Scheduling Problem Sample Clauses

Scheduling Problem. This optimization tool focuses on addressing the transportation plan for the factory for a given resources schedule. In this solution the resources (machines) schedule is already defined by another agent while this agent is assigned with the transportation tasks associated with the resource tasks. The objective of this agent is to minimize the earliness/ lateness of delivering the material to the location of the resource that the resource task is going to be performed. It is important to highlight that this scheduling solution requires the existence of the resources schedule in order for this solution to work. This introduces the following limitations: In re-scheduling/ dynamic scheduling solutions the agent waits for resources planning to be completed before starting any optimization services. This requires a more flexible response delay for the system. Since the two schedules are split into two different problems there is no guarantee in the inheritance between the material delivery deadlines and the actual time required to deliver the material, considering AGVs availability, transportation distances, and release time of the material. This could usually introduce lateness in the production schedule. However, dealing the transportation problem independently, as presented in the figure bellow provides the following advantages: The agent requires less time to schedule any given problem, in comparison to the integrated scheduling solution. There are lower resources utilization requirements which makes the algorithms easier to run on local computational resources of the factory. There is a lower number of decision variables which makes the algorithm more accurate on approximating the optimal value of the objective function Figure 41 High-level design of the proposed scheduling problem
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Scheduling Problem. Similar to previous scheduling methodology for transportation vehicles, this scheduling agent is used in order to give a model-based optimization solution. The difference between this solution and the one in section 3.3.5 is that it provides the flexibility in describing the position of the vehicles rather than the transportation that are assigned with. This gives the ability to have a dynamic behaviour even if no tasks have allocated to the AGV. The proposed modelling provides the following advantages and disadvantages The position of the AGV will be defined more flexibly giving the ability to move AGVs without assigning any tasks which can allow handle factory spaces and processes better. The AGV could handle more than one items at the same time in cases where the environment constrains allow it The complexity of the model increases, and more flexible response timeslots are required

Related to Scheduling Problem

  • Shift Scheduling The parties agree that the following shift schedules are examples of the type which will provide the flexibility required to meet the needs expressed above provided the provisions of Article VII Section 4 (b) (i) and (ii) have been met.

  • Problem Solving Employees and supervisors are encouraged to attempt to resolve on an informal basis, at the earliest opportunity, a problem that could lead to a grievance. If the matter is not resolved by informal discussion, or a problem-solving meeting does not occur, it may be settled in accordance with the grievance procedure. Unless mutually agreed between the Employer and the Union problem-solving discussions shall not extend the deadlines for filing a grievance. The Union Xxxxxxx or in their absence, the Local Union President, or Area Xxxxxxx, or Chief Xxxxxxx, either with the employee or alone, shall present to the appropriate supervisor a written request for a meeting. If the supervisor agrees to a problem- solving meeting, this meeting shall be held within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the request. The supervisor, employee, Union Xxxxxxx, and up to one (1) other management person shall attempt to resolve the problem through direct and forthright communication. If another member of management is present that person will not be hearing the grievance at Step Two, should it progress to that Step. The employee, the Union Xxxxxxx or in their absence, the Local Union President, or Area Xxxxxxx, or Chief Xxxxxxx, may participate in problem-solving activities on paid time, in accordance with Article 31, Union Rights, Section 1H.

  • Scheduling Committee (a) The parties agree to the formation of a Scheduling Committee to discuss and assist in resolving scheduling issues.

  • Scheduling i) The designated employer will provide the employee with their schedule of shifts in accordance with the collective agreement for both homes. [Insert the split/sharing of shift numbers here] Similarly, the employee will submit all requests for time off including vacation to the designated employer in accordance with the collective agreement.

  • Self Scheduling The Home and the Union may agree to implement a self-scheduling process. Self-scheduling is the mechanism by which employees in a Home create their own work schedules. The purpose of self scheduling is to improve job satisfaction and quality of work life for the participating employees. Self scheduling requires a collaboration of employees and management to ensure proper coverage of the Home and to meet the provisions of the Collective Agreement. It is agreed that self scheduling will be negotiated locally by the Home and the Union and will include a trial period. Each Home must have the majority agreement of the full-time and part-time employees who vote on the issue to agree on a trial period of up to six months. Once the trial period is complete, each Home must have a minimum of 66⅔% agreement of the full-time and part-time employees who vote on the issue to continue with the new schedule on a permanent basis.

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CBB chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CBB’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CBB to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG.

  • Scheduling Objectives The following scheduling objectives contained in the Collective Agreement shall apply to all nurses working ten (10) hour tours as follows:

  • Problem/ Solution Statement Problem California’s forest health crisis is an emergency of unprecedented scope and scale, with disastrous implications for the state’s environment, economy, energy systems, and human life. Unlike essentially all other technologies and solutions proposed to respond to the crisis, gasification has the potential to process forest waste in a way that extracts value and sequesters a large portion of its carbon. Before the recipient’s development of the pre- commercial Powertainer technology, no one had developed gasification technology that could economically respond to the problem. As a result, there have not yet been any large-scale deployments of distributed, commercial-scale gasification technology. The acceleration of tree mortality and persistent drought conditions make finding solutions to this problem more critical with each passing day.

  • Scheduling Coordinator Buyer shall act as the Scheduling Coordinator for the Project. In that regard, Buyer and Seller shall agree to the following:

  • Scheduling Provisions The scheduling and premium provisions relating to consecutive weekends off in Article 16 do not apply to employees who accept positions under this provision.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.