Review of Requests Sample Clauses

Review of Requests. If the Participating Institution of the Overall PI (or of the requesting Site Investigator as provided above) determines that the Research may be appropriate for Ceded Review, that Participating Institution shall consult, as needed, with relevant Participating Institutions (or designee(s)) involved in the particular Research to determine whether each agrees that the requested Research is appropriate for Ceded Review. If any Participating Institution disagrees that the Research is appropriate for Ceded Review and declines to participate in the Ceded Review, the Research shall remain eligible for Ceded Review with respect to the other Participating Institutions that have agreed, if any. No Participating Institution shall be obligated to participate as a Reviewing IRB Institution or a Relying Institution with regard to any particular Research. Should a Participating Institution decide to participate as a Reviewing IRB Institution or a Relying Institution with regard to any particular Research, no additional individual authorization or reliance agreements need to be completed to effectuate the Ceded Review.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review of Requests. After a Reviewing IRB has signed the Penn-CHOP Determination form as described above, the investigator seeking review will provide to the other IRB (the “Relying Institution”) a copy of the protocol, applicable supporting documents (e.g., IRB approval letter(s), institution-specific consent form approved by the Reviewing IRB), and Penn-CHOP Determination Form. The Relying IRB will then determine whether or not to rely on the other institution’s IRB for the applicable study and will document its decision on the Penn-CHOP Determination Form. Any study described in an appropriately executed Penn-CHOP Determination Form will be considered “Research” for purposes of this Agreement.
Sample 1
Review of Requests. If the Participating Institution of the Overall PI (or of the requesting Site Investigator as provided above) determines that the Research may be appropriate for Ceded Reviewa Reliance Request is appropriate, that Participating Institution shall consult, as needed, with other relevant Participating Institutions (or designee(s)) involved in the particular Research to determine whether each agrees that the requested Research is appropriate for Ceded ReviewReliance Request is appropriate. As part of the consultation, each involved Participating Institution that extends its Assurance to Research that is not federally funded must inform all the other involved Participating Institutions of the applicability of its Assurance to the Research. If any Participating Institution disagrees that the Research is appropriate for Ceded Review and declines to participate in the Ceded Review, the Research shall remain eligible for Ceded Review with respect to the other Participating Institutions that have agreed, if any. No Participating Institution shall be obligated to participate as a Reviewing IRB Institution or a Relying Institution with regard to any particular Research. Should a Participating Institution decide to participate as a Reviewing IRB Institution or a Relying Institution with regard to any particular Research, no additional individual authorization or reliance agreements need to be completed to effectuate the Ceded Review.
Sample 1
Review of Requests. After a Reviewing IRB has signed the DU-CHOP Determination form as described above, the investigator seeking review will provide to the other IRB (the “Relying Institution”) a copy of the protocol, applicable supporting documents (e.g., IRB approval letter(s), institution-specific consent form approved by the Reviewing IRB), and DU-CHOP Determination Form. The Relying IRB will then determine whether or not to rely on the other institution’s IRB for the applicable study and will document its decision on the
Sample 1
Review of Requests. A Participating Institution receiving a request to conduct a Ceded Review shall consult with the other relevant IRBs to determine whether each agrees that the requested Research qualifies for Ceded Review.
Sample 1

Related to Review of Requests

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Rationale/Justification The Cisco Certified Network Associate Security (CCNA® Security) certification represents industry acknowledgement of technical skill attainment of competencies in the IT Security program.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Timeliness of Submitting Orders You are obliged to date and indicate the time of receipt of all orders you receive from your customers and to transmit promptly all orders to us in time to provide for processing at the price next determined after receipt by you, in accordance with the Prospectuses. You are not to withhold placing with us orders received from any customers for the purchase of shares. You shall not purchase shares through us except for the purpose of covering purchase orders already received by you, or for your bona fide investment.

  • Resubmission If terminated, resolved or withdrawn, a grievance cannot be resubmitted.

  • Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!