Superior Court. The Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco.
Superior Court. The Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.
Superior Court. Appeals (preparation and appearance):
Superior Court. Any employee who is required to attend trial preparation authorized by the Chief of Police at a time when the Officer is normally off duty, shall receive pay at the overtime rate of not less than four (4) hours for trial preparation within twenty
Superior Court. On the question of the arbitrator's jurisdiction Xxxxxx X., after recalling the principles set out by the Supreme Court in St. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Pulp & Paper, supra, and listing the provisions of the collective agreement in effect between the parties and applicable to the complainants, held that: [TRANSLATION] In deciding to hear the grievance, the respondent arbitrator applied what I would call the presumption that a grievance is arbitrable when, as here, everything tends to show that the individual contract of the parties is clearly subject to the provisions of the collective agreement and therefore to the arbitration mechanisms provided for therein. However, Xxxxxx X. accepted the respondent's alternative argument. Referring to the arbitral award, he noted that the arbitrator had confined his ruling to the contractual relationship between the respondent and the mis en cause employees in deciding on the merits of the grievance and had refused to hear the evidence that the reason the respondent lacked funds was precisely the poor quality of the work done by the mis en cause employees. Accordingly, he was of the view that: [TRANSLATION] On the one hand, by blaming [the respondent] for not establishing that the cause of dismissal was something for which the mis en cause employees were responsible, and on the other, by denying [the respondent] the opportunity to establish that very fact based on a narrow interpretation of the "cause" of dismissal, the [mis en cause] arbitrator was refusing to hear admissible and relevant evidence . . . . Relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Roberval Express Ltée v. Transport Drivers, Warehousemen and General Workers Union, Local 106, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 888, the judge concluded that the arbitrator had exceeded his jurisdiction by refusing to hear relevant and admissible evidence. Court of Appeal, [1990] R.J.Q. 2183
Superior Court. The court noted that it is questionable whether Xxxxxx is still good law in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s deci- sion in AT&T Mobility x.
Superior Court. Any Party, after participating in the non-binding mediation, may commence an action in King County Superior Court after one hundred eighty (180) days from the commencement of the mediation, in order to resolve an issue that has not by then been resolved through non-binding mediation, unless all Parties to the mediation agree to an earlier date for ending the mediation.
Superior Court. Superior Court of California, County of Marin.
Superior Court. The State of California, Alameda County Superior Court.
Superior Court. California Superior Court for the County of San Diego.
