Soil Samples Sample Clauses

Soil Samples. Procedures to be used for soil sampling are presented in:  Soil Sampling Quality Assurance User ’s Guide (USEPA, 1989).  Requirements for Subsurface Soil Investigations (RWQCB, 2000b). Soil borings should be logged for soil type according to the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM, 2006 ). Table 3-2 presents representative soi l sampling techniques.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Soil Samples. BSB agrees to use its’ best efforts to provide, upon Owner’s prior written request, a portion of any sample taken on Owner’s Property. A “SAMPLE REQUEST” form, attached as Exhibit 3 for Owner’s use to request a sample portion has been provided to Owner by BSB.
Soil Samples. Generally, a single application of KCl-treated water on the fields had no significant effect on extractable K+ in surface soil layers (Table 3). However, K+ concentration was significantly increased by 12 to 26% at three fields. For one of these fields (Site 2, Pipeline D), the significant increase occurred in the 0- to 2.5-cm layer but not in the 0- to 15-cm layer. For the other two fields (Site 4, Pipeline D; Site 6, Pipeline E), the significant increase occurred in the 0- to 15-cm layer, but not in the 0- to 2.5-cm layer, and this would not be expected. An increase in the 0- to 2.5-cm layer but not in the 0- to 15-cm layer can be expected, but not the opposite. The amount of K+ applied to the fields was generally less than what would be expected to be removed by crops typically grown in southern Alberta. Plus, the amount of K+ applied was small compared to the exiting K+ content in the soil. Of the 18 fields sampled, nine had significantly higher Cl- concentration in the 0- to 2.5-cm soil layer after the application of potash-treated water. This was also true for the 0- to 15-cm soil layer at five of the fields. Unlike K+, the amount of Cl- added was relatively large compared to the existing Cl- content in soil, and this resulted in the ability to detect significant increases. For most of the fields, the application of potash-treated water did not affect soil EC. Significant effects on EC did occur in six fields; however, the effect was not consistent, with EC increasing in three fields and decreasing in three fields. Therefore, the apparent significant effect on EC may be due to field variability. Plant Tissue Samples. There was no significant effect (P ≤0.05) caused by the application of KCl-treated water on the alfalfa crop at Site 3, Pipeline B (data not shown). The concern with the application of K+ to a crop used for livestock feed is the possibility of causing grass tetany (or hypomagnesemia), which is the result of low Mg content in blood. High levels of K+ in feed can reduce the absorption of Mg by cattle, and alfalfa can accumulate high levels of K+ (Xxxx 2004). The mean K:(Mg+Ca) ratio in the control and treatment alfalfa samples was 1.6 ± 0.2 and 1.8 ± 0.3, respectively. A feed ration should have a K:(Mg+Ca) ratio less than 2.2 (Xxxx 2004). Therefore, a one-time application of KCl-treated water did not affect the nutrient quality of the alfalfa crop under the conditions of this trial.
Soil Samples. The application of KCl-treated water in 2016 had minimal effect on the concentration of extractable K+ in soil. In the 0- to 2.5-cm layer, K+ concentration increased with K+ concentration in the irrigation water; however, the differences among the treatment means were not statistically significant (Table 5). In contrast, Cl- concentration was significantly increased in the top 2.5-cm layer with the 500T plots containing seven times more Cl- compared to the 0T plots. Significant effects for Cl- was also observed in the 0- to 15-cm and 15- to 30-cm layers, suggesting leaching of Cl-. The application of KCl-treated water also caused a significant increase in EC in the 0- to 2.5-cm and 0- to 15-cm soil layers in 2016.

Related to Soil Samples

  • Samples Physical examples of materials, equipment, or workmanship that are representative of some portion of the Work and that establish the standards by which such portion of the Work will be judged. The Contractor shall furnish for approval all samples required by the Contract Documents. The Work shall be in accordance with approved samples.

  • Biological Samples If so specified in the Protocol, Institution and Principal Investigator may collect and provide to Sponsor or its designee Biological Samples (“Biological Samples”). 12.2.

  • Test Samples The Contractor is responsible for providing Samples of sufficient size for test purposes and for coordinating such tests with the Work Progress Schedule to avoid delay.

  • SHOP DRAWINGS, PRODUCT DATA AND SAMPLES 4.12.1 Shop Drawings are drawings, diagrams, schedules and other, data specially prepared for the Work by the Contractor or any Subcontractor, manufacturer, supplier or distributor to illustrate some portion of the Work.

