Household Income. (__) Less than $15K (__) $15,001 to $25,000 (__) $25,001 to $50,000 (__) $50,001 to $100,000 (__) $100,001 to $150,000 (__) $150,001 to $199,999 (__) $200,000 to $300,000 (__) More than $300,000
Household Income. Household income" means all income received by all persons of a household, as defined for income tax purposes, in a calendar year while members of the household. [PL 1973, c. 793, §12 (NEW).]
Household Income. Surprisingly, the ANOVA test was not able to detect significant differences between the income groups for any of the factors. Figure 11 shows the attitude factors by income groups. F17‐ Efficiency and Technology F16‐ Mobility for non‐Drivers F15‐ Automation F14‐ Driving Assistance and Safety F13‐ Travel Cost F12‐ Ownership Cost F11‐ Green Travel Pattern F10‐ Utility of Private Vehicle F9‐ Stress Relief and Cost‐Effectiveness F8‐ Travel Time F7‐ System Reliability F6‐ On‐Demand Service F5‐ Trust and Data Privacy Issue F4‐ Joy of Driving F3‐ Travel with Strangers F2‐ Choice Reasoning F1‐ Technology ‐0.60 ‐0.40 ‐0.20 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 HH Income 0‐49,999 HH Income 50‐99,999 HH Income 100‐149,999 HH Income 150,000 and above HH Size 1.0 HH Size 2.0 HH Size 3.0 HH Size 4.0 HH Size 5.0 HH Size 6 and above 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 ‐0.50 ‐1.00 F17‐ Efficiency and Technology F16‐ Mobility for non‐Drivers F15‐ Automation F14‐ Driving Assistance and Safety F13‐ Travel Cost F12‐ Ownership Cost F11‐ Green Travel Pattern F10‐ Utility of Private Vehicle F9‐ Stress Relief and Cost‐Effectiveness F8‐ Travel Time F7‐ System Reliability F6‐ On‐Demand Service F5‐ Trust and Data Privacy Issue F4‐ Joy of Driving F3‐ Travel with Strangers F2‐ Choice Reasoning F1‐ Technology Figure 11 Attitudes by household income level. Figure 12 Attitudes by household size.
Household Income. At the time of execution of the Affordable Homeownership Program contract, the Borrower’s family income does not exceed eighty percent (80.0%) of the median family income based upon family size, for Champaign County, Illinois as determined by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Household Income. (__) Less than $15K (__) $15,001 to $25,000 (__) $25,001 to $50,000 (__) $50,001 to $100,000 (__) $100,001 to $150,000 (__) $150,001 to $199,999 Subscription Agreement • Regulation A • San Xxxxxx Resort, LLC (__) $200,000 to $300,000 (__) More than $300,000
Household Income. Assistance will only be provided for families whose household income meets the eligibility criteria of being at or below 50% of the HUD area median income levels. The majority of the households currently served by Center of Hope are living on even lower incomes, often at 30% or less of the HUD area median income levels. Current income levels are determined from review of current check stubs, contacting current and past employers, verifying income from SRS records, verifying income from Unemployment Income resources, verifying income sources furnished to property owners/managers on the rental application, and by reviewing current expenses and past payment history to ensure current income is reasonable and properly provided.
