Theoretical Analysis Sample Clauses

Theoretical Analysis. The primary focus of the theoretical effort will be upon Monte Carlo (MC) calculations aimed at gaining a detailed understanding of the role of chromophore (and dendrimer) shape upon ordering under the influence of an electric xxxxxx field. Simulations will be run using a to-be- acquired high-speed computer. Calculations will be carried out as functions of chromophore number density, chromophore shape and electronic structure (dipole moment, polarizability, etc.) of the chromophores. The Principal Investigator believes that a particular advantage of MC methods is the opportunity for visualization of transient ordered states. One result of MC calculations appears to be the confirmation of the fundamental correctness of the Xxxxxxx picture of ordering due to long-range, spatially-anisotropic dipole-dipole interactions. MC methods appear to be appropriate for all concentration domains (from dilute solutions of chromophores to neat chromophore materials) and the pictures of transiently ordered phases may be useful in understanding light scattering as a function of chromophore concentration and also for understanding the results of pulsed xxxxxx experiments. Such subtle physical insight may prove a useful guide for the further modification of chromophore shape and electronic properties and for optimizing the protocols for inducing acentric chromophore order.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Theoretical Analysis. We initially look at the online unpredictability that is basic for the reasonableness of a ConBE conspires. While assessing the execution, we utilize the generally embraced measurements for customary BE plans. In these measurements, the expenses of straightforward tasks (e.g., read the files of recipients and play out some basic evaluation of group components related to these lists) and correspondence (e.g., the paired portrayal of the collectors' set) are not thought about. After the CBSetup technique, a sender needs to recover and store the group open key PK comprising of n components in G and n components in GT. In addition, for encryption, the sender needs just two exponentiations and the ciphertext simply contains two components in G. This is about n times more effective than the paltry arrangement. At the collector's side, notwithstanding the depiction of the bilinear combine which might be shared by numerous other security applications, a recipient needs to store n components in G for decoding. For decoding, a recipient needs to figure two single-base bilinear pairings (or one two base bilinear matching). The online expenses on the sides of both the sender and the collectors are extremely low. We next talk about the unpredictability of the CBSetup methodology to set up a ConBE framework. The overhead caused by this technique is O (n2). This method should be run just once and this should be possible disconnected before the online transmission of mystery session keys. For example, in the interpersonal organizations case, various companions trade their CBSetup transcripts and build up a ConBE framework to anchor their resulting sharing of private picture/videos. Since ConBE permits renouncing persons, the persons don't have to reassemble for another kept running of the CBSetup technique until the point when some new companions join. From our own understanding, the group lifetime for the most part keeps going from weeks to months. These perceptions infer that our convention is commonsense in reality. Besides, if the underlying group is too extensive, an effective exchange off can be utilized to adjust the on the web and disconnected expenses. Assume that n is a shape, i.e., n = n1 3, and the underlying group has n individuals. We separate the full group into n1 2 subgroups, every one of which has n1 individuals. By applying our essential ConBE to every subgroup, we get a ConBE plot with O (n 2)- measure transcripts per part amid the disconnected phase o...
Theoretical Analysis. We first examine the online complexity that is critical for the practicality of a ConBE scheme. When evaluating the performance, we use the widely adopted metrics for regular BE schemes. In these metrics, the costs of simple operations (e.g., read the indices of receivers and perform some simple quantification of group elements associated to these indices) and communication (e.g., the binary representation of the receivers’ set) are not taken into consideration. After the CBSetup procedure, a sender needs to retrieve and store the group public key PK consisting of n elements in G and n elements in GT. Moreover, for encryption, the sender needs only two exponentiations and the ciphertext merely contains two elements in G. This is about n times more efficient than the trivial solution. At the receiver’s side, in addition to the description of the bilinear pair which may be shared by many other security applications, a receiver needs to store n elements in G for decryption. For decryption, a receiver needs to compute two single-base bilinear pairings (or one double base bilinear pairing). The online costs on the sides of both the sender and the receivers are really low. We next discuss the complexity of the CBSetup procedure to set up a ConBE system. The overhead incurred by this procedure is O (n2). This procedure needs to be run only once and this can be done offline before the online transmission of secret session keys. For instance, in the social networks example, a number of friends exchange n 1 their CBSetup transcripts and establish a ConBE system to initial group has n members. We divide the full group into secure their subsequent sharing of private picture/videos.

