SPP Filing Sample Clauses

SPP Filing. On August 29, 2019, SPP submitted the AEP Agreement, which includes the revised, unexecuted NITSA and the executed Network Operating Agreement.7 SPP asserts that its proposed revisions to the AEP Agreement make a minor correction in section 4.0 of the NITSA and add a single delivery point in Appendix 3 of the NITSA. SPP states that the proposed revisions maintain conformity with SPP’s pro forma NITSA.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SPP Filing. 3. The Agreement comprises: (1) an executed NITSA between SPP as transmission provider and AEP, as agent for PSO and SWEPCO, as network customer; (2) an executed NOA among SPP as transmission provider; AEP, as agent for PSO and SWEPCO, as network customer; and AEP, as agent for PSO, SWEPCO, and AEP Texas North Company, as host transmission owner (AEP NOA); and (3) an unexecuted NOA among SPP as transmission provider; AEP, as agent for PSO and SWEPCO, as network customer; and Western Farmers as host transmission owner (Western Farmers NOA).
SPP Filing. SPP states that the NOA in the AEP Agreement conforms to the pro forma NOA contained in Attachment G of the SPP Tariff.7 With regard to the NITSA, SPP proposes revisions to sections 8.8 (Redispatch Charge) and 8.13 (Other Charges) in Attachment 1, Appendix 1 (Network Resources of AEP), as well as to Appendix 3 (Delivery Points of AEP).8 SPP also proposes deleting Attachment A (Redispatch Required for 4 Under Attachment Z2 of the SPP Open Access Transmission Tariff (Tariff), a Creditable Upgrade is “[a] Network Upgrade which was paid for, in whole or part, through revenues collected from a Transmission Customer, Network Customer, or Generation Interconnection Customer through Directly Assigned Upgrade Costs ” SPP Tariff, attach. Z2, § I.A. 5 Sw. Power Pool, Inc., 165 FERC ¶ 61,048 (2018) (October 2018 Order). 6 Sw. Power Pool, Inc., 168 FERC ¶ 61,145 (2019); Sw. Power Pool, Inc., 169 FERC ¶ 61,072 (2019); Sw. Power Pool, Inc., 171 FERC ¶ 61,086 (2020) (May 2020 Order). 7 Filing, SPP Transmittal at n.5. 8 In section 8.13 of Attachment 1 in the NITSA, SPP proposes to eliminate numerous Creditable Upgrades whose service has ended. Filing, Proposed AEP Agreement, NITSA, att. 1, § 8.13 (Other Charges). Transmission Service) of the NITSA. SPP asserts that the proposed revisions maintain conformity with SPP’s pro forma NITSA. SPP states that Attachment 1 in the NITSA retains non-conforming terms and conditions in sections 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, 8.1, 8.3, and 8.11 previously accepted by the Commission. SPP indicates that AEP declined to execute the AEP Agreement due to the disputed Creditable Upgrade charges pending in previous proceedings.9 SPP requests waiver of the Commission’s 60-day notice requirement10 to allow the AEP Agreement to become effective on August 1, 2020. SPP contends that waiver is appropriate because it filed the AEP Agreement within 30 days of the commencement of service.11
SPP Filing. On May 31, 2018, SPP submitted the AEP Agreement, which includes the revised, unexecuted NITSA and the executed Network Operating Agreement.19 SPP proposes 13 Sw. Power Pool, Inc., 161 FERC ¶ 61,144 (2017).

Related to SPP Filing

  • Filing Within thirty (30) calendar days following the Closing Date, the Company shall submit to or file with the Commission a Registration Statement for a Shelf Registration on Form S-1 (the “Form S-1 Shelf”) or a Registration Statement for a Shelf Registration on Form S-3 (the “Form S-3 Shelf”), if the Company is then eligible to use a Form S-3 Shelf, in each case, covering the resale of all the Registrable Securities (determined as of two (2) business days prior to such submission or filing) on a delayed or continuous basis and shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to have such Shelf declared effective as soon as practicable after the filing thereof, but no later than the earlier of (a) the ninetieth (90th) calendar day following the filing date thereof if the Commission notifies the Company that it will “review” the Registration Statement and (b) the tenth (10th) business day after the date the Company is notified (orally or in writing, whichever is earlier) by the Commission that the Registration Statement will not be “reviewed” or will not be subject to further review. Such Shelf shall provide for the resale of the Registrable Securities included therein pursuant to any method or combination of methods legally available to, and requested by, any Holder named therein. The Company shall maintain a Shelf in accordance with the terms hereof, and shall prepare and file with the Commission such amendments, including post-effective amendments, and supplements as may be necessary to keep a Shelf continuously effective, available for use to permit the Holders named therein to sell their Registrable Securities included therein and in compliance with the provisions of the Securities Act until such time as there are no longer any Registrable Securities. In the event the Company files a Form S-1 Shelf, the Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to convert the Form S-1 Shelf (and any Subsequent Shelf Registration Statement) to a Form S-3 Shelf as soon as practicable after the Company is eligible to use Form S-3. The Company’s obligation under this Section 2.1.1, shall, for the avoidance of doubt, be subject to Section 3.4.

