Table 18. Measure 6.2b, Permanency Rates by Report Period Children Who Achieved Permanency within 2 years (Most Recent on Left Side) Permanency Type 12-Month Data Report Period End Sept-18 Mar-18 Sep-17 Mar-17 Sep-16 ADOPTION 26% 30% 24% 21% 17% REUNIFICATION 25% 24% 25% 24% 23% CUSTODY TO RELATIVE 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% GUARDIANSHIP 3% 1% 4% 4% 3% TOTAL 54% 56% 54% 49% 44% While PSCs, as noted above, provide the practice structure to keep child welfare staff systematically focused on achieving permanency through reunification as soon as possible, PSCs also compel DHS to evaluate continuously if and when it may be in a child’s best interest to terminate parental rights and work toward achieving permanency through adoption. DHS must understand the factors that prompted this downturn in the percentage of adoptions finalized for the 6.2b cohort in order to prevent stagnation or an additional reduction in permanency outcomes under this measure. For this report period, the Co-Neutrals find that DHS has made good faith efforts to achieve substantial and sustained progress toward the Target Outcome for Metric 6.2b. 30.0% 20.0% 10.0%
Table 18. A2 (b) Alternative 1. Timber on wooded land, in million euros, Net present value of expected future revenues Reference year = 2019*
Table 18. Do you attend to courses, workshops and seminars in your area using your own resources?...................................…..……………….. 47 Table 19: Do you frequently upgrade your professionalism?......………… 48 Table 20: Do you have the support of the institution where you work, to develop English teaching-learning process in an appropriate level?.............................................................................................……….... 49 Table 21: Do you have an easy access to dialogue with teachers and High School´s authorities concerning to the students that you represent?.. 50 Table 22: Do you know if English teachers use any kind of resources into the teaching-learning process?..........................................……………….... 51 Table 23: Do you know if English teachers update their knowledge frequently?...........……………………………………………………………… 52 Table 24: Do you like the way your represented student is receiving English as a second language?................................................................... 53
Table 18. Sample of acoustic monitoring devices commercially available and commonly used during ecological and underwater noise monitoring. 59 Table 19. Available software and informatics’ tools 60 Table 20. Actions required for improving and strengthening the application of mitigation frameworks 61 List of Acronyms (1) the Mediterranean List of Acronyms (2)
Table 18. The climatic zones and varieties cultivated in the Use Case of FARSALA 34
