Testing of Proposed Alternatives to Visual Verifications Sample Clauses

Testing of Proposed Alternatives to Visual Verifications. If ACS plans to include a CAPTCHA on the ACS Website, it will provide a method for Claimant’s representatives to test the alternative security measure to ensure that it is usable by Persons with a Visual Impairment prior to the inclusion of the CAPTCHA on the ACS Website. ACS will give good faith consideration to all feedback provided by Xxxxxxxx’s representatives if it is provided in writing within fifteen (15) days of the testing. Any disagreements regarding this feedback will be treated as a dispute subject to the terms of Section 9 of this Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Testing of Proposed Alternatives to Visual Verifications. If Central Source plans to include a CAPTCHA on xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx after July 1, 2008, Central Source will provide a method for Claimants’ representatives to test the alternative security measure to ensure that it is usable by Persons with a Visual Impairment. Such testing will occur no later than May 15, 2008, and Central Source will give good faith consideration to all feedback provided by Claimants’ representatives. Claimants shall provide any feedback within fifteen (15) days of the testing. Any disagreements regarding this feedback will be treated as a dispute subject to the terms of section 13, below. Testing of any alternative security measure to be used on any portion of any CRA’s individual website that is required to be accessible pursuant to this Agreement shall take place in accordance with the provisions of section 6.3.3, above.
Sample 1Sample 2
Testing of Proposed Alternatives to Visual Verifications. If, after the Effective Date, Staples plans to continue using any security measure that includes a CAPTCHA on xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx, Staples will provide a method for Claimants’ representatives to test the alternative security measure to ensure that it is usable by Persons with Visual Impairments. Such testing will occur no later than April 30, 2009 and Staples will give good faith consideration to all feedback provided by Claimants’ representatives, provided that such feedback is provided within fifteen (15) days of the testing. Any disagreements regarding this feedback will be treated as a dispute subject to the terms of the dispute resolution provisions of Section 8 of this Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Testing of Proposed Alternatives to Visual Verifications. If Weight Watchers plans to include a CAPTCHA on any of the Weight Watchers Websites, it will provide a method for Claimants’ representatives to test the alternative security measure to ensure that it is usable by Persons with Visual Impairments prior to the inclusion of the CAPTCHA on the Weight Watchers Websites. Weight Watchers will give good faith consideration to all feedback provided by Claimants’ representatives if it is provided in writing within fifteen (15) days of the testing.
Sample 1

Related to Testing of Proposed Alternatives to Visual Verifications

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Response/Compliance with Audit or Inspection Findings A. Grantee must act to ensure its and its Subcontractors’ compliance with all corrections necessary to address any finding of noncompliance with any law, regulation, audit requirement, or generally accepted accounting principle, or any other deficiency identified in any audit, review, or inspection of the Contract and the services and Deliverables provided. Any such correction will be at Grantee’s or its Subcontractor's sole expense. Whether Xxxxxxx's action corrects the noncompliance shall be solely the decision of the System Agency.

  • Credentialing Requirements Registry Operator, through the facilitation of the CZDA Provider, will request each user to provide it with information sufficient to correctly identify and locate the user. Such user information will include, without limitation, company name, contact name, address, telephone number, facsimile number, email address and IP address.

  • Technical Objections to Grievance No grievance will be defeated or denied by any minor technical objection.

  • Additional Wet Weather Procedure 14.15.1 Remaining On Site Where, because of wet weather, the employees are prevented from working:

  • JOC - PRICING OF After Hours Coefficient What is your after hours coefficient for the RS Means Price Book for work performed after normal working hours? (FAILURE TO RESPOND PROHIBITS PART 2 JOC EVALUATION) Remember that this is a ceiling price proposed. You can discount to any TIPS Member customer a lower coefficient than your proposed contract coefficient, but not higher. This is one of three pricing questions that are required for consideration for award on this solicitation. Please consider your answer carefully. An explanation of the TIPS scoring of pricing titled "Pricing Coefficient Instruction" is included in the attachments for your information. The below is an EXAMPLE of how the pricing model works (It is not intended to influence your proposed coefficient, you should propose a coefficient that you determine is reasonable for your business for the life of the contract): The most common after hours coefficient is time and a half of the RS Means Unit Price Book prices. To illustrate this coefficient, if your regular hours coefficient is .95, your after hours coefficient would be 1.45.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.