Split Decision Sample Clauses

Split Decision. If after a second vote, the selection committee does not have a majority decision, a second round of discussion and voting is in order. If the third ballot does not result in a majority decision, the chair shall draft a memo to the College President or appropriate Vice President, outlining the split decision and recommending a course of action. All selection committee delegates sign this memo, and the resumes and applications of all short- listed applicants are attached to it.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Split Decision. If after a second vote, the SC does not have a majority decision, a second round of discussion and voting is in order. If the third ballot does not in a majority decision, the Chair shall draft a the College President/appropriate Vice President, outlining the split decision, and recommending a course of action. All SC delegates sign this memo, and the resumes and applications short-listed applicants are attached to it. No Candidate Recommended. Procedure is the same as in above, but a recommendation from the SC for another posting (internal, external, or another course of action may be included in the memo. The memo is to be signed by all SC delegates, with the resumes and applications of all short-listed applicants attached. Procedural Guidelines for Selection Committees Adjournment. In some instances, especially a lengthy discussion process, the SC may suggest an adjournment. SC determines that it is necessary, the Chair shall adjourn the proceedings for not longer than hours. If a weekend is involved, then it would be the next working day in the following week. One or More Candidates. As an alternative to rendering a “split decision” above) or “no candidate selected” decision above), the committee may determine that one or more of the candidates should be If the SC so determines, the Chair shall arrange for the in the same manner as in above. At the the Chair shall explain the reason(s) for the to the candidate(s) and the interview process shall continue as in Section 8 above. The outcome of the shall follow the guidelines described in through above. Position In cases where the SC cannot select any applicant, and the individual responsible for the appointment the position, it is suggested that the same SC continue its function for the second applicants as this committee has already gained experience relative to the posting. There are three conditions for the continuance of the same SC. The individual responsible for the appointment wishes to continuewith the same SC; and The lapse between the recommendationand the posting does not exceed three months; and The SC members or their alternates wish to continue for the second round of interviews.
Split Decision. If after a second vote, the SC does not have a majority decision, a second round of discussion and voting is in order. If the third ballot does not result in a majority decision, the Chair shall draft a memo to the College President/Campus Principal, outlining the split decision, and recommending a course of action. All SC delegates sign this memo, and the resumes and applications of all short-listed applicants are attached to it. No Candidate Recommended. Procedure is the same as in above, but a recommendation from the SC for another posting (internal, external or both), or another course of action may be included in the memo. The memo is to be signed by all SC delegates, with the resumes and applications of all short-listed applicants attached.

Related to Split Decision

  • Shared Decision Making 33-1 Purpose The purpose of a shared decision making program is to create an atmosphere in which decision making is a collegial, shared, process that fosters an exchange of ideas and information necessary for effective professional practice and for improved student performance. The Association and District agree to continue pursuing jointly the implementation of legitimately recognized school councils as a foundation of a shared decision-making program. All provisions of this Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect throughout the process.

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Hearing Decision The decision of the Board shall be in writing and shall contain findings of fact and the personnel action approved, if any. The findings may reiterate the language of the pleadings or simply refer to them. The decision of the Board shall be certified to the Superintendent or designee who recommended the personnel action, and he/she shall enforce and follow this decision. A copy of the decision shall be delivered to the appellant or his/her designated representative personally or by registered mail. The decision of the Board shall be final.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Decision Making The JDC shall make decisions unanimously, with each Party’s representatives collectively having one (1) vote and at least one (1) representative from each Party participating in such decision. In the event the JDC determines that it cannot reach an agreement regarding a decision within the JDC’s authority, then, within *** Business Days after such determination: (a) for any matter that is not a Critical Issue *** shall have the final decision making authority on such matter; and (b) for any matter that is a Critical Issue, the matter shall be referred to FivePrime’s Chief Executive Officer (or designee) and HGS’ Chief Executive Officer (or designee) for resolution. If such executives cannot resolve the matter within *** Business Days, then the Chief Executive Officer of *** (or designee) shall have the final decision making authority on such matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Development Plan shall not be amended, without FivePrime’s prior written approval (which approval may be withheld in FivePrime’s sole discretion), to: (i) increase or materially change the nature of FivePrime-Conducted Trials or Other FivePrime-Conducted Activities; or (ii) require FivePrime to continue any FivePrime-Conducted Trial if FivePrime, in its reasonable judgment, decides not to continue such trial for any business, scientific, safety, efficacy, enrollment or ethical reason, provided that, in the event FivePrime so decides to discontinue such trial, HGS shall have no further obligation to reimburse FivePrime under Section 4.2(d) except with respect to costs *** INDICATES MATERIAL THAT WAS OMITTED AND FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT WAS REQUESTED. ALL SUCH OMITTED MATERIAL WAS FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. already incurred by FivePrime prior to such discontinuation and any and all standard close out costs incurred thereafter, and HGS shall have the right to continue such trial by itself at its expense. When *** make a final determination under this Section 3.4, that final determination must be consistent with the terms of this Agreement.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Arbitrator’s Decision 27.3.3.1 The arbitrator's decision and award shall be in writing and shall state concisely the reasons for the award, including the arbitrator's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

  • Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.