Related to Theoretical Analysis

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Escrow Analysis If applicable, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, the Seller has within the last twelve months (unless such Mortgage was originated within such twelve month period) analyzed the required Escrow Payments for each Mortgage and adjusted the amount of such payments so that, assuming all required payments are timely made, any deficiency will be eliminated on or before the first anniversary of such analysis, or any overage will be refunded to the Mortgagor, in accordance with RESPA and any other applicable law;

  • Statistical Sampling Documentation a. A copy of the printout of the random numbers generated by the “Random Numbers” function of the statistical sampling software used by the IRO.‌ b. A description or identification of the statistical sampling software package used by the IRO.‌

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Sampling and Analysis The Seller has sole responsibility for quality control of the coal and shall forward its “as loaded” quality to the Buyer as soon as possible. The sampling and analysis of the coal delivered hereunder shall be performed by Buyer and the results thereof shall be accepted and used for the quality and characteristics of the coal delivered under this Agreement. All analyses shall be made in Buyer’s laboratory at Buyer’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or using standards mutually acceptable to both parties. Samples for analyses shall be taken by any ASTM standards or standards mutually acceptable to both parties, and may be composited and shall be taken with a frequency and regularity sufficient to provide reasonably accurate representative samples of the deliveries made hereunder. Seller represents that it is familiar with Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices, and finds them to be acceptable. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any significant changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices. Any such changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices shall, except for ASTM or mutually agreeable changes in practices, provide for no less accuracy than the sampling and analysis practices existing at the time of the execution of this Agreement, unless the Parties otherwise mutually agree. (1) part shall be used for analysis by Buyer; one (l) part shall be used by Buyer as a check sample, if Buyer in its sole judgment determines it is necessary; one (1) part shall be retained by Buyer (LG&E) until the twenty-fifth (25th) of the month following the month of unloading (the “LG&E Disposal Date”) or Buyer (KU) until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (the “KU Disposal Date”), the LG&E Disposal Date and the KU Disposal Date are collectively the “Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Seller for analysis if Seller so requests before the Disposal Date; and one part (“Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Buyer until the Disposal Date. Seller shall be given copies of all analyses made by Buyer by the tenth (10th) business day of the month following the month of unloading. Seller, on reasonable notice to Buyer shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Buyer. Unless Seller requests a Referee Sample analysis before the Disposal Date, Buyer’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal delivered hereunder. The Monthly Weighted Averages shall be determined by utilizing the individual shipment analyses. If any dispute arises before the Disposal Date, the Referee Sample retained by Buyer shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, a dispute shall be deemed not to exist and Buyer’s analysis shall prevail and the analysis of the Independent Lab shall be disregarded if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs from the analysis of Buyer by an amount equal to or less than: (i) 0.50% moisture (ii) 0.50% ash on a dry basis (iii) 100 Btu/lb. on a dry basis (iv) 0.10% sulfur on a dry basis. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs from the analysis of Buyer by an amount more than the amounts listed above, then the analysis of the Independent Lab shall prevail and Buyer’s analysis shall be disregarded. The cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by Seller to the extent that Buyer’s analysis prevails and by Buyer to the extent that the analysis of the Independent Lab prevails.

  • SAMPLE (If applicable and the project has specifications, insert the specifications into this section.)

  • Independent Analysis Each Party hereby confirms that its decision to execute this Agreement has been based upon its independent assessment of documents and information available to it, as it has deemed appropriate.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Tests and Preclinical and Clinical Trials The preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by or, to the Company’s knowledge, on behalf of the Company, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, as applicable, and are intended to be submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) or other comparable government entities, were and, if still ongoing, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to accepted professional scientific standards and all Authorizations and Applicable Laws, including, without limitation, current Good Clinical Practices and Good Laboratory Practices and any applicable rules and regulations of the jurisdiction in which such trials and studies are being conducted; the descriptions of the results of such studies and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus are, to the Company’s knowledge, accurate and complete in all material respects and fairly present the data derived from such studies and trials; except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, the Company is not aware of any studies or trials, the results of which the Company believes reasonably call into question the study or trial results described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described and the clinical stage of development; and, except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, the Company has not received any written notices or written correspondence from the FDA or any governmental entity requiring the termination or suspension of any preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company, other than ordinary course communications with respect to modifications in connection with the design and implementation of such trials, copies of which communications have been made available to you.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!