor's willingness and ability to comply with certain requirements which may be applicable to TIPS purchases paid for with federal funds, if accepted by Vendor. Your responses to the following questions labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will dictate whether TIPS can list this awarded contract as viable to be considered for a federal fund purchase. Failure to certify all requirements labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will mean that your contract is listed as not viable for the receipt of federal funds. However, it will not prevent award. If you do enter into a TIPS Sale when you are accepting federal funds, the contract between you and the TIPS Member will likely require these same certifications.

  • CFR PART 200 Contract Provisions Explanation Required Federal contract provisions of Federal Regulations for Contracts for contracts with ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members: The following provisions are required to be in place and agreed if the procurement is funded in any part with federal funds. The ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members are the subgrantee or Subrecipient by definition. Most of the provisions are located in 2 CFR PART 200 - Appendix II to Part 200—Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards at 2 CFR PART 200. Others are included within 2 CFR part 200 et al. In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non- Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable.

  • Second Method and Market Quotation If the Second Method and Market Quotation apply, an amount will be payable equal to (A) the sum of the Settlement Amount (determined by the Non-defaulting Party) in respect of the Terminated Transactions and the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Unpaid Amounts owing to the Non-defaulting Party less (B) the Termination Currency Equivalent of the Unpaid Amounts owing to the Defaulting Party. If that amount is a positive number, the Defaulting Party will pay it to the Non-defaulting Party; if it is a negative number, the Non-defaulting Party will pay the absolute value of that amount to the Defaulting Party.

  • METHOD OF AWARD AND PROCEDURE FOR AWARDING A SOW AGREEMENT 5.1. Contractor selection, or the determination to terminate the SOW-RFP without award, shall be done in the best interest of the State.

  • Settlement Method Election Physical Settlement, Cash Settlement, or Net Share Settlement, at the election of Counterparty as set forth in a Settlement Notice that satisfies the Settlement Notice Requirements; provided that Physical Settlement shall apply (i) if no Settlement Method is validly selected, (ii) with respect to any Settlement Shares in respect of which Dealer is unable, in good faith and in its commercially reasonable discretion, to unwind its commercially reasonable hedge by the end of the Unwind Period (taking into account any Additional Transactions with overlapping “Unwind Periods” (as defined in the applicable Additional Confirmations)) (A) in a manner that, in the reasonable discretion of Dealer, based on advice of counsel, is consistent with the requirements for qualifying for the safe harbor provided by Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 10b-18”) or (B) in its commercially reasonable judgment, due to the occurrence of five or more Disrupted Days or to the lack of sufficient liquidity in the Shares on any Exchange Business Day during the Unwind Period, (iii) to any Termination Settlement Date (as defined under “Termination Settlement” in Paragraph 7(g) below) and (iv) if the Final Date is a Settlement Date other than as the result of a valid Settlement Notice, in respect of such Settlement Date; provided, further, that, if Physical Settlement applies under clause (ii) immediately above, Dealer shall provide written notice to Counterparty at least two Scheduled Trading Days prior to the applicable Settlement Date.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!