Rodenhuize Power Plant Sample Clauses

Rodenhuize Power Plant. One of the key case studies on the power plant and boiler modifications for biomass co-firing is the Rodenhuize Advanced Green and Xxx Xxxxx project, which involved all of the engineering and other activities specific to the co-firing and firing of wood pellets. Main information on Rodenhuize Unit 4: Type: Opposed wall fired outdoor water-tube boiler with and gastight walls. Make: Brouhon under Xxxxx licence Year of construction: 1974 Design fuel: BFG and HFO Power: 745 MWth / 285 MWel (original design) Conversions: 1989 converted to coal firing natural circulation 2005 converted to 65 MWel pellet co-firing with coal (“Light Green”) 2008 converted to 135 MWel pellet co-firing with coal (“Advanced Green”) 2011 converted to 560 MWth / 195 MWel 100% wood pellet firing (“Xxx Xxxxx”) Xxx Xxxxx fuel: Industrial wood pellets The conversion of the unit 4 to 100% biomass firing was a stepwise process with a gradual increase of the biomass co-firing rate. The biomass milling plant consists of three more or less identical systems, each comprising: • A buffer silo of 2,000 m³; • 4 fast rotating hammer xxxxx of 10-13.5 t/h each • Pneumatic transport system for wood dust transport to the burners.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Rodenhuize Power Plant

  • Reactive Power 1.8.1 The Interconnection Customer shall design its Small Generating Facility to maintain a composite power delivery at continuous rated power output at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all similarly situated generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis.

  • Real and Reactive Power Control 36 9.6 Outages and Interruptions. 37 9.7 Switching and Tagging Rules. 41 9.8 Use of Attachment Facilities by Third Parties. 41 9.9 Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange. 42 ARTICLE 10. MAINTENANCE 42 10.1 Connecting Transmission Owner Obligations. 42 10.2 Developer Obligations. 42 10.3 Coordination. 42 10.4 Secondary Systems. 42 10.5 Operating and Maintenance Expenses. 43 ARTICLE 11. PERFORMANCE OBLIGATION 43

  • Police Powers The Grantee agrees to comply with the terms of any lawfully adopted generally applicable local ordinance necessary to the safety, health, and welfare of the public, to the extent that the provisions of the ordinance do not have the effect of limiting the benefits or expanding the obligations of the Grantee that are granted by this Franchise. This Franchise is a contract and except as to those changes which are the result of the Grantor’s lawful exercise of its general police power, the Grantor may not take any unilateral action which materially changes the mutual promises in this contract.

  • Variance Power All funds established at the Foundation are subject to the Foundation’s “variance power”, required by Treasury Regulations for the Foundation and its donors to enjoy the more favorable income tax treatment of a community foundation as opposed to the less favorable income tax treatment of a private foundation. Treasury Regulations Section 170A-9(e)(11)(v)(B)(1) specifically states that the governing body of a community foundation must have the power “to modify any restriction or condition on the distributions of funds for any specified charitable purpose or to specified organizations if, in the sole judgment of the governing body (without the necessity of approval by any participating trustee, custodian or agent), such restriction becomes, in effect, unnecessary, incapable of fulfillment, or inconsistent with the charitable needs of the community or area served”.

  • Corporate Power The Company has all requisite corporate power to execute and deliver this Agreement and to carry out and perform its obligations under the terms of this Agreement.

  • Cloud Computing State Risk and Authorization Management Program In accordance with Senate Bill 475, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., pursuant to Texas Government Code, Section 2054.0593, Contractor acknowledges and agrees that, if providing cloud computing services for System Agency, Contractor must comply with the requirements of the state risk and authorization management program and that System Agency may not enter or renew a contract with Contractor to purchase cloud computing services for the agency that are subject to the state risk and authorization management program unless Contractor demonstrates compliance with program requirements. If providing cloud computing services for System Agency that are subject to the state risk and authorization management program, Contractor certifies it will maintain program compliance and certification throughout the term of the Contract.

  • Contractor’s Power and Authority The Contractor warrants that it has the full power and authority to grant the rights herein granted and will hold the County hereunder harmless from and against any loss, cost, liability and expense, including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of any breach of this warranty. Further, the Contractor avers that it will not enter into any arrangement with any third party which might abridge any rights of the County under this Contract.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.

  • Reactive Power and Primary Frequency Response 9.6.1 Power Factor Design Criteria

  • Electrical Power CUSTOMER acknowledges that the Services will not function in the absence of electrical power.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.