  • RE-WEIGHING PRODUCT Deliveries are subject to re- weighing at the point of destination by the Authorized User. If shrinkage occurs which exceeds that normally allowable in the trade, the Authorized User shall have the option to require delivery of the difference in quantity or to reduce the payment accordingly. Such option shall be exercised in writing by the Authorized User.

  • API If the Software offers integration capabilities via an API, your use of the API may be subject to additional costs or Sage specific policies and terms and conditions (which shall prevail in relation to your use of the API). You may not access or use the API in any way that could cause damage to us or the Software, or in contravention of any applicable laws. We reserve the right in our sole discretion, to: (i) update any API from time to time; (ii) place limitations around your use of any API; and (iii) deny you access to any API in the event of misuse by you or to otherwise protect our legitimate interests.

  • Standard Samples Bid Specifications may indicate that the Product to be purchased must be equal to a standard sample on display in a place designated by the Commissioner and such sample will be made available to the Bidder for examination prior to the opening date. Failure by the Bidder to examine such sample shall not entitle the Bidder to any relief from the conditions imposed by the Bid Specifications.

  • Product ACCEPTANCE Unless otherwise provided by mutual agreement of the Authorized User and the Contractor, Authorized User(s) shall have thirty (30) days from the date of delivery to accept hardware products and sixty (60) days from the date of delivery to accept all other Product. Where the Contractor is responsible for installation, acceptance shall be from completion of installation. Failure to provide notice of acceptance or rejection or a deficiency statement to the Contractor by the end of the period provided for under this clause constitutes acceptance by the Authorized User(s) as of the expiration of that period. The License Term shall be extended by the time periods allowed for trial use, testing and acceptance unless the Commissioner or Authorized User agrees to accept the Product at completion of trial use. Unless otherwise provided by mutual agreement of the Authorized User and the Contractor, Authorized User shall have the option to run testing on the Product prior to acceptance, such tests and data sets to be specified by User. Where using its own data or tests, Authorized User must have the tests or representative set of data available upon delivery. This demonstration will take the form of a documented installation test, capable of observation by the Authorized User, and shall be made part of the Contractor’s standard documentation. The test data shall remain accessible to the Authorized User after completion of the test. In the event that the documented installation test cannot be completed successfully within the specified acceptance period, and the Contractor or Product is responsible for the delay, Authorized User shall have the option to cancel the order in whole or in part, or to extend the testing period for an additional thirty (30) day increment. Authorized User shall notify Contractor of acceptance upon successful completion of the documented installation test. Such cancellation shall not give rise to any cause of action against the Authorized User for damages, loss of profits, expenses, or other remuneration of any kind. If the Authorized User elects to provide a deficiency statement specifying how the Product fails to meet the specifications within the testing period, Contractor shall have thirty (30) days to correct the deficiency, and the Authorized User shall have an additional sixty (60) days to evaluate the Product as provided herein. If the Product does not meet the specifications at the end of the extended testing period, Authorized User, upon prior written notice to Contractor, may then reject the Product and return all defective Product to Contractor, and Contractor shall refund any monies paid by the Authorized User to Contractor therefor. Costs and liabilities associated with a failure of the Product to perform in accordance with the functionality tests or product specifications during the acceptance period shall be borne fully by Contractor to the extent that said costs or liabilities shall not have been caused by negligent or willful acts or omissions of the Authorized User’s agents or employees. Said costs shall be limited to the amounts set forth in the Limitation of Liability Clause for any liability for costs incurred at the direction or recommendation of Contractor.

  • GARBAGE DISPOSAL, RECYCLING, AND BIODEGRADABLE MATERIALS A. Concessionaire shall be responsible for maintaining the cleanliness of the Concession Premises. Concessionaire shall ensure placement of all garbage and trash generated by the Concession Operation in designated containers and that said containers are emptied daily, or as more frequently required by Department, at a location within the Area designated by Department. Disposal costs from this latter location shall be borne by Department. Concessionaire shall provide such additional trash containers as may be required to keep the immediate Concession Premises clean at all times. The type of trash containers provided by Concessionaire shall be approved by Department prior to use.

  • First sampling In the first sampling four lamps are selected at random. The first sample of two is marked A, the second sample of two is marked B.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.