Reward Deficiency Syndrome Sample Clauses

Reward Deficiency Syndrome. The Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) results from a dysfunction of the dopaminergic reward system of the brain. The RDS was firstly referred to in research of addictive behaviours – and particularly in studies of alcoholism (Xxxx, Xxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, & Xxxxxxx, 1996; Xxxx & Xxxxx, 1990). The RDS originated from the association between alcoholism and the dopamine receptor gene DRD2 (Xxxx et al., 1996). Dopamine is an important neurotransmitter in the brain’s reward system and is known to control moods and feelings of well-being (Xxxxxxx, 2007). Individuals who suffer from underactivation (i.e. a deficiency) of the dopaminergic system, often due to genetic predispositions, will engage in activities that increase the activation of the system in order to receive the pleasant stimulation of its activation (Comings & Xxxx, 2000). Whereas the RDS originated from genetics, it has now come to refer to a dysfunctional state of the reward system independent of any specific genetics (Xxxx, Cull, et al., 1996; Xxxx & Xxxxx, 1990; Xxxxxx, et al., 2011). Several reward- related disorders, such as addictions and ADHD, are characterised by deficient activation of brain regions in response to rewards and are thus referred to as reward deficiency disorders (Xxxx, Xxxx, et al., 1996). In fact, the RDS has been suggested to explain a number of reward seeking behaviour such as extreme impulsivity and novelty seeking, which are often manifested in the form of antisocial behaviours (Comings & Xxxx, 2000). The reward deficiency hypothesis may help explain increased risk taking in adolescence as well as reward-related disorders such as ADHD (see Table 1 and Table 2). The impulsivity hypothesis is an opposing theory of the RDS hypothesis. It suggests that a combination of excessive reward seeking and failure of effective inhibition underlies novelty seeking and impulsive behaviour. Whereas the RDS hypothesis suggests that novelty seeking and impulsivity are the result of an underactive reward system, the impulsivity hypothesis suggests that these behaviours result from an overactive reward system in combination with insufficient inhibitory control (Ernst, Xxxx, & Xxxxxx, 2006; Xxxxxx, Xxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 2011). The impulsivity hypothesis was initially based on the fact that longitudinal studies suggested that individuals who demonstrated poor behavioural self-control or high novelty seeking in childhood were substantially more likely to initiate substance use and other reward seeking beha...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Reward Deficiency Syndrome

  • Anti-Deficiency Act Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §1341 nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as binding the NPS to expend in any one fiscal year any sum in excess of appropriations made by Congress, for the purposes of this Agreement for that fiscal year, or other obligation for the further expenditure of money in excess of such appropriations.

  • Reportable Events No such Employee Benefit Plan which is an Employee Pension Benefit Plan has been completely or partially terminated or been the subject of a Reportable Event as to which notices would be required to be filed with the PBGC. No proceeding by the PBGC to terminate any such Employee Pension Benefit Plan has been instituted or threatened; and

  • Waiver; Deficiency Each Grantor waives and agrees not to assert any rights or privileges which it may acquire under Section 9-112 of the New York UCC. Each Grantor shall remain liable for any deficiency if the proceeds of any sale or other disposition of the Collateral are insufficient to pay its Obligations and the fees and disbursements of any attorneys employed by the Administrative Agent or any Lender to collect such deficiency.

  • Self-Funded Leave Plan (a) The Self-Funded Leave Plan shall afford an Employee the opportunity to enter into an agreement with the Board to take a one year Self-Funded Leave. During the leave term the Employee shall agree to be paid at: (i) 5/6 leave plan 83% of salary (ii) 4/5 leave plan 80% of salary (iii) 3/4 leave plan 75% of salary

  • Definition of Reportable Event For purposes of this CIA, a “Reportable Event” means anything that involves: a. a substantial Overpayment; b. a matter that a reasonable person would consider a probable violation of criminal, civil, or administrative laws applicable to any Federal health care program for which penalties or exclusion may be authorized; c. the employment of or contracting with a Covered Person who is an Ineligible Person as defined by Section III.G.1.a; or d. the filing of a bankruptcy petition by Good Shepherd. A Reportable Event may be the result of an isolated event or a series of occurrences.

  • Reportable Event Reportable Event" means a "reportable event" as defined in Section 4043(b) of ERISA.

  • Retainage for Unacceptable Corrective Action Plan or Plan Failure If the corrective action plan is unacceptable to the Department or Customer, or implementation of the plan fails to remedy the performance deficiencies, the Department or Customer will retain ten percent (10%) of the total invoice amount. The retainage will be withheld until the Contractor resolves the performance deficiencies. If the performance deficiencies are resolved, the Contractor may invoice the Department or Customer for the retained amount. If the Contractor fails to resolve the performance deficiencies, the retained amount will be forfeited to compensate the Department or Customer for the performance deficiencies.

  • ERISA Reportable Event A reportable event with respect to a Guaranteed Pension Plan within the meaning of §4043 of ERISA and the regulations promulgated thereunder as to which the requirement of notice has not been waived.

  • Adverse Proceedings, etc There are no Adverse Proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Neither Holdings nor any of its Subsidiaries (a) is in violation of any applicable laws (including Environmental Laws) that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, or (b) is subject to or in default with respect to any final judgments, writs, injunctions, decrees, rules or regulations of any court or any federal, state, municipal or other governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Reportable Events under Section III J.1.d. For Reportable Events under Section III.J.1.d, the report to OIG shall include documentation of the bankruptcy filing and a description of any Federal health care program requirements implicated.‌

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!