Review and Consult. Xxxxxxx will have the right to consult with Morphic regarding the content of the patent applications included in the Morphic Prosecuted Patents in advance of filing thereof with any patent authority, prior art searches and correspondence and to comment thereon to Morphic, or at Morphic’s request, to Morphic’s designated outside counsel, and Morphic will provide Xxxxxxx with all material correspondence received from any patent authority in connection therewith. In addition, Morphic will provide Xxxxxxx with drafts of proposed material filings and correspondence to any patent authority in connection with the Prosecution and Maintenance of any Morphic Prosecuted Patent for Xxxxxxx’x review and comment prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondence. Morphic will consider in good faith all such comments offered by Xxxxxxx and will incorporate such comments where appropriate.
Review and Consult. Ionis will consult with Otsuka and keep Otsuka reasonably informed regarding the Patent Prosecution of the Ionis Product-Specific Patents in the Otsuka Territory and the Patent Prosecution of the Joint Collaboration Patent Rights worldwide and will provide Otsuka with all substantive correspondence received from any patent authority in connection therewith no later than [***] after receipt thereof. In addition, Xxxxx will provide Otsuka with drafts of proposed substantive filings in the Otsuka Territory and correspondence to any patent authority in the Otsuka Territory in connection with the Patent Prosecution of the Ionis Product-Specific Patents and with drafts of proposed substantive filings in the Territory and correspondence to any patent authority in the Territory in connection with the Patent Prosecution of Joint Collaboration Patent Rights, in each case for Otsuka’s review and comment at least [***] prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondence, which comments (if any) Otsuka must provide no later than [***] after receipt of the applicable filing or correspondence. Xxxxx will consider in good xxxxx Xxxxxx’x reasonable comments on the Patent Prosecution of the Ionis Product-Specific Patents in the Otsuka Territory and the Joint Collaboration Patent Rights in the Territory, but Xxxxx will have final decision-making authority regarding Patent Prosecution of such Patent Rights under this Section 10.2.1(b) (Review and Consult).
Review and Consult. Partner will consult with Kiniksa and keep Kiniksa reasonably informed regarding the Patent Prosecution of the Partner Collaboration Patent Rights and will provide Kiniksa with all substantive correspondence received from any patent authority in connection therewith. In addition, Partner will provide Kiniksa with drafts of all proposed substantive filings and correspondence to any patent authority in connection with the Patent Prosecution of the Partner Collaboration Patent Rights for Kiniksa’s review and comment at least [***] days prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondence, which comments (if any) Kiniksa must provide no later than [***] Business Days after receipt of the applicable filing or correspondence. Further, Partner will notify Kiniksa of any decision to cease Patent Prosecution of any Partner Collaboration Patent Rights. Partner will consider Kiniksa’s reasonable comments on Patent Prosecution and will incorporate such comments where appropriate.
Review and Consult. Otsuka will consult with Xxxxx and keep Ionis reasonably informed regarding the Patent Prosecution of the Otsuka Patent Rights and will provide Ionis with all substantive correspondence received from any patent authority in connection therewith no later than [***] after receipt thereof. In addition, Otsuka will provide Ionis with drafts of all proposed substantive filings and correspondence to any patent authority in connection with the Patent Prosecution of the Otsuka Patent Rights for Xxxxx’ review and comment at least [***] prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondence, which comments (if any) Ionis must provide no later than [***] after receipt of the applicable filing or correspondence. Otsuka will consider in good xxxxx Xxxxx’ reasonable comments on the Patent Prosecution of the Otsuka Patent Rights, but will have final decision-making authority regarding Patent Prosecution of such Patent Rights under this Section 10.2.1(b) (Review and Consult).