  • DES Filing Requirement Under RCW 39.26, sole source contracts and amendments must be filed with the State of Washington Department of Enterprise Services (DES). If this Contract is one that must be filed, it shall not be effective nor shall work commence or payment be made until the tenth (10th) working day following the date of filing subject to DES approval. In the event DES fails to approve the Contract or any amendment hereto, the Contract or amendment shall be null and void.

  • REPORT SUBMISSION 1. Copies of reporting packages for audits conducted in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F-Audit Requirements, and required by PART I of this form shall be submitted, when required by 2 CFR 200.512, by or on behalf of the recipient directly to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) as provided in 2 CFR 200.36 and 200.512

  • LITIGATION STATEMENT CHECK ONE [ ] The undersigned bidder has had no litigation and/or judgments entered against it by any local, state or federal entity and has had no litigation and/or judgments entered against such entities during the past ten (10) years. [ ] The undersigned bidder, BY ATTACHMENT TO THIS FORM, submits a summary and disposition of individual cases of litigation and/or judgments entered by or against any local, state or federal entity, by any state or federal court, during the past ten (10) years. COMPANY NAME AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) TITLE Failure to check the appropriate blocks above may result in disqualification of your bid. Likewise, failure to provide documentation of a possible conflict of interest, or a summary of past litigation and/or judgments, may result in disqualification of your bid. E VERIFICATION CERTIFICATION Contract No.Y20-1058-MV I hereby certify that I will utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s E-Verify system in accordance with the terms governing the use of the system to confirm the employment eligibility of the individuals classified below. In accordance with s. 837.06, Florida Statutes, I understand and acknowledge that whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his or her official duties shall be guilty of a misdemeanor in the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, Florida statutes. All persons, including subcontractors and their workforce, who will perform work under Contract No.Y20-1058-MV, Heavy Equipment Parts and Labor, within the state of Florida. NAME OF CONTRACTOR: ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: DATE: RELATIONSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM FOR USE WITH PROCUREMENT ITEMS, EXCEPT THOSE WHERE THE COUNTY IS THE PRINCIPAL OR PRIMARY BIDDER For procurement items that will come before the Board of County Commissioners for final approval, this form shall be completed by the Bidder and shall be submitted to the Procurement Division by the Bidder. In the event any information provided on this form should change, the Bidder must file an amended form on or before the date the item is considered by the appropriate board or body. Part I INFORMATION ON BIDDER: Legal Name of Bidder: Business Address (Street/P.O. Box, City and Zip Code): Business Phone: ( ) Facsimile: ( ) INFORMATION ON XXXXXX’S AUTHORIZED AGENT, IF APPLICABLE: (Agent Authorization Form also required to be attached) Name of Bidder’s Authorized Agent: Business Address (Street/P.O. Box, City and Zip Code): Business Phone: ( ) Facsimile: ( ) Part II IS THE BIDDER A RELATIVE OF THE MAYOR OR ANY MEMBER OF THE BCC? YES NO IS THE MAYOR OR ANY MEMBER OF THE BCC THE BIDDER’S EMPLOYEE? YES NO IS THE BIDDER OR ANY PERSON WITH A DIRECT BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME OF THIS MATTER A BUSINESS ASSOCIATE OF THE MAYOR OR ANY MEMBER OF THE BCC? YES NO If you responded “YES” to any of the above questions, please state with whom and explain the relationship. (Use additional sheets of paper if necessary) Part III

  • SEC The term “SEC” or “Commission” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

  • Accurate and Timely Submission of Reports a) The reports and administrative fees shall be accurate and timely and submitted in accordance with the due dates specified in this section. Vendor shall correct any inaccurate reports or administrative fee payments within three (3) business days upon written notification by DIR. Vendor shall deliver any late reports or late administrative fee payments within three (3) business days upon written notification by DIR. If Vendor is unable to correct inaccurate reports or administrative fee payments or deliver late reports and fee payments within three

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.