Table 5. FSR Submission Schedule
Table 5. Top Five Government or Education Customers Line Item 22. Provide a list of your top five government, education, or non-profit customers (entity name is optional), including entity type, the state or province the entity is located in, scope of the project(s), size of transaction(s), and dollar volumes from the past three years. Entity Name Entity Type * State / Province * Scope of Work * Size of Transactions * Dollar Volume Past Three Years *
Table 5. Core HIA Process: Boundaries and Interfaces with Councils Activity Shared Service Councils
Examples of Table 5 in a sentence
The government has established institutional mechanisms for the enforcement of laws and regulations on child labor (Table 5).
The Government has established institutional mechanisms for the enforcement of laws and regulations on child labor, including its worst forms (Table 5).
Subscription Services are provided for Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization only when used for its supported Use Case in accordance with the terms of this Exhibit and Table 5 below.
Growth Drivers In a CapsuleRise in Cancer Incidences & Access to Modern Therapeutics Foster Growth Demographics & Lifestyles Raise the Risk of CancerCancer Prone Sites based on Age Table 5.
Table 5: Staff opinion survey Percentage of school staff who agree# that:Percentage of school staff who agree# that:* Nationally agreed student and parent/caregiver items.# ‘Agree’ represents the percentage of respondents who Somewhat Agree, Agree or Strongly Agree with the statement.
More Definitions of Table 5
Table 5. Wilcoxon Rank Test and Sign Test. Wilcoxon Rank Test Sign Test ORS Element Wilcoxon p-value Ho: p value observed ≤ interview Ho: p value collected ≥ interview Crawling 1.00 0.66 0.66 Crouching 0.86 0.50 0.59 Kneeling 0.08 0.97 0.05 Stooping <.01 <.01 1.00 Reaching overhead 0.57 0.81 0.25 Reaching At/Below Shoulder Level <.01 <.01 1.00 Communicating Verbally 0.07 0.95 0.07 Keyboarding 0.78 0.68 0.44 Keyboarding- Touchscreen 0.56 0.35 0.79 Keyboarding- 10key 0.41 0.29 0.87 Keyboarding- Other 0.01 <.01 1.00 Fine Manipulation <.01 <.01 1.00 Gross Manipulation <.01 <.01 1.00 Pushing/Pulling with Hands and Arms <.01 <.01 1.00 Pushing/Pulling with Feet and Legs 0.21 0.22 0.84 Pushing/Pulling with Feet 0.02 0.02 1.00 Climbing Ramps/Stairs 0.07 0.98 0.05 Climbing Ladders/Ropes/Scaffolding 0.14 0.96 0.21 The variables with longer duration associated with observation are stooping, reaching at or below the shoulder, other keyboarding, fine manipulation, gross manipulation, pushing and/or pulling with hands and arms, and pushing and pulling with feet. When we measure the modes of these elements, only one shows a difference in mode between the collected and observed values – reaching at or below the shoulder. The value of the mode for this element is occasionally (2% up to one-third of the day) in the interview data and constantly in the job observation data (two- thirds or more of the day). We noted earlier that missing duration was identified as an issue with ORS pre-production. In the case of reaching at or below the shoulder, 53 of the job observation duration measures were unable to be compared with interview duration data due to missing duration. It is notable that among the 53 missing quotes in pre-production, the job observation test recorded durations of frequently or constantly in 64% of the quotes. This is a common pattern among those elements where the sign test rejected the null of observation duration equal or below pre-production – the missing data in pre-production align with observed durations above the median and mode. From this, it appears that the “underestimate” of duration from the interview data is due to the missing duration being more likely to correlate with long duration observed. As a counter-example, 46 observed quotes had reaching overhead categorized as present with unknown duration in pre-production and only one of these was classified as frequently or constantly in the observation test.
