Theme 8: Functionality Sample Clauses

Theme 8: Functionality. The functionality theme assesses tests related to the functions available to users and administrators. This theme covers users’ interactions with the system and administrators functionality. Table 18 - Case Study 1 External Testing Functionality Theme Details Notifications Using this feature can lead to an email glut of notifications. Add 'your notifications' to tab to avoid this. Basket features Adding items to personal basket was challenging. Make available at top right hand of the screen, or run alongside from top right hand side of screen. Perhaps name it ‘my account’ as opposed to ‘basket’. Export features No PDF option Why not allow export to PDF? Browser requirements Not clearly stated and functionality found to vary. Chrome browser didn't give the option to bypass security on laptop but IE did. Xxxxxx worked on one pc. Please state clearly browser requirements.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Theme 8: Functionality. The functionality theme assesses tests related to the functions available to users and administrators. Table 47 - Case Study 5 & 6 External Testing Functionality Theme Details Annotator pen feature Users worked with the annotator pen and checked if annotations were saved. Users have no problems using this feature apart from a time lag experienced in the annotations appearance. No further suggestions made.
Theme 8: Functionality. The functionality theme assesses tests related to the functions available to users and administrators. Table 41 - Case Study 4 External Testing Functionality Theme Details Export features “Export as” options export different elements and not the same element in a different format. Improve consistency of export. System timeout Loss of session info present. No suggestions made. Interface Not user-friendly. Interface can be more user friendly. Colours Colors (green, blue) in my account page don’t match. No suggestion made. Data missing from export Post exported as PDF but didn’t contain all the post’s data. Improve PDF export. Data missing from export Exported PDF didn’t contain all the images. Improve PDF export.
Theme 8: Functionality. The functionality theme assesses tests related to the functions available to users and administrators. Table 24 - Case Study 2 External Testing Functionality Theme Details Export features The data provided in the export section are poor. User doesn’t see the point in providing the PDF and JPG options. Export features The export links at the bottom of the page have different behaviour. For example, BibTex provides information, whereas JPG provides the actual content. No suggestions made

Related to Theme 8: Functionality

  • Future Functionality You agree that Your purchases are not contingent on the delivery of any future functionality or features, or dependent on any oral or written public comments made by Us regarding future functionality or features.

  • Current Online Content and Functionality By January 31, 2019, the District agrees that it will take all actions necessary to ensure that individuals with disabilities have an equal opportunity to participate in the District’s programs and activities offered through the District’s website or equally effective alternate access. To meet this commitment, the District will: develop a strategy for identifying inaccessible content and functionality for individuals with disabilities; develop a notice to persons with disabilities regarding how to request that the District provide access to online information or functionality; prominently post this notice on its home page and throughout its website; and develop a process to ensure that, upon request, inaccessible content and functionality will be made accessible1 in an expedient manner.

  • Functionality Customer is entitled to additional functionality previously purchased or bundled with the software if available in the version or update released on or after the start date of the Agreement. Customer acknowledges that certain functionality in current and previous software versions may not be available in future upgrades. Added functionality may require additional paid services (clinical and technical) to configure and support.

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By October 31, 2017, the School will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly-added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the School to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the School, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternates are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the School’s online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the School will officially adopt, and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.

  • CUSTOMER SERVICE FUNCTIONS The Servicer shall handle all Customer inquiries and other Customer service matters according to the same procedures it uses to service Customers with respect to its own charges.

  • Interoperability To the extent required by applicable law, Cisco shall provide You with the interface information needed to achieve interoperability between the Software and another independently created program. Cisco will provide this interface information at Your written request after you pay Cisco’s licensing fees (if any). You will keep this information in strict confidence and strictly follow any applicable terms and conditions upon which Cisco makes such information available.

  • Evaluation Software If the Software is an evaluation version or is provided to You for evaluation purposes, then, unless otherwise approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor, Your license to use the Software is limited solely for internal evaluation purposes in non-production use and in accordance with the terms of the evaluation offering under which You received the Software, and expires 90 days from installation (or such other period as may be indicated within the Software). Upon expiration of the evaluation period, You must discontinue use of the Software, return to an original state any actions performed by the Software, and delete the Software entirely from Your system and You may not download the Software again unless approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor. The Software may contain an automatic disabling mechanism that prevents its use after a certain period of time. RESTRICTIONS

  • System Logging The system must maintain an automated audit trail which can 20 identify the user or system process which initiates a request for PHI COUNTY discloses to 21 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY, 22 or which alters such PHI. The audit trail must be date and time stamped, must log both successful and 23 failed accesses, must be read only, and must be restricted to authorized users. If such PHI is stored in a 24 database, database logging functionality must be enabled. Audit trail data must be archived for at least 3 25 years after occurrence.

