Validate assessment algorithm Sample Clauses

Validate assessment algorithm. 6.2.2.1 General considerations The point regarding the impossibility of establishing objective correctness and completeness of a CORAS diagram discussed in Section 6.1.2 applies, of course, also for the corresponding assessment algorithm. Xxxxxxx and Xxxx [14] (p. 392) states the point nicely when discussing the subjectivity of risk management: "The best one can aim for is consistency within the model, overall soundness of the model, and an on average high level of user acceptance and appreciation of the results." The goal of the validation of the assessment algorithm is therefore to establish its consistency and overall soundness, in order to obtain user acceptance and confidence that the outputs from the algorithm provide useful information that reflects reality reasonably well. In our context, soundness means that if the input obtained from the indicators reflects reality, then the risk level assessments provided by the algorithm also reflect reality. The CORAS calculus has been developed in order to support identification of inconsistencies in a CORAS diagram annotated with likelihood assessments. We have designed the guidelines presented in Section 8 and Section 9 with the aim of ensuring that consistency results from faithfully following the guidelines. With respect to soundness of the algorithm, this should ideally be established by triangulation, which means that the results from the algorithm are compared to results obtained through other means. Depending on the data and resources available, there are different ways this can be done.  If historical data are available for indicators as well as past incidents, then the assessment algorithm can be run using sets of indicator values that applied at specific points in the past. We can then compare the risk level assessments produced by the algorithm to the risks that actually materialized over a defined period, to see if there is a correlation. This approach has the obvious benefit of using fully realistic historical data. However, such data are not always available.  If historical data of past incidents are not available, then the results from the assessment algorithm can be compared to risk level assessments done following other risk assessment methods, independently of the algorithm. Unfortunately, since risk assessment processes normally require quite a lot of resources, such a process may be quite costly.  A thought experiment can also be employed for triangulation. This can be done by providin...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Validate assessment algorithm

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures.

  • Project Completion Report At the completion of construction and once a Project is placed in service, the Subrecipient must submit a Project Completion Report that includes the total number of units built and leased, affordable units built and leased, DR-MHP units built and leased, an accomplishment narrative, and the tenants names, demographics and income for each DR-MHP unit.

  • Conformity Assessment 1. The Parties recognize that a broad range of mechanisms exists to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment procedures and results thereby, including:

  • Project Reports; Completion Report 1. The Recipient shall monitor and evaluate the progress of the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.06 of the Standard Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the World Bank. Each Project Report shall cover the period of one (1) calendar semester, and shall be furnished to the World Bank not later than one (1) month after the end of the period covered by such report.

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Final Project Report Prepare a Final Project Report that addresses, to the extent feasible, comments made by the Grant Manager on the Draft Final Project Report. Submit one (1) reproducible master and an electronic copy of the final. Upload an electronic copy of the final report in pdf format to the FAAST system.

  • Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The party named in article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following:

  • CMI/RAI MDS Report Recognizing the mutual objective of quality resident care, the Employer agrees to meet through the Union Management Committee with the Union as soon as practicable after the receipt of the annual CMI/RAI MDS report. The Employer agrees to provide the Union with staffing levels, and staffing mix information; the impact of related payroll costs on staffing levels and a written notice of the CMI/RAI MDS report for the facility. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the impact of the CMI/RAI MDS report on the staffing levels in the Home, quality resident care, and provide the Union with an opportunity to make representation in that regard. The parties shall meet as necessary to discuss other changes or workload issues. The parties may invite additional participants to attend the meeting to support constructive review and discussion.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.