Specific Duties of a Participant When Submitting a Message Sample Clauses

Specific Duties of a Participant When Submitting a Message. Whenever a Participant or Participant User acts as a Submitter by submitting a Message to another Participant or Participant User, the Submitter shall be responsible for:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Specific Duties of a Participant When Submitting a Message. Whenever a Participant or Participant User acts as a Submitter by submitting a Message to another Participant or Participant User, the Submitter shall be responsible for: Submitting each Message in compliance with Applicable Law, this Agreement, the applicable Performance and Service Specifications, and Operating Policies and Procedures including, but not limited to, representing that the Message is: for a Permitted Purpose; submitted by a Submitter who has the requisite authority to make such a submission; supported by appropriate legal authority for Transacting the Message Content including, but not limited to, any consent or Authorization, if required by Applicable Law; and submitted to the intended Recipient. Representing that assertions or statements related to the submitted Message are true and accurate, if such assertions or statements are required by the Performance and Service Specifications or Operating Policies and Procedures; Submitting a copy of the AuthorizationProvide evidence that the Submitter has obtained an Authorization or other evidence of an individual directed transaction, if the Submitter is requesting Message Content from another Participant or Participant User based on the Permitted Purpose described in Sections 1(jjkk)(68) or (9). Nothing in this Section shall be interpreted as requiring a Submitter who is requesting Message Content to obtain or transmit an Authorization for a request based on a Permitted Purpose other than the one described in Section 1(jjkk)(69), even though certain other Participants or Participant Users require such Authorization to comply with Applicable Law. For Federal Participants only, in addition to complying with Sections 13.01 through 13.03, ensuring that Messages submitted by such Federal Participant adhere to interoperability standards adopted by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS), as applicable.
Specific Duties of a Participant When Submitting a Message. Whenever a Participant or Participant User acts as a Submitter by submitting a Message to the HIETexas, the Submitter shall be responsible for:

Related to Specific Duties of a Participant When Submitting a Message

  • Deadline for Submission of Bids 19.1 Bids must be received by the Purchaser at the address specified under ITB Clause 18.2 no later than the time and date specified in the Bid Data Sheet. 19.2 The Purchaser may, at its discretion, extend this deadline for the submission of bids by amending the bidding documents in accordance with ITB Clause 7, in which case all rights and obligations of the Purchaser and bidders previously subject to the deadline will thereafter be subject to the deadline as extended.

  • Method of Providing Communications to You in Electronic Form All Communications that we provide to you in electronic form will be provided either (1) via e-mail, (2) by access to a web site that we will designate in an e-mail notice we send to you at the time the information is available, (3) to the extent permissible by law, by access to a web site that we will generally designate in advance for such purpose, or (4) by requesting you download a PDF file containing the Communication.

  • SUBMISSION OF THE MONTHLY MI REPORT 4.1 The completed MI Report shall be completed electronically and returned to the Authority by uploading the electronic MI Report computer file to MISO in accordance with the instructions provided in MISO.

  • Sale of Note; Change of Loan Servicer; Notice of Grievance The Note or a partial interest in the Note (together with this Security Instrument) can be sold one or more times without prior notice to Borrower. A sale might result in a change in the entity (known as the “Loan Servicer”) that collects Periodic Payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument and performs other mortgage loan servicing obligations under the Note, this Security Instrument, and Applicable Law. There also might be one or more changes of the Loan Servicer unrelated to a sale of the Note. If there is a change of the Loan Servicer, Borrower will be given written notice of the change which will state the name and address of the new Loan Servicer, the address to which payments should be made and any other information RESPA requires in connection with a notice of transfer of servicing. If the Note is sold and thereafter the Loan is serviced by a Loan Servicer other than the purchaser of the Note, the mortgage loan servicing obligations to Borrower will remain with the Loan Servicer or be transferred to a successor Loan Servicer and are not assumed by the Note purchaser unless otherwise provided by the Note purchaser. Neither Borrower nor Lender may commence, join, or be joined to any judicial action (as either an individual litigant or the member of a class) that arises from the other party’s actions pursuant to this Security Instrument or that alleges that the other party has breached any provision of, or any duty owed by reason of, this Security Instrument, until such Borrower or Lender has notified the other party (with such notice given in compliance with the requirements of Section 15) of such alleged breach and afforded the other party hereto a reasonable period after the giving of such notice to take corrective action. If Applicable Law provides a time period which must elapse before certain action can be taken, that time period will be deemed to be reasonable for purposes of this paragraph. The notice of acceleration and opportunity to cure given to Borrower pursuant to Section 22 and the notice of acceleration given to Borrower pursuant to Section 18 shall be deemed to satisfy the notice and opportunity to take corrective action provisions of this Section 20.

  • Examination of an application for an industrial design 1. A formal examination of the application for an industrial design received by the federal executive authority for intellectual property is carried out which includes checks on presence of the documents specified in clause 2 of Article 1377 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and its compliance with the established requirements. If the result of the formal examination is positive, then a substantive examination of an application for an industrial design is carried out, which includes: information search in relation to the claimed industrial design to determine the publicly available information, which shall be taken into account when examining the design patentability; examination of the claimed industrial design for the compliance with the requirements under Article 1231.1, clause 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and the patentability criteria under the first paragraph of clause 1, clause 5 of Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation; examination of the claimed industrial design for the compliance with the patentability criteria under the second paragraph of clause 1 of Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. An information search in relation to the objects specified in sub-clause 4 of clause 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation shall not be carried out, and the federal executive authority on intellectual property notifies the applicant about it. 2. If, as a result of the substantive examination of an application for an industrial design, it is found that the claimed industrial design represented on the reproductions of an external appearance of the article does not relate to the objects specified in Article 1231.1 or clause 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and meets the patentability criteria under Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the federal executive authority for intellectual property makes a decision to grant a patent for an industrial design. The date of filing of the application for the industrial design and the priority date of the industrial design shall be specified in the decision. If, during the process of substantive examination of an application for an industrial design, it is found that the claimed object does not meet at least one of the requirements or patentability criteria specified in paragraph one of this clause, the federal executive authority for intellectual property makes a decision to refuse the issuance of a patent.

  • Medicaid Notification of Termination Requirements Party shall follow the Department of Vermont Health Access Managed-Care-Organization enrollee-notification requirements, to include the requirement that Party provide timely notice of any termination of its practice.

  • Timing of Messages With respect to GTE resold measured rate local service(s), chargeable time begins when a connection is established between the calling station and the called station. Chargeable time ends when the calling station "hangs up," thereby releasing the network connection. If the called station "hangs up" but the calling station does not, chargeable time ends when the network connection is released by automatic timing equipment in the network.

  • Doctor's Certificate of Inability to Work The Employer may require an employee who is unable to work because of illness or injury to provide a statement from:

  • HHS Single Audit Unit will notify Grantee to complete the Single Audit Determination Form If Grantee fails to complete the form within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of notice, Grantee maybe subject to sanctions and remedies for non-compliance.

  • Certification Regarding Termination of Contract for Non-Compliance (Tex Gov. Code 552.374)

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.