Statement of Dispute. Employee’s Name Department Employee’s Address Person Making Assignment Date Assignment Made Beginning Date of Assignment Employee’s Signature UFF Representative’s Signature Date Filed Date of Meeting
Statement of Dispute. Fax : 00- 0000 0000 Email: xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx Section B: Disputed Transaction (for card related dispute only. Please continue on blank sheet if more than 3 transactions) I have examined the charge(s) made to my account and I wish to dispute the transaction(s) listed below:-
Statement of Dispute. 2.1 The First Parties and the Second Parties agree that Oak Ridge and Global entered into a Letter Agreement as of December 2, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference (the "Global Letter Agreement"), and pursuant to which Oak Ridge agreed to offer in Germany and Global agreed to sell in Germany certain $1.25 units of Oak Ridge comprised of one fully-paid share of common stock of Oak Ridge and one $1.25 one year warrant to acquire an addition share of common stock of Oak Ridge (the "Units"). These parties also agree that the Units, the common stock and the warrants of Oak Ridge were all "restricted securities" as that term is defined under Rule 144 of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and that no public sale of the common stock included in the Units can be made until the expiration of one year from the date of payment of the respective Units offered and sold, and that one year must elapse from the payment of the exercise price of the warrants prior to any public sale of the common stock issuable on the exercise of the warrants.
2.2 The First Parties and the Second Parties also agree that Global, though representations of its legal counsel, Fabian A. Krauxx, Xxx., xxx xx the form correspondence from Mr. Krause intxxxxx xx xperate as a legal opinion, represented to Oak Ridge that (i) Global was fully and lawfully authorized to offer and sell the Units in Germany; and (ii) that no prior or subsequent governmental filings of any kind were required in Germany of Oak Ridge or Global to effect the offer and sale of the Units in Germany.
2.3 The First Parties and the Second Parties further agree that to the date of this Agreement, Global has wired or caused to be wired to the bank account of Oak Ridge the aggregate sum of $1,018,575.07 for the purchase of 814,860 of the Units of Oak Ridge offered and sold by Global under the Global Letter Agreement from the at the times, in the amounts and from the persons listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
2.4 The First Parties and the Second Parties additionally agree that the Subscription Agreements tendered by Oak Ridge Europa for the purchase of 360,000 the Units outlined in Section 2.3 hereof, along with the $450,000 in wired funds through Global or otherwise for the payment of such Units, were changed by the Second Parties to be a Subscription Agreement and payment of 360,000 Units to be issued in the name of Global....
Statement of Dispute. On June 9, 2015, Xx. Xxxxxx filed a complaint against Defendants Duke University and Duke University Health System (“Duke Defendants”), alleging that the Duke Defendants, on the one hand, and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, the University of North Carolina Health Care System, and Xx. Xxxxxxx X. Roper, on the other hand, agreed not to hire each other’s skilled medical workers (except when a lateral hire would include a promotion, such as hiring an assistant professor into an associate professor position) (the “No-Hire Agreement”). (Dkt.
1.) Xx. Xxxxxx alleged that the No-Hire Agreement violates Section 1 of the Xxxxxxx Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and North Carolina General Statutes Sections 75-1 and 75-2, and sought injunctive and 1345943. 41 monetary relief for herself and for a proposed class. Xx. Xxxxxx identified Xx. Xxxxx, the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, and the University of North Carolina Health Care System as co-conspirators, but not as Defendants. (Dkt. 1 at ¶¶ 15-16.)
Statement of Dispute. The Trustees assert that a final judgment should be entered declaring Florida State Drilling Lease 224-A, as modified; Florida State Drilling Lease 224-B, as modified, and Florida State Drilling Lease 248, as modified, hereinafter referred to as The Leases, each of which leases is between the Trustees and Coastal and dated February 27, 1947, invalid and void. An appeal has been filed in the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals by the Trustees in the case styled Coastal Petroleum Company, a Florida Corporation, Petitioner-Appellee, vs. Secretary of the Army of the United States of America, et al., No. 712589, asserting such claim. Coastal denies the invalidity and/or voidness of the said leases and asks and asserts that the appeal should be denied. The parties desire to reach a full and final compromise and settlement of all matters and all causes of action arising out of the facts and claims as set forth above. SECTION THREE
Statement of Dispute. Within thirty (30) days after the termination of informal dispute resolution, or within ten (10) days after such termination in the event of exigent circumstances, the disputing Party shall submit to the DRP a written statement of dispute setting forth the nature of the dispute, the disputing Party's position, and all facts, including documents that support the disputing Party's contentions. The statement of dispute may include any technical, legal or factual information the disputing Party is relying upon to support its position. This statement of dispute shall be provided to the other Party who, at its discretion, may provide within ten (10) days thereafter any additional information in response to the statement of dispute.
Statement of Dispute. A written description of a dispute regarding a Claim required to be submitted as part of the Claims Dispute Resolution Process provided for in Article 9 of this Agreement.
Statement of Dispute. On or about June 12, 2001, Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit styled "Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xx. and Xxxxxx X.
Statement of Dispute. Employee's NameDepartment Employee's AddressPersonMaking Assignment Date Assignment MadeBeginning Date of Assignment I believe the assignment violates the CBA because:
Statement of Dispute. Pursuant to a share exchange agreement amongst First Deltavision, Kyomedix Corp. and all of its shareholders dated April 9, 2002 (the "Share Exchange Agreement"), First Deltavision purchased all issued and outstanding shares of Kyomedix stock, which purchase was effected by the issuance of 15,166,550 restricted common shares of First Deltavision to the Kyomedix shareholders on a share-for-share basis, thus affecting a "reverse merger," rendering Kyomedix a company whose stock was publicly traded and transferring control of the surviving entity to the principles of Kyomedix.