Review and Consult. The Prosecuting Party will consult with the other Party and keep the other Party reasonably informed of the Patent Prosecution of the Joint Collaboration Patent Rights in its respective territory and will provide the other Party with all substantive correspondence received from any patent authority in such territory in connection therewith. In addition, the Prosecuting Party will provide the other Party with drafts of all proposed substantive filings and correspondence to any patent authority in its respective territory in connection with the Patent Prosecution of the Joint Collaboration Patent Rights for the other Party’s review and comment prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondence. Further, the Prosecuting Party will notify the other Party of any decision to cease Patent Prosecution of any of the Joint Collaboration Patent Rights in its respective territory. The Prosecuting Party will consider the other Party’s comments on Patent Prosecution but will have final decision-making authority under this Section 14.2.3(b) (Review and Consult).
Review and Consult. Kiniksa will consult with Partner and keep Partner reasonably informed regarding the Patent Prosecution of the Kiniksa Patent Rights in the Territory and will provide Partner with substantive correspondence received from any patent authority in the Territory in connection therewith no later than [***] days after Kiniksa’s receipt thereof. In addition, Kiniksa will provide Partner with drafts (in English) of proposed substantive filings in the Territory and correspondence to any patent authority in the Territory in connection with the Patent Prosecution of the Kiniksa Patent Rights in the Territory for Partner’s review and comment prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondence, which comments (if any) Partner must provide no later than [***] Business Days after receipt of the applicable filing or correspondence. Further, Kiniksa will notify Partner of any decision to cease Patent Prosecution of any Kiniksa Patent Rights in the Territory. Kiniksa will consider Partner’s reasonable comments on Patent Prosecution, but will have final decision-making authority under this Section 14.3.1(b) (Review and Consult). The Parties, through their respective IP counsels, will discuss the strategy for the portfolio of Patent Rights Covering the Licensed Product in the Territory.
Review and Consult. Partner will consult with ImmunoGen and keep ImmunoGen reasonably informed regarding the Patent Prosecution of the Partner Collaboration Patent Rights and will provide ImmunoGen with all substantive correspondence received from any patent authority in connection therewith no later than [***] after receipt thereof. In addition, Partner will provide ImmunoGen with drafts of all proposed substantive filings and correspondence to any patent authority in connection with the Patent Prosecution of the Partner Collaboration Patent Rights for ImmunoGen’s review and comment at least [***] prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondence, which comments (if any) ImmunoGen must provide no later than [***] after receipt of the applicable filing or correspondence. Further, Partner will notify ImmunoGen of any decision to cease Patent Prosecution of any Partner Collaboration Patent Rights. Partner will consider ImmunoGen’s comments on Patent Prosecution in good faith and will incorporate such comments where appropriate, but will have final decision-making authority under this Section 14.4.1(b) (Review and Consult).
Review and Consult. Licensor will use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to consult with Licensee and keep Licensee informed regarding the Patent Prosecution of the Licensor Patent Rights in Japan and will provide Licensee with all substantive correspondence
Review and Consult. The Parties will instruct the Joint Firm to consult with the Parties and keep the Parties reasonably informed of the prosecution of the Joint Patents in each Territory and will provide each Party with all substantive correspondence received from any patent authority in each Territory in connection therewith and drafts of all proposed substantive filings and correspondence to any patent authority in each Territory in connection with the prosecution of the Joint Patents for review and comment prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondence. Each Party will consider in good faith and incorporate the other Party’s reasonable comments on such prosecution; provided, however, that following the filing of any Joint Patent in the ADCT Territory or the Sobi Territory, [**].
Review and Consult. CStone will consult with Blueprint and keep Blueprint reasonably informed of the Patent Prosecution of the CStone General Collaboration Patent Rights and will provide Blueprint with all material correspondence received from any patent authority in connection therewith. In addition, CStone will provide Blueprint with drafts of all proposed material filings and correspondence to any patent authority in connection with the Patent Prosecution of the CStone General Collaboration Patent Rights for Blueprint’s review and comment prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondence. Further, CStone will notify Blueprint of any decision to cease Patent Prosecution of any CStone General Collaboration Patent Rights. CStone will consider Blueprint’s comments on Patent Prosecution [***] and will incorporate such comments [***].
