Statistical Procedure Sample Clauses

Statistical Procedure. 3.1.1. For the CO2 emissions and electric energy consumption from the 4 phases of a WLTP test: For the total number of N tests and the measurement results of the tested vehicles, x1, x2 «N, th[e average Xtests and the standard deviation s shall be determined: ܺ ൌ ሺ୶భା୶మା୶యାڮା୶ొሻ ௧௘௦௧௦ ୒ and ሺݔଵെܺ ሻଶ൅ሺݔ െܺ ሻଶ൅ Ǥ൅ሺݔ െܺ ሻଶ ݏൌඨ ௧௘௦௧௦ ଶ ௧௘௦௧௦ ܰെͳ ே ௧௘௦௧௦
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Statistical Procedure. We estimate the effect of spousal retirement on individual health using a standard fixed effects regression, with Yit = β Xit + vt + ui + εit , where Yit is a dependent variable of interest, measured with Mobility index, ADL index, CESD score, and self-accessed health outcomes, representing the health condition of respondents in wave i at time t; Xit represents the independent variables; vt represents time fixed effects; ui represents personal fixed effects and εit represents the residual. The previous model estimates the association between spouses being fully retired and health outcomes of respondents. However, the association could be interpreted in the opposite direction of the intended topic of the current study – namely poor health conditions of the respondents might affect spouses’ retirement decisions. Intuitively if the respondent is in poor health condition, his or her spouse may decide to work longer for the additional income or the spouse may choose to retire earlier to have more time to take care of the respondent. In fact, several studies focusing on retirees’ health conditions have found that poor health – both physical health problems and psychiatric disorders - motivates individuals to retire earlier (Xxxxx & Xxxxxxxx, 1999; XxXxxxx, 2014; Ettner et al. 1997). Moreover, Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxx (2001), analyzing the patterns of joint labor supply behavior, found that both men and women were less likely to retire if their spouses appeared to have left the labor force because of health problems. To address this reverse causality issue, we drop respondents who report being diagnosed with one of the following illnesses prior to their spouses’ retirement: high blood pressure, diabetes, cancer, chronic lung disease, heart disease, stroke, arthritis, and psychiatric problems before their spouses retired are excluded from the sample. This reduces the sample to 67,741 person-wave observations after excluding these respondents. The means of both personal and panel variables in this subsample are presented in Table 4 and Table 5. The change in the financial structure after retirement obviously would have different impact on families with different levels of income. Hence in the previous models, total household income is used as a control variable, which means that it is kept constant when analyzing the effect of spouses’ retirement on respondents’ health outcomes. Nevertheless, as mentioned in the introduction section above, changes in household income ...
Statistical Procedure 

Related to Statistical Procedure

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • Statistical Sampling Documentation a. A copy of the printout of the random numbers generated by the “Random Numbers” function of the statistical sampling software used by the IRO.

  • Statistical Information Any third-party statistical and market-related data included in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package and the Prospectus are based on or derived from sources that the Company believes to be reliable and accurate in all material respects.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement to provide specificity to the statutory obligations established under sections 3319.111 and 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code and to conform to the framework for the evaluation of teachers developed under section 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Student Evaluation A. All unit members shall be subject to student evaluations each semester in each course taught.

  • Evaluation Procedures 7.2.1 Evaluation procedures designed to fairly and adequately assess performance of full- time faculty employees shall be established and reviewed annually by the Vice President, after consultation with appropriate faculty groups at divisional/departmental meetings for their recommendations.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Evaluation Report 20.5.4.1 The summary evaluation report shall be prepared by the Faculty Evaluation Committee and administrative evaluator(s) and shall include each evaluator’s individual rating. The summary evaluation report shall take into account the results of each of the evaluation components (Section 20.5.3) in order to arrive at an overall rating. When the committee and the administrative evaluator(s) cannot reach an agreement as to the overall rating, the report must include written explanation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.