Unilateral Mistake Sample Clauses

The Unilateral Mistake clause addresses situations where only one party to a contract is mistaken about a fundamental fact related to the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines the conditions under which a contract may be voided or modified if such a mistake significantly affects the terms or obligations, such as a miscalculation in pricing or misunderstanding of a key specification. Its core function is to provide a mechanism for resolving disputes arising from one-sided errors, thereby promoting fairness and preventing unjust enrichment due to honest mistakes.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 8 times
Unilateral Mistake. In mutual mistake cases, both parties are operating under the same misperception as to material facts.127 In unilateral mistake cases, only one party has an erroneous perception as to the facts.128 In order to avoid a contract on the grounds of unilateral mistake, the adversely affected party must show the requirements necessary for mutual mistake. In addition, the adversely affected party must also show either that the effect of the mistake would make enforcement of the contract unconscionable or that the other party had reason to know of the mistake, or caused the mistake.129 If the doctrinal distinction between unilateral and mutual mistake is weak, the factual distinction is sometimes imperceptible.130 Not surprisingly, avoiding parties often seem confused about whether they should claim mutual or unilateral mistake, as the same facts often give rise to claims for both defenses.131 Courts generally have been reluctant to allow avoidance in cases where parties have sought relief on the grounds of unilateral mistake.132 Typically, successful cases have involved technical or computational errors.133 For example, in ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Construction Co. v. City of Los 126. See id. at 455 (majority opinion).
Unilateral Mistake. When one of the parties to the contract is under a mistake as to the matter of fact, it is known as unilateral mistake. A contract is not voidable merely because it was caused by one of the parties to it being under a mistake.  When there is a mistake as to the identity of the person contracted with. ( ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Vs Potter)  When there is a mistake as to the nature of the contract. (▇▇▇▇▇▇ Vs ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇) According to section 23, The object of the agreement is lawful unless “it is forbidden by law or is of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law or is fraudulent or it involves or implies injury to the person or property of another or the court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy.  Forbidden by law- Giving bribe to get a job, selling pirated movie cds.  Defeats the provision of any law- ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Vs Goppayya  If it is fraudulent – Swindling the public money  If it involves or implies harm to the person or property – ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ vs ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇  If the court regards it as immoral- Baivijli Vs Nansa Nagar  If the court regards it as opposed to public policy- black marketing, adulteration, agreement with alien enemy.  An agreement in restraint of marriage.  An agreement in restraint of trade.  An agreement in restraint of legal proceeding. A wager contract is a contract in which one person promises to another to pay money or money’s worth by the happening of an uncertain future event in consideration for other person’s promise to pay if the event does not happen.  There are two persons.  There must be an uncertain future event.  No control over the event by both the parties.  There must be a reciprocal promise.  Others are not interested in the contract. In a wrestling bout, A tells B that wrestler no.1 will win. B challenges the statement of A. They bet with each other over the result of the bout. This is a wagering agreement. A contingent contract is a contract to do or not to do something, if some event, collateral to such contract, does or does not happen. It is also called a conditional contract.  There are two persons.  There must be an uncertain future event.  Some control over the event but not absolute control.  There is no reciprocal promise between the persons.  Others may be interested in the contract.  It is a valid contract.  Contingent contracts dependent on happening of an uncertain future event cannot be enforced until the event has happened.( Sec 32 )  Where a contingent contr...
Unilateral Mistake an error on the part of one of the parties to the contract. Mistake ­> Nature of the Agreement (not reading a contract or not knowing what it says). This cannot be an excuse to avoid a contract. • If the mistaken identity is made in person, it will not prevent a binding contract. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/home/more­than­a­dozen­homeowners­on­long­island­lose­homes­in­mortgage­scam/990107/
Unilateral Mistake. Where one party knows of a mistake and the other party does not know, the court will award the mistaking party damages. Since ▇▇▇▇▇▇ signed the contract realizing that the Califronia coastline was omitted and would have still received the $450,000, he is the non mistaken party, and ▇▇▇ should get damages for the non receipt of the California coastline painting. ▇▇▇ should be awarded damages of the fair market value of the California Coastline.
Unilateral Mistake when ONE party holds an incorrect belief about the facts related to the contract

Related to Unilateral Mistake

  • Termination for Material Breach If either Party (the “Non-Breaching Party”) believes that the other Party (the “Breaching Party”) has materially breached one or more of its obligations under this Agreement, then the Non-Breaching Party may deliver notice of such material breach to the Breaching Party specifying the nature of the alleged breach in reasonable detail (a “Default Notice”). Thereafter, the Non-Breaching Party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement if the breach asserted in such Default Notice has not been cured within sixty (60) days after such Default Notice. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) if such material breach, by its nature, cannot be remedied within such sixty (60) day cure period, but can be remedied over a longer period not expected to exceed one hundred and fifty (150) days, then such sixty (60) day period shall be extended for up to an additional ninety (90) days provided that the Breaching Party provides the Non-Breaching Party with a reasonable written plan for curing such material breach and uses Commercially Reasonable Efforts to cure such material breach in accordance with such written plan and (ii) if such material breach cannot be cured, but the effects of such material breach are not such that the Non-Breaching Party would be deprived of the material benefits the Non-Breaching Party would reasonably be expected to derive from this Agreement in the absence of such material breach, then the Non-Breaching Party shall not be entitled to terminate this Agreement on the basis of such material breach unless the Breaching Party has previously committed a substantially similar material breach of this Agreement. For clarity, a breach of Section 3.2.3 of this Agreement shall not, notwithstanding anything herein, fall within the exception in subpart (ii) of the immediately preceding sentence.

  • Termination for Force Majeure 15.5.1. The License Agreement may be terminated for Force Majeure Reasons as specified in Article -14.

  • Impact direct impact on people does not necessarily require direct contact, for example, environmental health, trading standards and similar officers may have a direct impact on people, through the implementation or enforcement of regulations, without necessarily having direct contact with those who benefit.

  • Right to Grieve Disciplinary Action Employees shall have the right to grieve written censures or warnings, and adverse employee appraisals. Employees shall have the right to rebut in writing any disciplinary notice and that rebuttal will be placed in the employee file, but will not be part of the formal disciplinary record. Should an employee dispute any such entry in his/her file, he/she shall be entitled to recourse through the Grievance Procedure and the eventual resolution thereof shall become part of his/her personal record.

  • Independence from Material Breach Determination Except as set forth in Section X.D.1.c, these provisions for payment of Stipulated Penalties shall not affect or otherwise set a standard for OIG’s decision that CCH has materially breached this CIA, which decision shall be made at OIG’s discretion and shall be governed by the provisions in Section X.D, below.