Household Income. At rounds 2 and 3 (but not round 1), participants reported household composition (i.e. people sleeping and eating on a regular basis in the house). Monthly incomes (in Ethiopian Birr) from all income-generating members of the household were also collected at rounds 2 and 3, and the incomes of all income- generators were added to calculate a total household income. This total was then divided by the total number of people in the household (adults and children) to yield a monthly 15 I invested research funds in having two data collectors conduct each survey together, and in training the data collectors to 1) be friendly to each other and to the respondent (making the respondent more comfortable); 2) keep an eye on each others' questioning and data recording; and 3) share the questioning and data recording within each survey interview (to avoid tedium). My reasoning was that this investment would pay off in terms of data quality and in keeping both the data collectors and the respondents engaged and upbeat. I was also fortunate to have generally friendly, engaged and upbeat data collectors. household per capita income (Birr/month). At all rounds, participants also estimated an overall household income; at rounds 2 and 3, this was done prior to itemizing income by household member. On average, when participants itemized household income by member, total household income was about 15% greater than when participants estimated an overall household income. Since member-itemized household income was not reported at round 1, we adjusted round 1 incomes by adding 10% (a more conservative adjustment) to the reported value. Household composition was not reported at Round 1, so we assumed that it had not changed from round 1 to round 2. Therefore we divided the adjusted total monthly household income (in Birr) reported at round 1 by the total number of people in the household at round 2 to yield a monthly household per capita income for round 1. Finally, we categorized monthly per capita incomes at all three rounds according to USD/day, after dividing the raw data by 10 (1 USD was about 10 Birr during the study period) and then by 30 (the number of days in a month). Organizational food support. At each round, respondents reported whether they were receiving food aid from governmental or non-governmental organizations, and what kinds of foods they were receiving as food aid. Since wheat grain or flour is the most common type of food available and accessed in large quanti...
Household Income. At the beginning of the project, average annual household income was $107 within the project sphere of influence. At the end of the project it was estimated to be $162, (we measured income for the previous six months prior to the end of project survey to be $81). This increase is very significant, indeed an average increase of more than 50%. Having that kind of increase over two years is a result of the sum of the positive impacts the various project activities had on household revenue and range from having seed to plant when there was little or none before, having more tools, the ability to expand land and yields, crop diversification and the reduction of barriers on market access roads. We present in the following table another way to look at revenue at the beginning and at the end of the project, comparisons of average monthly income by axis which is more reflective of the relative level of effort made on each axis as well as the complicated factors that conflict still has on household revenue. Table 45: Average monthly revenue before and after the project Bandundu Equateur Kikwit-Idiofa Mbandaka-Bikoro Mbandaka- Ngombe - Bobangi Gemena-Akula Before After Before After Before After Before After 3.00 9.83 5.83 19.16 23.08 19.00 12.50 4.08 Along the Kikwit-Idiofa and Mbandaka-Bikoro axes, we see a tripling of monthly income. A 300% increase in income is highly significant and demonstrates just how far livelihood improvement can go in a short period of time despite the all the externalities and constraints found in the DRC. However, along the Gemena-Akula axis we see a major reduction in household income. IRM and the CLIFS project did not have many activities along this axis, mainly community seed production. This axis also has a significant number of fighters belonging to various factions still in conflict. The principal road linking these two market towns has also been degrading rapidly during the life of the project due to the lack of interest on the part of the government to invest in its rehabilitation, thus reducing severely the ability of farmers to sell their agricultural products. Along the Mbandaka-Ngombe-Bobangi axis we also see a reduction in household revenue for families that rely mainly on fishing. Unsustainable fishing practices have reduced the biodiversity and the overall stocks of fish species along the Congo River and its tributaries and this trend can only be slowed down over a longer period of time than what was allotted to the CLIFS p...
Household Income. Complete this PART and PART 5 1. List the income of the participant, and if residing with the participant, their spouse, and any dependents of the adult participant who reside with them. 2. Write the amount of income (the amount before taxes or anything else is taken out), the frequency of income (i.e. weekly, every two weeks, twice a month, or monthly) received last month for each person listed and where it came from, such as earnings, welfare, pensions and other income (refer to examples below for types of income to report). If any amount last month was less than usual, write the person’s usual income. 3. An adult household member must sign this income eligibility statement and give the last four digits of his/her security number in PART 5.
Household Income. IMPORTANT – Please read before completing the income declaration. Please give details of your gross (before deductions of tax and National Insurance) household income during the financial year (6 April 2018 to 5 April 2019). All the boxes in this section must be filled in. If you have no income in a particular category or categories, please write ‘NIL’ in the box. If your total income is NIL, you’ll need to provide an explanation of how you are supporting yourself. If a member of your family supported you during this period please include a letter from them to confirm this and evidence to demonstrate how this support was provided to you. We will not be able to accept applications without verifiable evidence from a reputable source. You must enclose evidence for all of the categories where you have declared an income. The income figure that you declare in the table below must match the income evidence that you supply.