Table 5. The energy supply of Orkney Supply Capacity/ quantity Production Notes Wind onshore 48.3 MW 149.7 GWh [18], EnergyPLAN [1] PV 1.3 MW 1.2 GWh [18], [22] Transmission line / Import 40 MW 10.8 GWh [1], [18] Solar (thermal) collectors 150 m2 0.05 GWh Estimation, [10] Biomass > 500 t 2.0 GWh Estimation, [18] Oil (for heating and transport) > 48 kt 598.8 GWh EnergyPLAN output Natural Gas > 7 kt 71.5 GWh EnergyPLAN output Coal > 3 kt 21.1 GWh [18], [21] As presented in Table 5, the total share of renewable sources in the primary energy supply reaches 17%. While the wind power production is good on Orkney, the transport and heating sector still rely on other fuels, such as oils. For the hourly simulation in EnergyPLAN, the wind and solar productions are specified by their distribution profiles throughout the whole year with a one hour temporal resolution – here the reference year 2014. The following figures present these distribution profiles for wind power, PV power and solar thermal production. Since no measured production data is available, the distribution of the electricity production from wind and PV is modelled with a renewable energy simulation website [7], [8], resulting in Figure 12 and Figure 13. For the profile of wind power production, the turbine type Enercon E44 is used for modelling, as it is also a type common on Orkney. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 12: Wind energy production simulation for 2014 for Orkney [8] Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Table 5. 3rd Person Object Markers in Chaha (light form; Banksira 2000:262) Accusative Dative/Benefactive Malefactive/ Locative/Instrumental 3msg -n-U14 -x-xX -x-xX 0xxx -x-x -x-x -β-a 3mpl -n-o -r-o -β-o 3fpl -n-əma -r-əma -β-əma Future work: further investigating his hypothesis, ramifications for morphosyntax of object marking in Amharic The agreement prefix in Amharic imperatives “disappears.” • This is due to haplology: the 2nd person Imp and the 2nd person agr prefix are adjacent (evidence: intervention effects, polite imperatives, independently attested haplology) • The haplology operation that deletes the prefix must occur before Vocabulary Insertion (evidence from allomorphy that is sensitive to absence of an agr prefix) • This provides support for the Metathesis analysis of discontinuous agreement (Xxxxxx 2020) 14 The capital U represents a labialization feature. See Banksira 2000:262, fn.1 • There are also some interesting (currently being explored!) ramifications for how haplology operations are stated and potentially also for the analysis of object markers in Amharic • Understanding PF and discontinuous agreement: nature of haplology operations at PF, timing of operations at PF, the creation of discontinuous agreement • Understanding imperatives: fleshing out intuitions about the connection between imperatives (inherently-person-marked) and lack of verbal person-marking (van der Wurff 2007:42) o Augmenting the modest literature on the morphology of imperatives (see e.g., Xxxxxx 1998, Xxxxxx 2016) • A pathway to analyzing similar phenomena in other languages? o Modern Standard Arabic: Soltan 2007 (syntactic approach) o Hebrew: Bat-El 2002 (phonological approach), Xxxxx and Berrebi to appear
Table 5. A typology of ditransitive person restrictions Syntactic No syntactic Morphological Strong PCC Kipsigis No morphological Weak PCC, Strong PCC No PCC Table 5 outlines a typology, showing how these syntactic and morphological restric- tions interact to derive some attested PCC patterns. If restrictions on similarity (i.e. *local > local, *3 > 3) can be attributed to the morphology, a division of labor between syntax and morphology could simplify the analyses in both modules (Xxxxx et al. 2020). The Weak PCC, which only rules out 3 > local configurations, is purely syntactic—derived via rela- tivized probing.29 By contrast, the Kipsigis pattern forbidding local > local combinations is morphological—resulting from conditions like (56). No PCC effects arise when neither type of restriction is active in a language. Finally, there are two versions of this typology for de- riving the Strong PCC. The strict version holds that all instances of the Strong PCC result from the co-occurrence of syntactic and morphological restrictions, as this pattern encom- passes *3 > local and *local > local. Different restrictions within the Strong PCC pattern, then, warrant different analyses; *3 > local is due to a syntactic restriction, while *local > local is morphological. The weak version allows for two possible derivations of the Strong PCC—one that is hybrid morphosyntactic and another that is purely syntactic. These differ- ent derivations have unique hallmarks, making the two patterns empirically distinguishable. I do not pick between the strict and weak versions of this typology here. However, pre- liminary evidence for a hybrid approach to the Strong PCC comes from French inherent da- tive constructions. Here the clitic combination me lui is acceptable because both elements bear inherent dative case (66a), even though this same cluster is ungrammatical in PCC con- figurations. By contrast, me te remains ungrammatical in inherent datives (66b), which indi- xxxxx that some other mechanism must be responsible for this restriction.
Table 5. AMS entitlement across developed and developing members Members Million US$ % share in global entitlement
Table 5. Amounts GMCB Billed OneCare in Fiscal Years 2019 and 2020 The known financial aspects of the Model to date indicate that OneCare’s operating costs have greatly exceeded any savings achieved by the ACO. Table 6: Recommendations and Related Issues
Table 5. Banking sector deposits and financing as at June 30, 2018 (SAR bln)