Verb Second Revisited Sample Clauses

Verb Second Revisited. An important assumption that we made in section 4 was that complementizer agreement differs from ordinary Spec-Head agreement because it is a morphological reflex of Agr-to-C movement. This explains among other things why complementizer agreement, if present, rarely shows a full paradigm, and why it is a disappearing phenomenon (Xxxxxxxx 1949). This also makes it possible to widen the scope of the Agr-to-C hypothesis. Instead of saying that Agr-to-C takes place only when there is a morphological reflex of it, we could say that it takes place in all varieties of Dutch and German, even in the standard varieties, where no overt complementizer agreement exists. This is what I will crucially assume in the remainder of this article. It will appear that the Agr-to-C hypothesis provides a natural explanation for the asymmetry between main and embedded clauses in (1)-(9), which is fully compatible with the minimal assumptions that we started out with.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Verb Second Revisited

  • FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION CONTRACT CLAUSES IN FULL TEXT 52.211-15 DEFENSE PRIORITY AND ALLOCATION REQUIREMENTS (APR 2008) This is a rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use, and the Contractor shall follow all the requirements of the Defense Priorities and Allocations System regulation (15 CFR 700).

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Travelling, Transport and Fares (a) An employee required and authorised to use their own motor vehicle in the course of their duties will be paid not less than the allowance set out in item 21 in Table 2.

  • AIR FORCE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SUPPLEMENT CONTRACT CLAUSES 5352.201-9101 OMBUDSMAN (APR 2014) Para (c). Ombudsmen names, addresses, phone numbers, fax, and email addresses. 'Xx. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, AFLCMC/AQP, Phone: DSN 000-0000 Comm (000) 000-0000, E- mail: Xxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.0@xx.xx.xxx.' 5352.223-9000 ELIMINATION OF USE OF CLASS I OZONE DEPLETING SUBSTANCES (ODS) (NOV 2012) 5352.223-9001 HEALTH AND SAFETY ON GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS (NOV 2012) 5352.242-9000 CONTRACTOR ACCESS TO AIR FORCE INSTALLATIONS (NOV 2012) Para (b), Any additional requirements to comply with local security procedures '"to be cited in each individual task order"' Para (d). Additional requirements. '"any additional requirements to comply with AFI 31- 101, Volume 1, the Air Force Installation Security Program, and AFI 31-501, Personnel Security Program Management"' 5352.242-9001 COMMON ACCESS CARDS (CAC) FOR CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL-AF SYSTEMS (NOV 2012)

  • Planning agreement under the Act The parties agree that this Agreement is a planning agreement governed by Section 7.4 and Subdivision 2 of Division 7.1 of Part 7 of the Act.

  • DEFENSE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SUPPLEMENT CONTRACT CLAUSES 252.246-7000 MATERIAL INSPECTION AND RECEIVING REPORT (MAR 2008)

  • Drug and Alcohol Testing – Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Employees required to have a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) are subject to pre-employment, post-accident, random and reasonable suspicion testing in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation rules, Coast Guard Regulations (46 CFR Part 16) or the Federal Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991. The testing will be conducted in accordance with current Employer policy.

  • CALENDAR FOR SUCCESSOR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING In the event Union or Management desires a successor MOU, said party shall serve upon the other between April 1, 2018 and April 30, 2018, its written proposals for such successor MOU. Meet and confer sessions shall begin no later than thirty (30) calendar days following submittal of the proposals.

  • ETHICS IN PUBLIC CONTRACTING This Contract incorporates by reference Article 9 of the Arlington County Purchasing Resolution, as well as all state and federal laws related to ethics, conflicts of interest or bribery, including the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act (Code of Virginia § 2.2-3100 et seq.), the Virginia Governmental Frauds Act (Code of Virginia § 18.2-498.1 et seq.) and Articles 2 and 3 of Chapter 10 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, as amended (§ 18.2-438 et seq.). The Contractor certifies that its proposal was made without collusion or fraud; that it has not offered or received any kickbacks or inducements from any other offeror, supplier, manufacturer or subcontractor; and that it has not conferred on any public employee having official responsibility for this procurement any payment, loan, subscription, advance, deposit of money, services or anything of more than nominal value, present or promised, unless consideration of substantially equal or greater value was exchanged.

  • Deputy Minister The Deputy Minister is responsible for:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.