  • Localization Should any Seller Affiliate and any Customer Affiliate wish to enter into an agreement for the provision of Deliverables, Products and/or Services ("Local Agreement") in the Netherlands, Canada, Hong Kong, the United States, Australia, Ireland, Singapore, South Africa or the United Arab Emirates (as applicable) Local Agreement(s) can be agreed between the Parties and added as Exhibit(s) to this Agreement by way of addendum. The terms of this Agreement shall be incorporated into each such Local Agreement except to the extent that the Local Agreement expressly states that any amendments shall take precedence.

  • Registry Functions Activity Report This report shall be compiled in a comma separated-value formatted file as specified in RFC 4180. The file shall be named “gTLD-activity-yyyymm.csv”, where “gTLD” is the gTLD name; in case of an IDN-TLD, the A-label shall be used; “yyyymm” is the year and month being reported. The file shall contain the following fields: 01 operational-registrars number of operational registrars at the end of the reporting period 02 ramp-up-registrars number of registrars that have received a password for access to OT&E at the end of the reporting period 03 pre-ramp-up-registrars number of registrars that have requested access, but have not yet entered the ramp-up period at the end of the reporting period 06 web-whois-queries number of Web-based Whois queries responded during the reporting period, not including searchable Whois 09 dns-udp-queries-responded number of DNS queries received over UDP transport that were responded during the reporting period 10 dns-tcp-queries-received number of DNS queries received over TCP transport during the reporting period 11 dns-tcp-queries-responded number of DNS queries received over TCP transport that were responded during the reporting period 12 srs-dom-check number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “check” requests responded during the reporting period 13 srs-dom-create number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “create” requests responded during the reporting period 14 srs-dom-delete number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “delete” requests responded during the reporting period 15 srs-dom-info number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “info” requests responded during the reporting period 16 srs-dom-renew number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “renew” requests responded during the reporting period 17 srs-dom-rgp-restore-report number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name RGP “restore” requests delivering a restore report responded during the reporting period 18 srs-dom-rgp-restore-request number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name RGP “restore” requests responded during the reporting period 19 srs-dom-transfer-approve number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “transfer” requests to approve transfers responded during the reporting period 20 srs-dom-transfer-cancel number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “transfer” requests to cancel transfers responded during the reporting period 21 srs-dom-transfer-query number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “transfer” requests to query about a transfer responded during the reporting period 22 srs-dom-transfer-reject number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “transfer” requests to reject transfers responded during the reporting period 23 srs-dom-transfer-request number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “transfer” requests to request transfers responded during the reporting period 24 srs-dom-update number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) domain name “update” requests (not including RGP restore requests) responded during the reporting period 25 srs-host-check number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) host “check” requests responded during the reporting period 26 srs-host-create number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) host “create” requests responded during the reporting period 27 srs-host-delete number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) host “delete” requests responded during the reporting period 28 srs-host-info number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) host “info” requests responded during the reporting period 29 srs-host-update number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) host “update” requests responded during the reporting period 30 srs-cont-check number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “check” requests responded during the reporting period 32 srs-cont-delete number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “delete” requests responded during the reporting period 33 srs-cont-info number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “info” requests responded during the reporting period 34 srs-cont-transfer-approve number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “transfer” requests to approve transfers responded during the reporting period 35 srs-cont-transfer-cancel number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “transfer” requests to cancel transfers responded during the reporting period 36 srs-cont-transfer-query number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “transfer” requests to query about a transfer responded during the reporting period 37 srs-cont-transfer-reject number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “transfer” requests to reject transfers responded during the reporting period 38 srs-cont-transfer-request number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “transfer” requests to request transfers responded during the reporting period 39 srs-cont-update number of SRS (EPP and any other interface) contact “update” requests responded during the reporting period The first line shall include the field names exactly as described in the table above as a “header line” as described in section 2 of RFC 4180. No other lines besides the ones described above shall be included. Line breaks shall be <U+000D, U+000A> as described in RFC 4180. For gTLDs that are part of a single-instance Shared Registry System, the Registry Functions Activity Report may include the total contact or host transactions for all the gTLDs in the system. REGISTRATION DATA PUBLICATION SERVICES

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!